KVR Audio

Without · Post by **Without** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:22 pm

I love the website design!

sinkmusic · Post by **sinkmusic** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:28 pm

nice website.

audiojunkie · Post by **audiojunkie** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:30 pm

Ok then <GRIN>, I'm obviously outvoted.

--Sean

vurt · Post by **vurt** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:32 pm

stk wrote:..yeah so it's reissue month at the adNi skunklabs..

CYX2 takes music, makes noise. Noise is good, no?

sk.

if i knew a word that meant ten times awesome now would be the time to use it.
unfortunatly i dont so
awesome x 10

love the new gui

Liquidclear · Post by **Liquidclear** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 4:18 pm

Can't wait to try this one out...I know it's gonna be good!

vurt · Post by **vurt** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 4:41 pm

LiquidClear wrote:Can't wait to try this one out...I know it's gonna be good!

it is, ive just lost an afternoon fuckin shit up

PTV · Post by **PTV** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 5:09 pm

Without wrote:I love the website design!

Me too. Please don't change it

diverdee · Post by **diverdee** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 5:33 pm

I quite like the website also, simple functional - nothing wrong with that.

diversheat · Post by **diversheat** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 5:44 pm

sinkmusic wrote:
diverdee wrote:
vstDOG wrote:well...for me it shows up only as an instrument (CubaseSX3)...
therefore I can't get a sound out of it
any ideas??

vstDOG
Can you not route audio from an audio channel into the vsti channel in SX as a workaround for now?
Same thing in Live5.
Yes, i can do it, but it takes an empty track for nothing (so, also some screen space), and i can only put it in a track, not as an insert, so i can't use Cyclotron as well as i could/would like...
Very nicce plugin indeed

Put it into EnergyXt. It has to work as effect then.

xoxos · Post by **xoxos** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:15 pm

how about 'rerelease it/release alt. v. w/o a midi in..' and allow the user to automate it with their host's features..

then i also would be able to actually use it :p

audiojunkie · Post by **audiojunkie** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:25 pm

xoxos wrote:how about 'rerelease it/release alt. v. w/o a midi in..' and allow the user to automate it with their host's features..

then i also would be able to actually use it :p

Yes please!

That would help me a lot too.

--Sean

stk · Post by **stk** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:32 pm

okay, am fixing incorrect vst-i issue today, will post here when done.

sk

stk · Post by **stk** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:34 pm

snooky wrote:where do I find the required font then?
now the GUI looks a bit off

sheesh, I'm sooo glad I spent those hours on the doco

the fonr is in the install dir - it's called PixelEx.ttf

sk

stk · Post by **stk** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:35 pm

xoxos wrote:how about 'rerelease it/release alt. v. w/o a midi in..' and allow the user to automate it with their host's features..

then i also would be able to actually use it :p

can you not automate it then? what host are you using?

stk · Post by **stk** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:42 pm

audiojunkie wrote:Just one thing. Stk, could you PLEASE change your website? It is so strange! I'm sure that others might like it, but I've always ignored your website, until I saw that picture you posted in this thread. I can't help but wonder if others have also equated the way the website looks and works with how your plug-ins look and work. It can be really mis-leading in a bad way for you. Just a friendly suggestion. Please don't take it the wrong way.

Heh, if I was actually relying on the website to sell things, I would care how it's perceived. As it is, it's not as if I'm in a race to get more downloads, my host is grumbling enough as it is.. And I'd like to keep adNi at least partially underground..

btw, the site looks correct in ie. Looks shite in firefox, I must fix that sometime, should know better..

sk

adNi Cyclotron X2