Cubase 11 available now
- KVRAF
- 2960 posts since 9 Dec, 2011 from falling
Am I the only one who just loves the Cubase interface?
Bitwig Certified Trainer
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
No
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
-
- Pick Me Pick me!
- 10234 posts since 12 Mar, 2002 from a state of confusion
It's the only DAW that clicked for me near instantly. It just makes sense. It has it's own identity of sorts and I hope it continues to keep it, despite the naysayers that want it to be something that it isn't.
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
2 things I don't like
1) Having the stupid apple windowing/master bar is god awful.
2) 10 years later and the key commands between the main page and mixconsole are still borked. And the tabbing focus has actually made that problem worse, not better.
With that said, I beta test software on multiple DAWs and hands down I'll take the Cubase UI.
1) Having the stupid apple windowing/master bar is god awful.
2) 10 years later and the key commands between the main page and mixconsole are still borked. And the tabbing focus has actually made that problem worse, not better.
With that said, I beta test software on multiple DAWs and hands down I'll take the Cubase UI.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
- KVRist
- 227 posts since 14 Jul, 2019
I don't know why but Cubase just clicks for me. Upgrading/installation is the worst of the industry.

-
- KVRian
- 750 posts since 3 May, 2018
The entire music industry sucks ass for the most part in the installation and DRM dept - years behind in so many ways, always have been. Other than that, CHTT wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:16 pmI don't know why but Cubase just clicks for me. Upgrading/installation is the worst of the industry.
![]()
Have you tried Vital?
-
- KVRAF
- 4584 posts since 21 Sep, 2005
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Music software isn't perfect, that's for sure... nothing like Photoshop, or MS Word or Excel in it. Most of the software has its flaws and its good sides. So... it's rather about picking the one with the least flaws, and the most upsides.Psuper wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 11:26 pm The entire music industry sucks ass for the most part in the installation and DRM dept - years behind in so many ways, always have been.
- KVRist
- 227 posts since 14 Jul, 2019
So, I upgraded to Artist 11 after 90 minutes of labor including changing passwords, etc.. I get a boatload of content. Yay! I now get no midi input or audio output. WTF!? Now even my 10.5 is blocked from midi input and audio output. Gotta love Steinberg! They are absolutely great, but at the same time, they suck worse than everyone else by a country mile. Steinberg= abusive spouse syndrome in audio/midi company form.
Last edited by HTT on Fri Nov 20, 2020 12:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 4584 posts since 21 Sep, 2005
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
For me, a huge part of not coveting other DAWs is the GUI of Cubendo. I have obtained a few of the others, and it was usually kind of jarring.
I don't think Studio One's is that bad but it's not great IMO. Logic, it's not hard to get around in it, but... did they ever decide to do a dark mode? It's hard to look at, I need contrast. I don't see great.
I wanted to like Digital Performer for a couple of actual reasons, and no.
(I also color code things for easier recognition at a glance, and I like that I can control the backgrounds and everything.)
My first session with 11, it crashed two or three times when I was doing just about nothing. Last night I used it and it was fine.
It's not more efficient on a kind of a bear of a project like this one, I don't think, but no big surprises.
I love the bezier curve implementation in Key Editor, particularly as to pitch bend lane. And I never cared much about it for automation.
And having the Tempo Track as a lane in there is kind of a big deal for me.
Just now I wasn't sure how much of the additional stuff with C11 I had installed, so I went to cover that, and found the .pkg installers failed while installation inside the Download Ass't worked A-OK. Damn glad they segregated all that from the application itself, esp if the download speed is like it is at the moment.
Unsure why there are 4 flavors of Halion SE content now, I guess it wasn't convoluted enough before.
I don't think Studio One's is that bad but it's not great IMO. Logic, it's not hard to get around in it, but... did they ever decide to do a dark mode? It's hard to look at, I need contrast. I don't see great.
I wanted to like Digital Performer for a couple of actual reasons, and no.
(I also color code things for easier recognition at a glance, and I like that I can control the backgrounds and everything.)
My first session with 11, it crashed two or three times when I was doing just about nothing. Last night I used it and it was fine.
It's not more efficient on a kind of a bear of a project like this one, I don't think, but no big surprises.
I love the bezier curve implementation in Key Editor, particularly as to pitch bend lane. And I never cared much about it for automation.
And having the Tempo Track as a lane in there is kind of a big deal for me.
Just now I wasn't sure how much of the additional stuff with C11 I had installed, so I went to cover that, and found the .pkg installers failed while installation inside the Download Ass't worked A-OK. Damn glad they segregated all that from the application itself, esp if the download speed is like it is at the moment.
Unsure why there are 4 flavors of Halion SE content now, I guess it wasn't convoluted enough before.
- KVRAF
- 2990 posts since 13 Apr, 2008 from Charleston, SC
For me, as a kid in the 80's, and surrounded by hardware studios...
Cubase/Nuendo feels the closest to the hardware studio. It is like working with the hardware. The workflow is so close to hardware. And tape. It feels like I am working with tape.
Tape. Hardware. Cutape. Nuhardware.
Cubase/Nuendo feels the closest to the hardware studio. It is like working with the hardware. The workflow is so close to hardware. And tape. It feels like I am working with tape.
Tape. Hardware. Cutape. Nuhardware.
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
Yeah, I think this is the big dividing line between lovers and haters. If you want a clip/modular approach then it really isn't any good. But if you record external gear augmented by VSTi or do heavy orchestration, it's hard to beat. It just feels right. Of course I've been using it since the VST 32 days.... Although I despised the SX days.thejonsolo wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:52 am For me, as a kid in the 80's, and surrounded by hardware studios...
Cubase/Nuendo feels the closest to the hardware studio. It is like working with the hardware. The workflow is so close to hardware. And tape. It feels like I am working with tape.
Tape. Hardware. Cutape. Nuhardware.
So saying, I know amazing composers that work in other DAWs to include the clip launcher ones. So, different strokes and all that. I just find the overall, combined workflow of the editors and project view to be extremely comfortable and mostly obvious.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer