KVR Audio

Sascha Franck · Post by **Sascha Franck** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:32 pm

Killvehicle wrote:Sascha, what do I know, but the second synth section sounded best(most swing) to me.

Well, if you think so. Compared by a grid, it doesn't suit as well as 8ths. All other offbeat 8ths fall closer to straight 8ths. And it's exactly how I want it to be.

nuffink · Post by **nuffink** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:34 pm

Hink wrote:so perhaps instead of swing=triplets, it could be said "swing can also be thought of as triplets without the middle note"...which as I see it can be an adaptation or another way of looking at it, but not exactly faking....correct me if I'm wrong though...tbh that definition would bring a little clarification to swing in a physical sense.

I think it would be more correct to say that "swing sometimes gets taught to the particulary dim by the particularly lazy as triplets with a hole in the middle".

A bit like polos.

Killvehicle · Post by **Killvehicle** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:36 pm

Sascha Franck wrote:
Killvehicle wrote:Sascha, what do I know, but the second synth section sounded best(most swing) to me.
Well, if you think so. Compared by a grid, it doesn't suit as well as 8ths. All other offbeat 8ths fall closer to straight 8ths. And it's exactly how I want it to be.

BY grid?? Maybe by this justification it is true, but I'm only going by ear and what sounds best to me, this is when I throw theory out the window. BTW to clarify I am speaking of the 1 and 3 of the triplet being played/

Sascha Franck · Post by **Sascha Franck** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:38 pm

Killvehicle wrote: BY grid?? Maybe by this justification it is true, but I'm only going by ear and what sounds best to me, this is when I throw theory out the window. BTW to clarify I am speaking of the 1 and 3 of the triplet being played/

I know which pattern you were speaking about. And I don't give a damn about grids either, just that in this case the grid comparison is backing up what I hear as well.

Hink · Post by **Hink** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:40 pm

okay, now for me the introduction of the changes on the the 2nd, 3rd and 4th parts is very static and throws off the groove...

Killvehicle · Post by **Killvehicle** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:42 pm

Hink wrote:okay, now for me the introduction of the changes on the the 2nd, 3rd and 4th parts is very static and throws off the groove...

I think it was meant to be, It was only showing different grooves that would stick out like a sore thumb, at least thats what I figure.

Sascha Franck · Post by **Sascha Franck** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:45 pm

Killvehicle wrote: I think it was meant to be, It was only showing different grooves that would stick out like a sore thumb, at least thats what I figure.

Yeah, exactly. I was just trying to show that neither triplets nor straight 8ths would fit. But, using 8ths I would at least be able to write a proper sheet.

Amberience · Post by **Amberience** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:46 pm

Can I just ask one question - how is all this bickering helping music?

vurt · Post by **vurt** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:46 pm

it dont mean a thing if it aint got dem triplets...

vurt · Post by **vurt** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:46 pm

Amberience wrote:Can I just ask one question - how is all this bickering helping music?

its called passion i guess.

Hink · Post by **Hink** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:47 pm

Sascha Franck wrote:
Killvehicle wrote: I think it was meant to be, It was only showing different grooves that would stick out like a sore thumb, at least thats what I figure.
Yeah, exactly. I was just trying to show that neither triplets nor straight 8ths would fit. But, using 8ths I would at least be able to write a proper sheet.

that's what I thought...fwiw I only listen to it on my lappy speakers

Amberience · Post by **Amberience** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:48 pm

vurt wrote:
Amberience wrote:Can I just ask one question - how is all this bickering helping music?

its called passion i guess.

If this is passion then I summise that you don't need passion in music.

Killvehicle · Post by **Killvehicle** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:49 pm

Amberience wrote:
vurt wrote:
Amberience wrote:Can I just ask one question - how is all this bickering helping music?

its called passion i guess.
If this is passion then I summise that you don't need passion in music.

No, its called wasting time..

nuffink · Post by **nuffink** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:50 pm

Amberience wrote:
vurt wrote:
Amberience wrote:Can I just ask one question - how is all this bickering helping music?

its called passion i guess.
If this is passion then I summise that you don't need passion in music.

Despite, or maybe because of the elevated noise floor, there's more hard musical knowledge in this thread than in most of the rest of the place put together.

Why do you bother?

Amberience · Post by **Amberience** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:51 pm

Killvehicle wrote:
Amberience wrote:
vurt wrote:
Amberience wrote:Can I just ask one question - how is all this bickering helping music?

its called passion i guess.
If this is passion then I summise that you don't need passion in music.
No, its called wasting time..

I can think of better ways of wasting time. You could hire a prossie, f**k her or him without a nodder, get aids, then waste lots and lots of your time fighting it.

Or you could have a wank.

Or you could eat some pretzels.

Or you could play chess with yourself.

Help on understanding time signatures.