Do you use Reaktor? If not why?
-
- Banned
- 1842 posts since 4 Aug, 2004 from just right here
Id like to try it, but like all Native Instruments stuff its way too expensive for me and I don't realy have the time for complex synth building. I do have the Reacktor Session out of a mag which I do like, but find I can't use it?
- something special
- 8627 posts since 16 Mar, 2002 from Birmingham, Alabama
That's my favorite way of using Reaktor, too.kuniklo wrote: Thanks. There's a pretty nice workflow with Reaktor + Live 7. Just set up a short loop of a sound you like in Reaktor, either played via notes in a clip or just playing a loop from a sequenced Reaktor ensemble. Then just use Live's freeze & flatten feature to turn it into audio. You can generate a lot of interesting phrases this way.
One of the first vst's I bought, justifying it's expense that if I found x number of ensembles useful I wouldn't have to buy anything else...of course, that logic failed me..but I've never mourned the decision.
davey goes fishin' is 98% Reaktor
Last edited by bluedad on Fri May 23, 2008 11:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Download SOphist Download SOphist https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=95874
- KVRAF
- 4434 posts since 26 Jan, 2006 from :noitacoL
i am too lazy for reaktor. one day, maybe.
member of the guild of professional dilettantes.
- KVRAF
- 8644 posts since 2 Oct, 2006 from Leeds, UK
I am too lazy for...Download SOphist wrote:i am too lazy for reaktor. one day, maybe.
Latest release and Socials: https://linktr.ee/ph.i.ltr3
- KVRAF
- 4196 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
-
- KVRAF
- 2217 posts since 15 Jul, 2003
I use Reaktor occasionally for its drum machines, even rarer occasions for the drone machines, but on a regular basis for its grain machines.
I don't attempt to make my own ensembles.
There are a handful of really great grain machines and I haven't found anything else that comes close to doing what they do. I tend to use about 3 where I've learned the user interface. With Reaktor grain machines it seems to be all about different graphic presentations to show what's under control. It takes a while to catch on sometimes.
Usually I'll provide some small audio piece from what I'm working on as the sample base and then start to tweak and then fit that into the background. And that's pretty much the secret ingredient to all sorts of dark ambient lounge.
I don't attempt to make my own ensembles.
There are a handful of really great grain machines and I haven't found anything else that comes close to doing what they do. I tend to use about 3 where I've learned the user interface. With Reaktor grain machines it seems to be all about different graphic presentations to show what's under control. It takes a while to catch on sometimes.
Usually I'll provide some small audio piece from what I'm working on as the sample base and then start to tweak and then fit that into the background. And that's pretty much the secret ingredient to all sorts of dark ambient lounge.
- KVRAF
- 8644 posts since 2 Oct, 2006 from Leeds, UK
Howard wrote:I am too...musikmachine wrote:I am too lazy for...
Seriously though,i grabbed reaktor 4 in the marketplace as it was cheap and demoed 5 for a while before upgrading it,but i've hardly used it since!
It is a bit cpu hungry for my laptop and i only have a small lcd monitor
As it's big and powerful i think you need a big and powerful machine to run it,maybe even dedcate a machine to it.I just got Guru and i can see the potential for loop mangling and experimental stuff so i'm going to use Reaktor to generate loops,hits,fx and sounds to load up in Guru,at the very least.
Latest release and Socials: https://linktr.ee/ph.i.ltr3
-
- KVRist
- 493 posts since 20 Apr, 2004 from hki-fi
I'd get REAKTOR5 if it wasn't so darn expensive.. who knows, if I manage to find a reasonably prized second hand copy..
For the price they are selling it now, I'd definitely choose Max/MSP over REAKTOR.. Has better documentation (Excellent tutorials!) and extendability (like coding your own externals in C etc)
For the price they are selling it now, I'd definitely choose Max/MSP over REAKTOR.. Has better documentation (Excellent tutorials!) and extendability (like coding your own externals in C etc)
- KVRAF
- 4845 posts since 2 Sep, 2005 from city of lights (nl)
I was fortunate enough to get a copy here at the KVR market for I believe $180 or $190 USD. A great deal for me since I'm in Europe. It's probably my fav plug-in and there's still so much to explore.
Only downside is that many ensembles are quite CPU intensive and my 4 year old PC doesn't cope well with the amount of ensembles I want to use in my tracks.
Only downside is that many ensembles are quite CPU intensive and my 4 year old PC doesn't cope well with the amount of ensembles I want to use in my tracks.
