PDC is said to be a bad feature to use for something that should be as responsive as possible like Maschine. The recommended practice when third party plugins are concerned is simply not to use latency inducing plugins in Maschine and only use plugins that have very low (or zero) latency.ericj23 wrote:So did anyone catch whether it does PDC?
I will probably update anyway, but PDC would make it possible to consider using it for far more than just drums.
Maschine Studio and Maschine 2.0!!!
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 187 posts since 17 Jan, 2006
-
- KVRAF
- 2608 posts since 26 Aug, 2002 from here
So basically your saying that their machine studio can't be used as one, as any latency inducing plug-ins don't work. PDC can be switched on or off in any sensible host, but without it choice of plug-ins to use is massively limitedbunnywrench wrote:PDC is said to be a bad feature to use for something that should be as responsive as possible like Maschine. The recommended practice when third party plugins are concerned is simply not to use latency inducing plugins in Maschine and only use plugins that have very low (or zero) latency.ericj23 wrote:So did anyone catch whether it does PDC?
I will probably update anyway, but PDC would make it possible to consider using it for far more than just drums.
PS do you actually know that it has no PDC or are you surmising?
I believe every thread should devolve into character attacks and witch-burning. It really helps the discussion.
- KVRAF
- 4062 posts since 24 Oct, 2000 from A Swede Living in Budapest
I thought exactly the same thing. That NI took the time and effort to make a total rewrite to be able to make it 64 bit and not taking PDC into consideration sounds absurd. It has to be there.ericj23 wrote:PDC can be switched on or off in any sensible host, but without it choice of plug-ins to use is massively limited
/C
Neon City for u-he Repro - 80s pop & Synthwave soundbank
HARDWARE SAMPLER FANATIC - Akai S1100/S950/Z8 - Casio FZ20m - Emu Emax I - Ensoniq ASR10/EPS
HARDWARE SAMPLER FANATIC - Akai S1100/S950/Z8 - Casio FZ20m - Emu Emax I - Ensoniq ASR10/EPS
- KVRAF
- 4749 posts since 15 Jul, 2001 from Holmfirth, West Yorkshire, U.K
Trust me I requested sequencing features many many times, I asked for rx2 batch import and sync in time for loops so many times on both forums and via email.
musikmachine wrote:Well y'all could get involved on the forums, at lot of this stuff is by feature request and they had OTR threads where you could ask about things you wanted. Some of Nis design decisions leave me scratching my head but they've implemented a ton of stuff that users have been asking for.
I haven't seen much around things like groove templates but round robin seems like a pretty standard thing and i wish they'd allow pad layering like Geist but i guess i'll have to use groups!
But i think most of maschine's updates have been user driven from about 1.5, the most requested stuff has been slowly added but things have been left out or changed in 2.0. I think it's a good upgrade if it's got what you want but yeah the forums are worth checking for stuff they changed in 2.0.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 187 posts since 17 Jan, 2006
It doesn't do PDC. And I don't recommend using latency inducing plugins in Maschine for obvious reasons. Maschine is not a DAW. Being an instrument that gets used live in a real-time environment (albeit one than can host plugins), it should not have PDC since it should be as responsive as possible.
PDC would seriously alter the live playability of Maschine. Compensating for huge latencies and a responsive live instrument don't go hand in hand. It will only serve the people who are looking for a bloated DAW instead of a mean lean live playing machine. In a real-time environment you can't expect the computer to know what your going to do in the future. This is also why Ableton is in a conundrum of users still complaining about them not being able to figure out how to implement PDC properly in Live.
PDC would seriously alter the live playability of Maschine. Compensating for huge latencies and a responsive live instrument don't go hand in hand. It will only serve the people who are looking for a bloated DAW instead of a mean lean live playing machine. In a real-time environment you can't expect the computer to know what your going to do in the future. This is also why Ableton is in a conundrum of users still complaining about them not being able to figure out how to implement PDC properly in Live.
- KVRAF
- 4062 posts since 24 Oct, 2000 from A Swede Living in Budapest
"PDC can be switched on or off in any sensible host".bunnywrench wrote:It doesn't do PDC. And I don't recommend using latency inducing plugins in Maschine for obvious reasons. Maschine is not a DAW. Being an instrument that gets used live in a real-time environment (albeit one than can host plugins), it should not have PDC since it should be as responsive as possible.
PDC would seriously alter the live playability of Maschine. Compensating for huge latencies and a responsive live instrument don't go hand in hand. It will only serve the people who are looking for a bloated DAW instead of a mean lean live playing machine. In a real-time environment you can't expect the computer to know what your going to do in the future. This is also why Ableton is in a conundrum of users still complaining about them not being able to figure out how to implement PDC properly in Live.
Why would the ability to be able to switch on or off PDC in Maschine be anything but positive?
/C
Neon City for u-he Repro - 80s pop & Synthwave soundbank
HARDWARE SAMPLER FANATIC - Akai S1100/S950/Z8 - Casio FZ20m - Emu Emax I - Ensoniq ASR10/EPS
HARDWARE SAMPLER FANATIC - Akai S1100/S950/Z8 - Casio FZ20m - Emu Emax I - Ensoniq ASR10/EPS
-
- KVRian
- 997 posts since 27 Apr, 2005
DrGonzo wrote:"PDC can be switched on or off in any sensible host".bunnywrench wrote:It doesn't do PDC. And I don't recommend using latency inducing plugins in Maschine for obvious reasons. Maschine is not a DAW. Being an instrument that gets used live in a real-time environment (albeit one than can host plugins), it should not have PDC since it should be as responsive as possible.
