this gets presented a lot as one of the only upsides (it's already happened in this thread, a few times). and, while your post is a well-rounded, and fair assessment, i wanted to counter this pointmidi sentinel wrote:I presume whoever would like to do things quickly and efficiently would go for it.
it is true that the type of working composer that this instrument 'seems' aimed at will indeed value speed and efficiency, but that is not coveted at the expense of the overall sound. it's the sounds that people use it for. that it is fast and efficient is down to the design and implementation of certain features, and not just as an afterthought, looking for some way to praise it - "well, it's expensive and doesn't really sound 'analogue', but all those professional composers care about efficiency more than sound.....
'quick' and 'efficient' are not words i ever want to associate with my music, and yet i value omnisphere greatly in my music. it's all about the sound and flexibility for me

