My question is can SF output the beatslices/Cuepoints with the wavefiles (I've never used it).. Audition is good for this.. Also are there any other audio apps that recognize these slices other than FL, Acid and CUE list tool??
C
Audition vs. Sound Forge
-
Reverend Rhythm Reverend Rhythm https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=6041
- KVRAF
- 2859 posts since 21 Feb, 2003 from Woodstock, GA USA
I'm not quite sure of your question, but let me try. SF can "acidize" a loop (set tempo and key), which would mean that it would write the markers for the beats. But it will not edit those markers. I use acid for that.
Now I may be missing something there, because that's just the way I work. I use SF for trimimg and editing, and then acid for editing the markers. BTW< editing the markers is very important if you want to change the loop over a larger range.
Now I may be missing something there, because that's just the way I work. I use SF for trimimg and editing, and then acid for editing the markers. BTW< editing the markers is very important if you want to change the loop over a larger range.
-
- KVRAF
- 4222 posts since 23 Feb, 2004 from Tucson Arizona USA
Since the vendor does not have a signed and notarized copy of that EULA to show you agreed to it, it has no binding status. Even if the license were binding, it would not supersede copyright law or other legal authority under which it is granted. As I said, it's an open question in the US. Nobody has ever been sucessfully prosecuted for a mere "EULA Violation" which was not *also* a violation of applicable law. Essentially, you do not get to create laws by writing a unilateral contract.M'Snah wrote: Since you can only use the software after accepting the EULA...
-
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
I dunno, I have no reason to doubt you James, but I think if it came down to something critical besides a debate online I would surely check with a lawyer before spliiting legal hairs ...james0tucson wrote:Since the vendor does not have a signed and notarized copy of that EULA to show you agreed to it, it has no binding status. Even if the license were binding, it would not supersede copyright law or other legal authority under which it is granted. As I said, it's an open question in the US. Nobody has ever been sucessfully prosecuted for a mere "EULA Violation" which was not *also* a violation of applicable law. Essentially, you do not get to create laws by writing a unilateral contract.M'Snah wrote: Since you can only use the software after accepting the EULA...
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- Banned
- 761 posts since 7 Dec, 2005
what if you already are oneHink wrote:I dunno, I have no reason to doubt you James, but I think if it came down to something critical besides a debate online I would surely check with a lawyer before spliiting legal hairs ...james0tucson wrote:Since the vendor does not have a signed and notarized copy of that EULA to show you agreed to it, it has no binding status. Even if the license were binding, it would not supersede copyright law or other legal authority under which it is granted. As I said, it's an open question in the US. Nobody has ever been sucessfully prosecuted for a mere "EULA Violation" which was not *also* a violation of applicable law. Essentially, you do not get to create laws by writing a unilateral contract.M'Snah wrote: Since you can only use the software after accepting the EULA...
-
- KVRian
- 882 posts since 12 Mar, 2002 from London - UK
Some of you may be interested- create digital music blog reported that BIAS inc have released a white paper on resampling quality in audio editors having fixed some issues in their new peak pro 5 version.
Note that this only tests one specific aspect of the quality of the audio editor (the sample rate conversion), and also that there are probably free third party utilities to do sample rate conversion as well. EDIT: Both Audition and Sound Forge perform above averagely at the task, Audition appearing to do slightly better.
Note that this only tests one specific aspect of the quality of the audio editor (the sample rate conversion), and also that there are probably free third party utilities to do sample rate conversion as well. EDIT: Both Audition and Sound Forge perform above averagely at the task, Audition appearing to do slightly better.