Quite a big disadvantage in Cubase SX3 !!!!!

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Correction:
that adapter (dvi to s-video) might be included in the package. But it is even though a less elegant solution.

Post

I just picked up the latest Sound on Sound.. there's a 3 page "technique" article covering rendering VST instrument parts using SX.

The same instructions for Tracktion would barely make a paragraph :hihi:

(and Tracktion would provide seperate time stamped BWAVS with suitable names.. the method described in SoS results in all parts being combined into one really long audio file which presumably then needs to be manually chopped up and re-arranged in whatever host you mix in :nutter:)

Post

That is good to know about Tracktion, i just found a demo. so far it seems promising.

Post

OMU wrote:Correction:
that adapter (dvi to s-video) might be included in the package. But it is even though a less elegant solution.
It's far more elegant than building myriad different dedicated video out ports into the laptop.

Post

IIRs wrote:I just picked up the latest Sound on Sound.. there's a 3 page "technique" article covering rendering VST instrument parts using SX.

The same instructions for Tracktion would barely make a paragraph :hihi:

(and Tracktion would provide seperate time stamped BWAVS with suitable names.. the method described in SoS results in all parts being combined into one really long audio file which presumably then needs to be manually chopped up and re-arranged in whatever host you mix in :nutter:)
You really know about ellegance monkeyboy, but sophystication is something that passes you by like
a lot.

BTW do you know how many logic users are needed to spam a forum???
All of them but with the aid of some traktion users as well. :hihi: :hihi:

Post

IIRs wrote:I just picked up the latest Sound on Sound.. there's a 3 page "technique" article covering rendering VST instrument parts using SX.

The same instructions for Tracktion would barely make a paragraph :hihi:

(and Tracktion would provide seperate time stamped BWAVS with suitable names.. the method described in SoS results in all parts being combined into one really long audio file which presumably then needs to be manually chopped up and re-arranged in whatever host you mix in :nutter:)
Really? How do you render VSTi in Traktion? (I'm actually curious)

Post

just how is rendering VSTi somehow difficult in SX3?

there's two choices, freeze, and individual track rendering (export). The latter I've assigned under a shortcut. I point at a track and press the shortcut. voila.

I suppose t2 will read your mind so you won't have to click anything if it's that much easier? :hihi:

Post

I have a serious question about the difference between SX 2 and 3. I admit I haven't kept track of all the Cubase discussions here, but from what little I've seen, alot of people prefer SX 2.

Is this true?

I'm geniunely curious, as I've been toying with the idea of working with Cubase again.

Cheers,
D
Image
Jens, "B.t.w.: it appears I was wrong"

Post

bduffy wrote: How do you render VSTi in Traktion? (I'm actually curious)
Select the track and press the "render" button. :hihi:
Kingston wrote:just how is rendering VSTi somehow difficult in SX3?


You have to manually solo the MIDI track, then export a wav file which then needs naming manually. The point of the 3 page article was a workaround that could export many such tracks without needing so much manual input..

.. of course in Tracktion you just tick the "render each track to a seperate file" option in the export dialogue! :D

Post

Sickle wrote:I have a serious question about the difference between SX 2 and 3. I admit I haven't kept track of all the Cubase discussions here, but from what little I've seen, alot of people prefer SX 2.

Is this true?

I'm geniunely curious, as I've been toying with the idea of working with Cubase again.

Cheers,
D
We have Nuendo 3 at work (same diff) and it's basically the same. As soon as I can drum up the cash, I'm moving to SX 3-land, the new features are excellent. The first release was bumpy (as always?), but I think most SX 3'ers are happy now.

Post

The difference is quite minimal really. Have a look at the "new features of SX3" by steinberg. I doubt there's much there you'll absolutely need.

YMMV vary but to me SX3 is the most stable cubase ever. (although you have to put that statement to steinberg reputation perspective :hihi: )

Post

IIRs wrote:
bduffy wrote: How do you render VSTi in Traktion? (I'm actually curious)
Select the track and press the "render" button. :hihi:
Kingston wrote:just how is rendering VSTi somehow difficult in SX3?


You have to manually solo the MIDI track, then export a wav file which then needs naming manually. The point of the 3 page article was a workaround that could export many such tracks without needing so much manual input..

.. of course in Tracktion you just tick the "render each track to a seperate file" option in the export dialogue! :D
Yeah, that's easier than Cubase. You gotta admit, Kingston: aren't there times where you wish you could just hit "render" and it just adds the file to the Pool - which it needs to do anyway - instead of having to solo, navigate to your project folder, make sure you have the exact file specs...personally, I've always found this senselessly tedious, especially because of the Pool concept.

Now something that should level the playing field a bit is "Freeze", as you can freeze a VSTi and just keep the file. But I, for one, like the Traktion method much better.

Post

bduffy wrote:Yeah, that's easier than Cubase. You gotta admit, Kingston: aren't there times where you wish you could just hit "render" and it just adds the file to the Pool
But it does just that with a keypress, throws it into a pool and the project folder and creates a new track for it. I fail to see the trouble or slowness here. Usually I just freeze them though.

Could be I've become quite a machine with direct neural link to the keyshortcuts :hihi: . It was the same with logic and shortcuts back in the day.

Post

Kingston wrote:
bduffy wrote:Yeah, that's easier than Cubase. You gotta admit, Kingston: aren't there times where you wish you could just hit "render" and it just adds the file to the Pool
But it does just that with a keypress, throws it into a pool and the project folder and creates a new track for it. I fail to see the trouble or slowness here. Usually I just freeze them though.

Could be I've become quite a machine with direct neural link to the keyshortcuts :hihi: . It was the same with logic and shortcuts back in the day.
OK, maybe I'm missing something or got used to the "old ways", but here's what I do:

Solo VSTi:
Shortcut: "Export Audio"
Dialogue comes up, select filename, samplerate, tick off "Export to...Pool and/or Track"
Render File
File appears in Cubase.

What do you do?

Post

bduffy wrote:
File appears in Cubase.
Perhaps I should mention: the object of the excercise was to get the whole arrangement into Pro-Tools because the author doesn't like mixing in Cubase.

:hihi:

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”