'Kernel memory leaking' Intel processor -- a serious cpu bug!?!
- KVRAF
- 4801 posts since 1 Aug, 2005 from Warszawa, Poland
Spectre attack check:
http://xlab.tencent.com/special/spectre ... check.html
I'm on un-patched Windows and not-updated Firefox. Result: not vulnerable. Hmmm....
http://xlab.tencent.com/special/spectre ... check.html
I'm on un-patched Windows and not-updated Firefox. Result: not vulnerable. Hmmm....
-
- KVRian
- 1062 posts since 3 Oct, 2011 from Christchurch, New Zealand
if you’re running a haswell or broadwell cpu it’s even worse - looks like the updated anti-spectre firmware is buggy and causing more issues than it fixes!Zombie Queen wrote:I'm not gonna touch firmware.
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3 ... stems.html
-
- KVRian
- 1062 posts since 3 Oct, 2011 from Christchurch, New Zealand
that indicates you HAVE correctly disabled both the spectre and meltdown mitigations (BTIWindowsSupportEnabled=FALSE and KVAShadowWindowsSupportEnabled=FALSE)Zero dB wrote:Thanks jdnz. I had a go with this but it's a little beyond my knowledge - I can't make out what it all actually means! Here's a screengrab: https://imgur.com/a/hrrhY
Any idea what this means?
Thanks again.
so your speed should be back to where it was - unless microsoft have done something silly in the updated BIOS which even without the BTI mitigations active is wrecking performance (entirely possible given the trainwreck that is the new broadwell/haswell microcode)
- KVRAF
- 4801 posts since 1 Aug, 2005 from Warszawa, Poland
I've seen reports on Woody's. It getting more and more embarrassing for Intel, and it looks like it's dragging Microsoft with it. Time to relax, grab some popcorn and see how it unrolls.jdnz wrote:if you’re running a haswell or broadwell cpu it’s even worse....
-
- KVRian
- 1062 posts since 3 Oct, 2011 from Christchurch, New Zealand
my current daw pc is an i7-4770 - it’s just over 4 years old so I did contemplate building a new machine with an 8 series cpu, but now I’m gonna wait for the 9 series in the hope that by then intel MIGHT have got things together (other possibility is it goes bankrupt from all the lawsuits/class actions)Zombie Queen wrote:I've seen reports on Woody's. It getting more and more embarrassing for Intel, and it looks like it's dragging Microsoft with it. Time to relax, grab some popcorn and see how it unrolls.jdnz wrote:if you’re running a haswell or broadwell cpu it’s even worse....
right now the cure is definitely worse than ‘risk’ of running unprotected
-
- KVRist
- 197 posts since 31 Dec, 2004 from London, UK
Thanks for the info. That IS super weird as the performance has definitely be decimated since I ran the patches and I notice no improvement whatsoever having tried to undo with the registry. Something does seem to be very rotten here - seems something awry with the BIOS update (undone from a protection point of a view but not a performance point of view?!).jdnz wrote:that indicates you HAVE correctly disabled both the spectre and meltdown mitigations (BTIWindowsSupportEnabled=FALSE and KVAShadowWindowsSupportEnabled=FALSE)Zero dB wrote:Thanks jdnz. I had a go with this but it's a little beyond my knowledge - I can't make out what it all actually means! Here's a screengrab: https://imgur.com/a/hrrhY
Any idea what this means?
Thanks again.
so your speed should be back to where it was - unless microsoft have done something silly in the updated BIOS which even without the BTI mitigations active is wrecking performance (entirely possible given the trainwreck that is the new broadwell/haswell microcode)
Fingers crossed they patch the, erm, patches...
ZdB
-
- KVRist
- 119 posts since 2 Dec, 2015
Can anyone confirm how the Haswell microcode updates are being distributed? Is it through Windows/Linux updates, or via manual BIOS updates?
I have a Haswell system, currently doing duty as a spare. The motherboard manufacturer has not released a new BIOS since all this blew up.
I have a Haswell system, currently doing duty as a spare. The motherboard manufacturer has not released a new BIOS since all this blew up.
- KVRian
- 1024 posts since 8 Mar, 2004 from Network 23
I'm not sure I'd trust an "attack check" from Tencent..Zombie Queen wrote:Spectre attack check:
http://xlab.tencent.com/special/spectre ... check.html
I'm on un-patched Windows and not-updated Firefox. Result: not vulnerable. Hmmm....
We shall see orchestral machines with a thousand new sounds, with thousands of new euphonies, as opposed to the present day's simple sounds of strings, brass, and woodwinds. -- George Antheil, circa 1925 ---
-
- KVRian
- 1062 posts since 3 Oct, 2011 from Christchurch, New Zealand
only via BIOS updates (via the system vendor)PapaLazarou wrote:Can anyone confirm how the Haswell microcode updates are being distributed? Is it through Windows/Linux updates, or via manual BIOS updates?
HP is being pretty good about it’s business machines and some consumer oriented motherboard makers are on to it (ASUS), but Gigabyte are shockers - basically only updated BIOS for intel 1xx series boards and later
for my h87 gigabyte board I’ll have to build a custom bios with the new microcode, which is always somewhat fraught
-
- KVRist
- 119 posts since 2 Dec, 2015
Thanks jdnz. Yes I've actually got a Gigabyte and MSI Z97 boards here, neither have released any updates yet. Not that I really want the microcode update if it's causing problems.
I did some digging myself and found this - https://downloadcenter.intel.com/downlo ... -Data-File - of any interest? Also - https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums ... ?p=4420456 Seems you can update it via Linux at least.
Sounds a bit advanced and scaryfor my h87 gigabyte board I’ll have to build a custom bios with the new microcode, which is always somewhat fraught
-
- KVRian
- 1062 posts since 3 Oct, 2011 from Christchurch, New Zealand
on linux you can d/l the updated microcode during boot, on windows it HAS to be updated in BIOS so it's available whilst bootingPapaLazarou wrote:I did some digging myself and found this - https://downloadcenter.intel.com/downlo ... -Data-File - of any interest? Also - https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums ... ?p=4420456 Seems you can update it via Linux at least.
-
- KVRist
- 119 posts since 2 Dec, 2015
I see. Thanks. I think that was something I was misunderstanding about these updates - nothing is updated on the processor itself, correct? It's not like a "firmware" update exactly. If I moved a CPU from a system with a microcode update applied in BIOS to another system which didn't have that update applied, the CPU would revert to it's pre-update behaviour presumably?
-
Patrice Brousseau Patrice Brousseau https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8980
- KVRist
- 134 posts since 13 Sep, 2003 from Montréal, Canada
You can update the microcode yourself in the BIOS but I'll wait as the 23h for Haswell looks buggy...
Patrice Brousseau
- KVRAF
- 3303 posts since 27 Mar, 2010 from UK
Fwiw uplate bios to 1004 on the Asus x299a board with 7820x cpu. The Intel checker still reports system as vulnerable. So no idea what's going on?