iphone OR Android...I'm selling out...hee (I must have texting)
-
- KVRAF
- 1629 posts since 11 Dec, 2005 from Malmö, Sweden
Sigh. This thread is so full of wrongs. Even though a former iPhone user and now an Android user I'd say get an iPhone if you think you'll like to tinker with music apps. Get an Android later on if you feel too limited or want a choice of different hardware configurations, or a better personalization experience for that matter. A few things to note though, fragmentation is not that big of an issue since you are buying a new phone. The new and most important old apps will definetely work. Be sure that it will get an upgrade to Android OS 4 (Ice Cream Sandwich) like the Samsung Galaxy S2 for example. In my opinion Ice Cream Sandwich is way more exciting than the latest iOS which are still looking approximately like it did 2 years ago. If you like to theme yor phone, go Android. If you like to 'swipe' your words instead of typing, go Android. If you like the idea of widgets on the homescreen, go Android, if you are using Gmail and other Google services definetely go Android. If you like a bigger screen, go Android.
But still, as a newcomer to the field of smartphones I think you will love an iPhone to bits. Even though I personally feel limited and get confused by it's low threshold of easy to use-ness / dumbing down-ness. I simply can't be as productive with it's interface. Each to his/hers own I have to say. Good hunting!
But still, as a newcomer to the field of smartphones I think you will love an iPhone to bits. Even though I personally feel limited and get confused by it's low threshold of easy to use-ness / dumbing down-ness. I simply can't be as productive with it's interface. Each to his/hers own I have to say. Good hunting!
-
- KVRAF
- 1629 posts since 11 Dec, 2005 from Malmö, Sweden
Cheers to you too Mr Smileyface.CT wrote:Well, I dont remember saying anything about a "9000" S. Maybe you need to re-learn how to read properly.
My model number is 5670, and I did say it was cheapo. It was actually half the price of my iphone 4. I said the iphone is around the same price as "equivalent" android phones. Maybe "equivalent" is too big a word for you. Maybe you didnt get it. And maybe you didnt get this the first time, so I'll say it again, you need to learn how to read.
Like seriously, dont go around calling ppl liars, especially if you're retarded or deficient in any way.
Oh, and mute button just got pressed, I have no time for idiots.
- KVRAF
- 8700 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
I'm an iPhone user, but that was funnyjensa wrote: But still, as a newcomer to the field of smartphones I think you will love an iPhone to bits. Even though I personally feel limited and get confused by it's low threshold of easy to use-ness / dumbing down-ness. I simply can't be as productive with it's interface. Each to his/hers own I have to say. Good hunting!
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
-
- KVRAF
- 1629 posts since 11 Dec, 2005 from Malmö, Sweden
Well, first. English isn't my primary language (I think that was evident in my first post to CT, he he) so maybe I missed something.spaceman wrote:I'm an iPhone user, but that was funnyjensa wrote: But still, as a newcomer to the field of smartphones I think you will love an iPhone to bits. Even though I personally feel limited and get confused by it's low threshold of easy to use-ness / dumbing down-ness. I simply can't be as productive with it's interface. Each to his/hers own I have to say. Good hunting!
-
- KVRist
- 103 posts since 6 Feb, 2012
Haha. I think it's mostly a matter of taste. (Then again, good quality true multitouch touchscreen and superior software is not.)jensa wrote:I tend to first learn and then de-learn the old when I get something new. I feel very stupid when trying to get around an iPhone nowadays. Either it says something about me, or possibly it says something about both are easy/hard enough to learn... or a combination between these two.
I find the Android interface confusing and far too busy. (Or "exciting" as you put it.) If I went with UX design preferences, I'd be using a Windows 7 phone, but those have other shortcomings - like not too many music apps and Internet Explorer.
I tend to think of the phone as a tool, and not as something to tinker with. Being simplistic ("dumbed down") is a definite plus for a tool in my eyes, even though I am a long-time Linux geek.