PDC would seriously alter the live playability of Maschine. Compensating for huge latencies and a responsive live instrument don't go hand in hand. It will only serve the people who are looking for a bloated DAW instead of a mean lean live playing machine. In a real-time environment you can't expect the computer to know what your going to do in the future. This is also why Ableton is in a conundrum of users still complaining about them not being able to figure out how to implement PDC properly in Live.
Why would the ability to be able to switch on or off PDC in Maschine be anything but positive?
/C
Because NI is producing a specific tool, not a one size fits all sequencer. coding PDC in an application where the sequencing is non-linear is not a trivial undertaking, it's hard, and it would take a lot of effort to produce. And in the end it doesn't fit what maschine is. Maschine is the bastard love child of an MPC and Reason 5, expecting it to be anything else misses the point completely.
Now, can you finally audition rex files in this version or not?
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 187 posts since 17 Jan, 2006
Yes, and in project tempo.ShawnG wrote:Now, can you finally audition rex files in this version or not?
-
- KVRian
- 997 posts since 27 Apr, 2005
sweet, thx. one of the few things I wasn't able to confirm from the press releases. a small thing, but it bugged me.bunnywrench wrote:Yes, and in project tempo.ShawnG wrote:Now, can you finally audition rex files in this version or not?
- KVRAF
- 8644 posts since 2 Oct, 2006 from Leeds, UK
So i gotta ask, what was their response and was there much interest? They've rewritten so hopefully it's laid the foundation to implement these things.
topaz wrote:Trust me I requested sequencing features many many times, I asked for rx2 batch import and sync in time for loops so many times on both forums and via email.
musikmachine wrote:Well y'all could get involved on the forums, at lot of this stuff is by feature request and they had OTR threads where you could ask about things you wanted. Some of Nis design decisions leave me scratching my head but they've implemented a ton of stuff that users have been asking for.
I haven't seen much around things like groove templates but round robin seems like a pretty standard thing and i wish they'd allow pad layering like Geist but i guess i'll have to use groups!
But i think most of maschine's updates have been user driven from about 1.5, the most requested stuff has been slowly added but things have been left out or changed in 2.0. I think it's a good upgrade if it's got what you want but yeah the forums are worth checking for stuff they changed in 2.0.
Latest release and Socials: https://linktr.ee/ph.i.ltr3
- KVRAF
- 8644 posts since 2 Oct, 2006 from Leeds, UK
Excellent, i rarely used rex loops cause of the way it loads in 1.8.ShawnG wrote:sweet, thx. one of the few things I wasn't able to confirm from the press releases. a small thing, but it bugged me.bunnywrench wrote:Yes, and in project tempo.ShawnG wrote:Now, can you finally audition rex files in this version or not?
Latest release and Socials: https://linktr.ee/ph.i.ltr3
-
- KVRAF
- 1667 posts since 2 Apr, 2006 from Studio City, California
It took me quite a while to warm up to Maschine. Bought it when it first came out, tried it for a few projects then put it back in the box until last year. Then when I started using it the right side of the display stopped working so I had to buy new hardware. No wiper or Scene follow threw me off but as the software improved and I got over the KORE debacle, Maschine grew on me. So... I took the big plunge and Maschine Studio is being delivered Monday.

Brought to you by the Hall of Sound
http://soundcloud.com/section-d-records
www.soundclick.com/theresistanceband
http://soundcloud.com/section-d-records
www.soundclick.com/theresistanceband
- KVRAF
- 4749 posts since 15 Jul, 2001 from Holmfirth, West Yorkshire, U.K
I think I may as well of written gfdstyug&£-
musikmachine wrote:So i gotta ask, what was their response and was there much interest? They've rewritten so hopefully it's laid the foundation to implement these things.![]()
topaz wrote:Trust me I requested sequencing features many many times, I asked for rx2 batch import and sync in time for loops so many times on both forums and via email.
musikmachine wrote:Well y'all could get involved on the forums, at lot of this stuff is by feature request and they had OTR threads where you could ask about things you wanted. Some of Nis design decisions leave me scratching my head but they've implemented a ton of stuff that users have been asking for.
I haven't seen much around things like groove templates but round robin seems like a pretty standard thing and i wish they'd allow pad layering like Geist but i guess i'll have to use groups!
But i think most of maschine's updates have been user driven from about 1.5, the most requested stuff has been slowly added but things have been left out or changed in 2.0. I think it's a good upgrade if it's got what you want but yeah the forums are worth checking for stuff they changed in 2.0.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 187 posts since 17 Jan, 2006
You can now export a MIDI file on the sound level as well as group level. So for example, if you sliced to a pad, you would still have a single MIDI file for all your slices.topaz wrote:Seems NI have removed some features from 2.0 that would certainly mess me up, especially not exporting a single midi file ?
You can also batch export group MIDI files into a single MIDI file.