I don't know if it'd amount to too much but i'd love to know what patches were affected. I asume it was mostly the loops?spectrum wrote:Unfortunately, mucho copyright problems with third party supplied samples on that one. Numerous high profile lawsuits, etc. It was the only "recalled" Roland product that I'm aware of. Major headache for everyone in Roland Sound Development in those days. We stopped doing third party stuff the same way after that nightmare.Kim Olesen wrote:As far as jv stories. Tell us what the real deal with the dance expansion was. (i have one which i bought before it was withdrawn)
Using the samples on that board on a commercial release is quite dangerous it turned out! So although it's highly prized these days, watch out on using it because it got a number of Roland end users into lawsuits.
I learned a lot about copyright law from having to deal with that problem though....very useful info for my later adventures into my own sound business.
Is Roland JV1080 still worth buying?
-
- KVRist
- 293 posts since 2 Aug, 2002 from Odense - Denmark
And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make.
-
- KVRian
- 1096 posts since 31 Aug, 2001 from Los Angeles, California
Most of Roland's stuff works that way. A few products use a higher sample-rate of 44.1k, like the JD-800/990, but most use the lower rate to squeeze in more or longer sounds.Kim Olesen wrote:spectrum wrote: Wow. there must be something going on in that engine. t just sounds so good to my ears.
We're pretty spoiled in the software world.
-
- KVRian
- 1096 posts since 31 Aug, 2001 from Los Angeles, California
I can't get into specifics, but there were problems with numerous sounds, not only the loops. Many of the third-party sounds were probably clean too, but the problem was that it was impossible to determine which was clean or not....so they pulled the whole thing and started being much more strict about checking sources and sample clearance, documentation, etc. in the future.Kim Olesen wrote: I don't know if it'd amount to too much but i'd love to know what patches were affected. I asume it was mostly the loops?
-
- KVRian
- 1005 posts since 1 Apr, 2002 from Spain
I still got my JV, but haven't used it for 5 years - that's when I started using VST's for everything 
It's a really great synth for sure, and I'd get one myself if it's not for that I prefer using as little hardware as possible.
Now we're talking about it: What excactly did the spectrum effect do? I remember using it to get a pretty-ok sounding 303-distortion.
I also had the dance board, but sold it. It was nice to have back then as an alternative to my AKAI sampler, cause it had all the 808's and 909's coming out through the same outputs as the rest, but other than that, I never found it that special.
How has it been proven, btw, when people were using the uncleared loops from the dance board? I mean, these were taken from sample cd's, as far as I remember, and nobody forces you to prove that you didn't use a JV for that stuff in your song, but the original sample-cd...
It's a really great synth for sure, and I'd get one myself if it's not for that I prefer using as little hardware as possible.
Now we're talking about it: What excactly did the spectrum effect do? I remember using it to get a pretty-ok sounding 303-distortion.
I also had the dance board, but sold it. It was nice to have back then as an alternative to my AKAI sampler, cause it had all the 808's and 909's coming out through the same outputs as the rest, but other than that, I never found it that special.
How has it been proven, btw, when people were using the uncleared loops from the dance board? I mean, these were taken from sample cd's, as far as I remember, and nobody forces you to prove that you didn't use a JV for that stuff in your song, but the original sample-cd...
Best Regards
Roman Empire
Roman Empire
-
- KVRian
- 1096 posts since 31 Aug, 2001 from Los Angeles, California
It's pretty simple. The manufacturer that release the sounds is legally responsible.Roman Empire wrote: How has it been proven, btw, when people were using the uncleared loops from the dance board? I mean, these were taken from sample cd's, as far as I remember, and nobody forces you to prove that you didn't use a JV for that stuff in your song, but the original sample-cd...
So everyone gets wrapped up in the lawsuits that way. Just because someone else provided the uncleared source sample doesn't mean the end manufacturer is exempt from prosecution.
That's why fully documented sample clearance is so important. It protects everyone.
-
- KVRAF
- 3158 posts since 2 Jul, 2005 from Stuck in the closet
spectrum wrote:Yep...we sucked pretty bad. Guess that's why all those Roland synths we did were so unsuccessful....Roland really needs to fire its preset guys.
spectrum
Ah man. That's great. I had no idea there was a Roland preset guy roaming these parts.
Hehehe... oh man.
You can't take what I say too seriously, because I'm only joking when I say Roland needs to fire its preset guys. I do hate those Roland presets, though. Sorry, man.
Oh man, that made me laugh. But you obviously didn't take what I said too seriously, so that's good.