-
- KVRAF
- 1629 posts since 11 Dec, 2005 from Malmö, Sweden
Can't say I feel the different between my two Androids and the multitude of iPhones I've tried. If you mean hardware-wise. Software-wise the iPhone is snappier but the gap is smaller with the newest phones and ICS.D.Josef wrote:Haha. I think it's mostly a matter of taste. (Then again, good quality true multitouch touchscreen and superior software is not.)
Ha ha. I meant "exciting" with a slightly more positive vibe than "busy". I meant more advanced, more refined for getting you closer to what you want to do. But then again, it's me and I'm colored by ICS. Quite a lot.I find the Android interface confusing and far too busy. (Or "exciting" as you put it.)
Though, one interesting thing is that for each new iteration the iPhone interface gets more busy and the iPhone people seems to adapt to that perfectly fine so even I tend to think iPhone users are to some degree willing to adapt and have a curiousness for the new and not just the tried and tested.
Haven't tried it yet. Wish I had.If I went with UX design preferences, I'd be using a Windows 7 phone, but those have other shortcomings - like not too many music apps and Internet Explorer.
Typically me. Using the word "tinker" in the wrong place. Sorry about that. Well, I tinker, I do, but (here we go again) what I meant was the possibility to personalize and change the UI, datasharing between applications and for example the choice of what app should opened from within other apps is a little more possible than in iOS. Well, I'll stop now or I will confuse myself too.I tend to think of the phone as a tool, and not as something to tinker with. Being simplistic ("dumbed down") is a definite plus for a tool in my eyes, even though I am a long-time Linux geek.
Buy an iPhone. You'll get a lot less foes.
- KVRAF
- 8700 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
In my opinion, any music app on a small screen like that with only touch to control is a bloody pain in the arse.
It's ok to keep you busy when you've got a bit of time to kill, but who in his right mind would want to make music on a iPhone or Android phone is you have a laptop/i(whatever)pad or desktop computer? I tried so many of them and the predominant emotion while using them is frustration. The endless tapping and scrolling and swiping just to get the most basic things done kills creativity faster than a bullet through your head.
It's ok to keep you busy when you've got a bit of time to kill, but who in his right mind would want to make music on a iPhone or Android phone is you have a laptop/i(whatever)pad or desktop computer? I tried so many of them and the predominant emotion while using them is frustration. The endless tapping and scrolling and swiping just to get the most basic things done kills creativity faster than a bullet through your head.
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
- KVRAF
- 2147 posts since 30 Oct, 2006 from Australia, NSW
iPhone 4s
http://www.voltagedisciple.com
Patches for PHASEPLANT ACE,PREDATOR, SYNPLANT, SUB BOOM BASS2,PUNCH , PUNCH BD
AALTO,CIRCLE,BLADE and V-Haus Card For Tiptop Audio ONE Module
https://soundcloud.com/somerville-1i
Patches for PHASEPLANT ACE,PREDATOR, SYNPLANT, SUB BOOM BASS2,PUNCH , PUNCH BD
AALTO,CIRCLE,BLADE and V-Haus Card For Tiptop Audio ONE Module
https://soundcloud.com/somerville-1i
-
- KVRian
- 710 posts since 17 Jan, 2005 from Amsterdam
Just like spacman wrote if you are serious about music then no smartphone will do you any good.
In my opinion go get a Windows Phone 7, like e.g the Nokia Lumia 900 (which will be available in march) or any other WP7 with at least a 4.3" display. WP7 is probably the best when it comes to email, texting and social media. I've tried them all and to me WP7 is the clear winner in that regard. The browser is also fine. It just doesn't support Flash like the iPhone. Although that's more of a relief than an issue
To cover your interest in music apps I'd just wait for Windows 8, which is due any time soon (at least the Consumer Preview). Windows 8 on a tablet will have a huge advantage over any other mobile OS, because it covers both worlds: Apps AND the standard Windows software.
