KVR Audio

spaceman · Post by **spaceman** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:59 am

Art Evans wrote:
It's great to have a decent sample editor and per clip effects.
Reaper has per clip FX. Whether decent or not is for you to decide!

Compared to Logic I mean

headquest · Post by **headquest** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:26 pm

I thought Logic's effects were reputed to be good/better than Cubase's ... ?

spaceman · Post by **spaceman** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:37 pm

headquest wrote:I thought Logic's effects were reputed to be good/better than Cubase's ... ?

right.. that wasn't the point

The point is that Logic doesn't do per-clip fxs, so it doesn't matter how good they are. Cubase and Reaper do do per-clip fxs, and Cubase has a decent sample editor, unlike Logic and Reaper (which has none).

So to sum it up.. we need more cowbell

dark_virus · Post by **dark_virus** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:44 pm

dimitar wrote:Fast Tracker 2 is my choice !

Trackers rulez!!!

Other sequencerz SUXX!

In before the lock.

spaceman · Post by **spaceman** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:48 pm

dark_virus wrote:
dimitar wrote:Fast Tracker 2 is my choice !
Trackers rulez!!!

Other sequencerz SUXX!

Renoise is the only decent tracker

Does a wicked cowbell too

Compyfox · Post by **Compyfox** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:53 pm

tattiemannie wrote:The Reaper arrived and told me to uninstall it from my hard drive and put it out of its misery!

Welcome to the family, Reaper-Fanboy.

Seriously, was that really necessary? Does that make you a superior user or something? Without Cubase, Logic and ProTools (and their predecessors on the Atari), nothing like Reaper would have been possible (concept and workflow wise).

And why do I even write in a thread like that? I just thought "sh*t, Steinberg just revealed a new host and ditches their rewrite of Cubase yet again" - geez.

IBTL!

spaceman · Post by **spaceman** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:05 pm

Cubase is dead! Long live the Cubase!

dark_virus · Post by **dark_virus** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:06 pm

spaceman wrote:
dark_virus wrote:
dimitar wrote:Fast Tracker 2 is my choice !
Trackers rulez!!!

Other sequencerz SUXX!
Renoise is the only decent tracker
Does a wicked cowbell too

Can't compare with Psycle's cowbell. Sorry.

spaceman · Post by **spaceman** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:11 pm

dark_virus wrote:
spaceman wrote: Renoise is the only decent tracker
Does a wicked cowbell too
Can't compare with Psycle's cowbell. Sorry.

I don't believe you.. Renoise's cowbell goes like this:

"TPOOOWNG"

headquest · Post by **headquest** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:15 pm

spaceman wrote: right.. that wasn't the point The point is that Logic doesn't do per-clip fxs, so it doesn't matter how good they are. Cubase and Reaper do do per-clip fxs, and Cubase has a decent sample editor, unlike Logic and Reaper (which has none).

So to sum it up.. we need more cowbell

Gotcha. In that case, rumours of Cubase's death are apparently premature

DHR53 · Post by **DHR53** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:15 pm

So Spaceman... you didn't even get the DP6 up and running? Hmmmm... I've been wondering about Cubase 4.1 for a long time. I owned 2.0 SX and used it for awhile... Had no problems with it except at the time, the midi controller setup for the Mac didn't work... but that was a long time ago. Still, nobody wants to admit they switched from Logic to Cubase (on the Mac side) these days. Wonder why?

Meekual · Post by **Meekual** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:17 pm

Compyfox wrote:
tattiemannie wrote:The Reaper arrived and told me to uninstall it from my hard drive and put it out of its misery!
Welcome to the family, Reaper-Fanboy.

Seriously, was that really necessary? Does that make you a superior user or something? Without Cubase, Logic and ProTools (and their predecessors on the Atari), nothing like Reaper would have been possible (concept and workflow wise).

And why do I even write in a thread like that? I just thought "sh*t, Steinberg just revealed a new host and ditches their rewrite of Cubase yet again" - geez.

IBTL!

ummm, was the reaction really nessecary? Would it be a problem if someone came on here and said "cubase is dead!!! I uninstalled it, and now im using tracktion!!! woohooo!!!"

for many, a change of hosts to something that is more useful and intuitive for them is quite a positive experience to be shared

headquest · Post by **headquest** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:20 pm

Compyfox wrote:Seriously, was that really necessary?

Well, it was generous of him to at least give us all a warning. Because now that he has ditched Cubase and switched to Reaper, Cubase is to all intents and purposes dead.

The OP is the only real person in fact - the rest of us are just figments of his imagination. He might continue to imagine other poor sods still using the dead Cubase software for a short time, but before too long he will forget it/them altogether; Cubase and its users will then cease to exist at all.

Meekual · Post by **Meekual** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:21 pm

i think everyone is taking this way to seriously

headquest · Post by **headquest** » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:21 pm

Meekual wrote: Would it be a problem if someone came on here and said "cubase is dead!!! I uninstalled it, and now im using tracktion!!! woohooo!!!"

Our jaws would drop... then we would all laugh very loud!

for many, a change of hosts to something that is more useful and intuitive for them is quite a positive experience to be shared

True enough.

Cubase is Dead