KVR Audio

BertKoor · Post by **BertKoor** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:35 pm

Next to the notepad I do find "calc.exe" but each to their own tools... Thanks for the table anyway. I'm sure at least one person here finds it very useful

Ambisphere · Post by **Ambisphere** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:36 pm

I hate Excel. The one copy I had, I stomped on it and threw it the garbage can. Besides, it wouldn't save any time entering all that data anyway. In fact it would be slower.

Ambisphere · Post by **Ambisphere** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:39 pm

robojam, you're saying that it is quicker to enter data into a calculator then look at a piece of paper? I think not.

Ambisphere · Post by **Ambisphere** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:41 pm

This argument is getting old...I'm outa here. Take care guys.

robogone · Post by **robogone** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:41 pm

It's quicker to do a quick calculation on the calculator on my desk than it is to fire up a web browser, visit the page and look for the data.

Xnah · Post by **Xnah** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:41 pm

Ambisphere wrote:robojam, you're saying that it is quicker to enter data into a calculator then look at a piece of paper? I think not.

Not just looking... but searching as well...

Actually all you'd need to enter is: number of beats and number of milliseconds (or seconds), once you've programmed the right formula. (60/(seconds/beats)) or something like that?

robogone · Post by **robogone** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:44 pm

Xnah wrote:
Ambisphere wrote:robojam, you're saying that it is quicker to enter data into a calculator then look at a piece of paper? I think not.
Not just looking... but searching as well...

Actually all you'd need to enter is: number of beats and number of milliseconds (or seconds), once you've programmed the right formula. (60/(seconds/beats)) or something like that?

True. It just takes me a couple of seconds and I have the number there in front of me.

Zyxoas · Post by **Zyxoas** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 10:59 pm

Ambisphere wrote:I hate Excel. The one copy I had, I stomped on it and threw it the garbage can. Besides, it wouldn't save any time entering all that data anyway. In fact it would be slower.

You've obviously never used Excel before.

Meffy · Post by **Meffy** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 3:46 pm

Ambisphere, if you want to bring your table to the attention of people again, please DO NOT start another thread. I just finished deleting eight, maybe ten spammed threads concerning this table, all alike.

The correct way to do it is to "bump" your existing thread -- that would be this one -- by posting any little comment that you think of... even just "bump."

Folks, I think I've deleted all the duplicate (mostly empty) threads. If anyone finds another, please post the URL in this thread and I'll clean it up.

(Gee, bones was right. Those mods censor everything.)

BPM Reference Table Online