Picking a DAW is hard…
- KVRAF
- 7664 posts since 2 Sep, 2019
I get that, but the discussion about Cubase's price came from a claim that it "offers the most bang for the buck." I don't think Cubase could ever win in that department, new or used. I mean, even I would readily admit that the feature per dollar award can only go to Reaper. But that's no way to pick a DAW anyways. The only features that matter are the ones that work the way you do.
THIS MUSIC HAS BEEN MIXED TO BE PLAYED LOUD SO TURN IT UP
- KVRer
- 24 posts since 18 Aug, 2025
I recently decided to start on a new DAW after years of using cubase, logic and sonar. I did a long comparison of many aspects and compared all daws through the help of chatgpt, and the winner was Bitwig. Haven't made the jump yet as I'm switching studios but it's apparently the daw with the most capabilities (with reapers) and also with the most modern, stable and powerful engine and workflow. It's also the most recent one which means its code has not been stacked upon itself for generations of updates, potentially generating bugs and slowness and relying on outdated processes like scripts. It's also decently priced at only 99€ and the developers seem brilliant and active. Maybe you should give another chance to the UI, anyway I'll give you my impressions soon, good luck on your choice!
Galatians 4:16 "So then, have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?"
-
- KVRer
- 1 posts since 29 Aug, 2025
Après avoir passé beaucoup de temps (trop ...) à chercher le DAW qui m'apporterait le plus de satisfactions, j'ai choisi REAPER.
Les possibilités sont si vastes qu'au début, on peut se perdre dans l'apprentissage de son utilisation.
J'en sais aujourd'hui assez sur ce programme pour affirmer qu'il s'adaptera a toutes situations. Sa conception modulaire en fait un outil polyvalent et performant en termes de latences. Je ne suis pas là pour "faire l'article" mais simplement partager mon avis d'utilisateur exigeant. Un DAW, c'est comme un voiture, il y a la carrosserie et le moteur (pour faire simple) après, on considère le confort, les performances, les options, l'instrumentation ... . Aucun problème, REAPER tient la route, sur tous les terrains, et pour longtemps .
Les possibilités sont si vastes qu'au début, on peut se perdre dans l'apprentissage de son utilisation.
J'en sais aujourd'hui assez sur ce programme pour affirmer qu'il s'adaptera a toutes situations. Sa conception modulaire en fait un outil polyvalent et performant en termes de latences. Je ne suis pas là pour "faire l'article" mais simplement partager mon avis d'utilisateur exigeant. Un DAW, c'est comme un voiture, il y a la carrosserie et le moteur (pour faire simple) après, on considère le confort, les performances, les options, l'instrumentation ... . Aucun problème, REAPER tient la route, sur tous les terrains, et pour longtemps .
- KVRist
- 202 posts since 26 Jul, 2023 from France
Qu'est-ce que ce serait si tu étais là pour "faire l'article" 
-
lifesubstance36 lifesubstance36 https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=763287
- KVRer
- 3 posts since 20 Aug, 2025
I prefer Ableton personally... one thing to keep in mind is potential collaborators. If you plan to collaborate with friends or other musicians in your space, see what they are using more as being in the same DAW makes things much easier 
-
- KVRian
- 1365 posts since 2 Mar, 2018
The only comparison AI can do is give you strict black n white facts...there's no way it can tell you which DAW is best, as that's subjective. The only way to know which is best is to try out as many as possible and find out first hand.
-
Hugh Allwright Hugh Allwright https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=766989
- KVRer
- 3 posts since 23 Sep, 2025
Probably because it's a bit difficult for the average person to navigate.Scrubbing Monkeys wrote: Fri Nov 17, 2023 9:16 am Oddly enough.....Pro Tools .....''the choice of the industry'' is NEVER a part of the discussions.
- KVRAF
- 3815 posts since 20 Apr, 2005
I use Bitwig after having used Cubase for years.SybilSztorm wrote: Mon Aug 18, 2025 3:36 am I recently decided to start on a new DAW after years of using cubase, logic and sonar. I did a long comparison of many aspects and compared all daws through the help of chatgpt, and the winner was Bitwig. Haven't made the jump yet as I'm switching studios but it's apparently the daw with the most capabilities (with reapers) and also with the most modern, stable and powerful engine and workflow. It's also the most recent one which means its code has not been stacked upon itself for generations of updates, potentially generating bugs and slowness and relying on outdated processes like scripts. It's also decently priced at only 99€ and the developers seem brilliant and active. Maybe you should give another chance to the UI, anyway I'll give you my impressions soon, good luck on your choice!
For me the work flow is just insanely good, and it seems to have also stepped up with v6 beta. If i have to go back to Cubase these days it just feels very slow and clunky to do most things in comparison.
I highly recommend Bitwig.
-
- KVRian
- 1400 posts since 7 Oct, 2023 from Tokyo
I agree. I use Reaper, Logic, and Bitwig and at this point have gone all in on Bitwig. The workflow, the focus on modulation, the range of builtins combined with excellent plugin support, and the UI all add up to being very comfortable for me.
- KVRian
- 1157 posts since 20 Oct, 2023
I would shit my pants if a CLAP/VST version of Bitwig came out with just the modular capabilties. Call it The GRID. So no audio recording just all the modular capabilities including all instruments and effects.
Imagine The GRID VST inside Reaper. Or Ableton Live so one can use The GRID and M4L together. Ouch.
Imagine The GRID VST inside Reaper. Or Ableton Live so one can use The GRID and M4L together. Ouch.
-
- KVRer
- 1 posts since 1 Sep, 2025
FL + Logic!