Rekkerd.org the latest news on audio plugins, sample libraries & virtual instruments, synth presets & more.
Don't click here if you can't control yourself!
Don't click here if you can't control yourself!
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 774 posts since 1 Oct, 2006
Found it for $387 and some change (US dollars). I believe that is less then I paid for it...I have a really bad memory so I don't remember how much it was when it was released. Tassman is a few dollars less and max/msp is $495 without jitter. I really understand that if you are only interested in one aspect it might be an expensive purchase. I wanted to make my own instruments so I didn't care how much it cost, that is what I wanted to do. Now I have a constant headache and my eyes burn for looking at the screen so long.
None the less, I have recommended it to people because of the UL, there is so much there, for someone that is starting up I have a hard time seeing it a bad thing, as it would save them a good deal of money and much of the things that Reaktor may not satisfy for them there are so many high quality freeware and low cost plugins that are just perfect to get that extra bit. There is always a bit hesitation however, the less the perfect way that Reaktor works as a plugin will set up a the wrong veiw of how plugin work as Reaktor is still gear for stand alone. The are potential problem with other apects as it is very non-standard and not very conducive to a normal working environment. And there is that temptation to look inside the instruments prematurely and get totally dismayed by it. But that just my 2cents. I said I wasn't going to contribute...
but hey I'm only 90% fanboy.
Thanks for the continued comments.
None the less, I have recommended it to people because of the UL, there is so much there, for someone that is starting up I have a hard time seeing it a bad thing, as it would save them a good deal of money and much of the things that Reaktor may not satisfy for them there are so many high quality freeware and low cost plugins that are just perfect to get that extra bit. There is always a bit hesitation however, the less the perfect way that Reaktor works as a plugin will set up a the wrong veiw of how plugin work as Reaktor is still gear for stand alone. The are potential problem with other apects as it is very non-standard and not very conducive to a normal working environment. And there is that temptation to look inside the instruments prematurely and get totally dismayed by it. But that just my 2cents. I said I wasn't going to contribute...
Thanks for the continued comments.
-
- KVRAF
- 6496 posts since 26 Nov, 2004 from Frederick, MD
Scot Solida wrote:...I've found everything from a spot-on Roland JX-3P emu...
Don't get me wrong, I own a real 3P and love it, but the idea of using Kyma to recreate it sounds a bit "pearls before swine" to me.
It reminds me of watching Dire Straits use a $250,000 Synclavier to do that cheesy organ melody in Walk of Life.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 774 posts since 1 Oct, 2006
When I was working with Reaktor in a host DAW, CPU was always an issue. If I wanted to do more then just Synth and bass sort of stuff I just gave up. I put a good deal of time in to get CPU down in stand alone, I have run four Skrewell instruments, a mixer, and spacemaster2 but that is all my XP with an amd64 could handle. I would have had problems doing that in a host for sure.core wrote:I was fortunate enough to get a copy here at the KVR market for I believe $180 or $190 USD. A great deal for me since I'm in Europe. It's probably my fav plug-in and there's still so much to explore.
Only downside is that many ensembles are quite CPU intensive and my 4 year old PC doesn't cope well with the amount of ensembles I want to use in my tracks.
-
- KVRAF
- 6496 posts since 26 Nov, 2004 from Frederick, MD
That's more than 1/3 the price of Komplete. I'm convinced the only way to buy Reaktor or any of the NI stuff is with Komplete. The last upgrade I did cost less that that price and I ended up getting Guitar Rig II, FM8, upgrades for Reaktor and Kontakt, PLUS Akoustik Piano and Electrik Piano.Hlis93 wrote:Found it for $387 and some change (US dollars). I believe that is less then I paid for it...
It's well, well worth saving up for.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 774 posts since 1 Oct, 2006
I wish Komplete was offered when I purchased Reaktor, or if it was I wish I had realized what it was. Yes, it seems the most reasonalble way to go, but I think I am far to lazy to install everything.emdot_ambient wrote:That's more than 1/3 the price of Komplete. I'm convinced the only way to buy Reaktor or any of the NI stuff is with Komplete. The last upgrade I did cost less that that price and I ended up getting Guitar Rig II, FM8, upgrades for Reaktor and Kontakt, PLUS Akoustik Piano and Electrik Piano.Hlis93 wrote:Found it for $387 and some change (US dollars). I believe that is less then I paid for it...
It's well, well worth saving up for.