When you have both, a WP7 (or WP8 due out in fall) AND a Windows 8 tablet you're fully covered and shouldn't worry about syncing data, because you're basically on the same platform.
In my opinion go get a Windows Phone 7, like e.g the Nokia Lumia 900 (which will be available in march) or any other WP7 with at least a 4.3" display. WP7 is probably the best when it comes to email, texting and social media. I've tried them all and to me WP7 is the clear winner in that regard. The browser is also fine. It just doesn't support Flash like the iPhone. Although that's more of a relief than an issue
To cover your interest in music apps I'd just wait for Windows 8, which is due any time soon (at least the Consumer Preview). Windows 8 on a tablet will have a huge advantage over any other mobile OS, because it covers both worlds: Apps AND the standard Windows software.
When you have both, a WP7 (or WP8 due out in fall) AND a Windows 8 tablet you're fully covered and shouldn't worry about syncing data, because you're basically on the same platform.
-
- KVRAF
- 1629 posts since 11 Dec, 2005 from Malmö, Sweden
I fixed that for ya. And I like Flash on my phone, as long as it's still used on the web and gives me a more solid and complete browsing experience.bM3w wrote:It just doesn't support Flash like the Android. Although that's more of a relief than an issue
I'm using the new Chrome Beta for Android and it's really nice and fast with some cool functionality like having direct access to all the opened tabs in my Chrome on the desktop. No, I'm not talking about synced bookmarks, these are synced opened tabs. Grab'n'go has a new meaning.I've tried them all and to me WP7 is the clear winner in that regard. The browser is also fine.
- KVRAF
- 8700 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
I think he meant it doesn't support Flash, just like the iPhone doesn'tjensa wrote:I fixed that for ya.bM3w wrote:It just doesn't support Flash like the Android. Although that's more of a relief than an issue
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
-
- KVRAF
- 1629 posts since 11 Dec, 2005 from Malmö, Sweden
spaceman wrote:I think he meant it doesn't support Flash, just like the iPhone doesn'tjensa wrote:I fixed that for ya.bM3w wrote:It just doesn't support Flash like the Android. Although that's more of a relief than an issue
I'm out.
-
- KVRist
- 103 posts since 6 Feb, 2012
Haha I'm starting to sound like a total Apple cultist. Nevertheless, I do think it's the best choice.

And being serious about music doesn't preclude clowning around with music sometimes.
(HAha.) And the thread isn't about tablets really.

The smartphone was never meant to replace the piano or hardware synth.bM3w wrote:Just like spacman wrote if you are serious about music then no smartphone will do you any good.
And being serious about music doesn't preclude clowning around with music sometimes.
I'm skeptical about Windows 8. It's an even numbered windows release, which doesn't bode well.bM3w wrote:To cover your interest in music apps I'd just wait for Windows 8, which is due any time soon (at least the Consumer Preview). Windows 8 on a tablet will have a huge advantage over any other mobile OS, because it covers both worlds: Apps AND the standard Windows software.
Well I tend to install a flash blocker on my desktop computers as well, and the only time I turn it off is to play Flash games.jensa wrote:I fixed that for ya. And I like Flash on my phone, as long as it's still used on the web and gives me a more solid and complete browsing experience.But I'm with you, they should stop using it on the web.
- KVRAF
- 8700 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
Clowning around is indeed all you'll be doing on a smartphone.D.Josef wrote:The smartphone was never meant to replace the piano or hardware synth.bM3w wrote:Just like spacman wrote if you are serious about music then no smartphone will do you any good.
And being serious about music doesn't preclude clowning around with music sometimes.
I'm not saying it can't be fun, but it is mostly clowning.
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
-
penguinfromdeep penguinfromdeep https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=193898
- KVRAF
- 1993 posts since 18 Nov, 2008
I wonder how those windows phones like Lumia will be .. Anybody know? I wonder especially how if the interface will be smooth like on Iphones. No laggyness etc ..
circuit modeling and 0-dfb filters are cool