Mizutaphile.
-
- KVRian
- 1005 posts since 1 Apr, 2002 from Spain
Ok, so are you saying that the original sample-cd was not cleared either?spectrum wrote:It's pretty simple. The manufacturer that release the sounds is legally responsible.Roman Empire wrote: How has it been proven, btw, when people were using the uncleared loops from the dance board? I mean, these were taken from sample cd's, as far as I remember, and nobody forces you to prove that you didn't use a JV for that stuff in your song, but the original sample-cd...
So everyone gets wrapped up in the lawsuits that way. Just because someone else provided the uncleared source sample doesn't mean the end manufacturer is exempt from prosecution.
That's why fully documented sample clearance is so important. It protects everyone.
Best Regards
Roman Empire
Roman Empire
-
- KVRian
- 1096 posts since 31 Aug, 2001 from Los Angeles, California
No problem at all...to each his own and I know very well that's impossible to please everyone.Ildon wrote:spectrum wrote:Yep...we sucked pretty bad. Guess that's why all those Roland synths we did were so unsuccessful....Roland really needs to fire its preset guys.
spectrum![]()
Ah man. That's great. I had no idea there was a Roland preset guy roaming these parts.![]()
Hehehe... oh man.
You can't take what I say too seriously, because I'm only joking when I say Roland needs to fire its preset guys. I do hate those Roland presets, though. Sorry, man.I can only imagine how it must've been to have to make whole banks of presets and learn the synth in what was probably a very short amount of time. In a sense, I can kind of sympathize and understand that a person can't make magic after only having a synth for a week or a even a month.
Oh man, that made me laugh. But you obviously didn't take what I said too seriously, so that's good.
My guess is that you most likely dig something I've made at some point, since my tastes are pretty eclectic. The 1080 stuff was done a long time ago and is a pretty small set of the sounds I've made over the years:
http://www.spectrasonics.net/artists/epersing.php
http://www.spectrasonics.net/artists/roland.php
And hey...the hip-hop guys loved that same stuff!
spectrum:-)
-
- KVRAF
- 3158 posts since 2 Jul, 2005 from Stuck in the closet
Oh, you're the guy behind Atmosphere? Cool! I do like Atmosphere's sound. There was a time where I was saving up for it and Stylus RMX, but I never got around to buying either of them because I went down the GM/VGM route with my music. I had no idea you were so prolific. That's really neat.

Mizutaphile.
-
- KVRian
- 1096 posts since 31 Aug, 2001 from Los Angeles, California
Yup.Ildon wrote:Oh, you're the guy behind Atmosphere? Cool!
I do like Atmosphere's sound.
Good! That's certainly much more of a personal creation.
...just been doin this for a while now....There was a time where I was saving up for it and Stylus RMX, but I never got around to buying either of them because I went down the GM/VGM route with my music. I had no idea you were so prolific. That's really neat.![]()
Last edited by spectrum on Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRian
- 1096 posts since 31 Aug, 2001 from Los Angeles, California
Well....yes...all of them, in that I oversaw the development of the original hi-res versions in the Roland Master sample library.Ildon wrote:Oh crap, you did sounds for the Sound Canvases?!Are we talking the SC88, SC55 or higher?
The Sound Canvas stuff is the cut-down, low res versions of a limited selection of those sounds....the original hi-res versions are MUCH, MUCH better sounding than the consumer editions they did for the Sound Canvas series....and there are many more sounds too.
They were originally released as Roland 700 series CD-ROM libraries for pro use.
-
- KVRAF
- 3158 posts since 2 Jul, 2005 from Stuck in the closet
You're right. I have liked your work - a lot. Those Sound Canvases are gorgeous.
Mizutaphile.
-
- KVRian
- 1096 posts since 31 Aug, 2001 from Los Angeles, California
hah....interesting. Never got that compliment before. Glad you like 'em.Ildon wrote:I'm a huge fan of video game music, and the Sound Canvases have the sound for me that I've been trying to find or recreate in other synths and have failed miserably. That blows me away.
You're right. I have liked your work - a lot. Those Sound Canvases are gorgeous.
-
- KVRAF
- 7886 posts since 24 Feb, 2003 from Earth, USA
Hey Eric, I just picked up the D-50 card VC-1 for my VariOS. How much of the D50 was your work? It's so...
Devon
Devon
Simple music philosophy - Those who can, make music. Those who can't, make excuses.
Read my VST reviews at Traxmusic!
Read my VST reviews at Traxmusic!