No it is not bizzare, but not a rock steady interpretation either. As you can see from my quotes, he also states that Moog modular V has it's own character and is crazy as if he really likes it.olicana wrote:without going fishing for other quotes ....
this one to me says: he prefers the sound of analogs although he appreciates the flexibility of VAs. and i don't thinks its a bizarre interpreation.
Anyway, this way of stating it, is also a much more modest statement than what you have said so far. In these quotes below, you sound like you can read his mind:
olicana wrote: notice how he doesn't have any VA hardware either....as VAs being software suffer from the same problems soundwise as softsynths.
although i'm sure with new generation of softsynths the gap will be closed with the analogs .
Here your own agenda about software synths are quite appearant regarding the interpretation of his statments.olicana wrote: exactly he will use analog synths cos in his opinion THEY SOUND BETTER than VAs despite the limitations of analogs .His choice is based on sound.thats what i meant in my post.
he sticks to analog synths not cos he is reluctant to learn new software as someone said(he even got deep into reaktor which i bet would be unknown territory for many here)...he simply chooses analog synths based on sound preference.
Do not be paranoid now. I asked you to open your mind, that can hardly be called flaming you, can it?olicana wrote: anyway i knew this thread would turn into a flame war.
stayin out of this one....and only returning if it gets really nasty
