Why not ?izonin wrote:With polyphony in mind, even if Access released a Virus plug-in, you wouldn't be able to run it even on a fast machine.
Is it something to bet on a Virus synth?
- KVRAF
- 9590 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
-
Bronto Scorpio Bronto Scorpio https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=98170
- KVRAF
- 5546 posts since 13 Feb, 2006 from Wiesmoor, Germany
Again, I'm not saying the Virus sounds better than VSTs but it sounds unique.
Check the Grain- and Formant Oscillators video: http://virus.info/page/render/lang/en/p ... urces.html
Please do that with, Dune, Sylenth, Zebra....
The only VSTs which have similar features are Massive and Zebra but they sound completely different.
Most people still seem to think the Virus can only do trancey "Hyperswas", that's really not true! I completely agree that these trancey sounds can easily be replaced with VSTs.
Cheers
Dennis
Check the Grain- and Formant Oscillators video: http://virus.info/page/render/lang/en/p ... urces.html
Please do that with, Dune, Sylenth, Zebra....
The only VSTs which have similar features are Massive and Zebra but they sound completely different.
Most people still seem to think the Virus can only do trancey "Hyperswas", that's really not true! I completely agree that these trancey sounds can easily be replaced with VSTs.
Cheers
Dennis
- KVRAF
- 14136 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Lost and Spaced
Oh goody, a Virus Easter thread....

Deja Vu, Jamais Vu
Let's call the whole thing off...

Deja Vu, Jamais Vu
Let's call the whole thing off...
-
- KVRist
- 235 posts since 22 Apr, 2011
Similar story here. Had a TI2 but sold it. Felt much lighter after selling it, and richer tootehlord wrote:hakey wrote:
The innovation is in native software these days - Access are just playing cash up.![]()
The way I see it (and I have owned a Virus Ti) is that Access need to make the Virus VST truly work the same way that any other VST does. Being able to open only one instance with only 3 outputs severely restricts it's usability imo, and it was the main reason I sold the Ti. Take that feature away and you're left with a great sounding, but fairly standard instrument.
It also needs a huge increase in DSP power to justify the cost, otherwise standard VST plugins are just so much more convenient, and equally as powerful. The Virus does have a unique flavour but i'd never buy a new one. It's just too much money.
Bought a bunch of soft synths thereafter, including alchemy, zebra, dune, twin 2, synth squad. And still had enough money left for a pair of decent monitor speakers. One major plus point about all the hype surrounding viruses (or virii
Couldn't be happier.
- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
Sorry Dennis, I have to respectfully disagree with you there.Bronto Scorpio wrote:Again, I'm not saying the Virus sounds better than VSTs but it sounds unique.
Check the Grain- and Formant Oscillators video: http://virus.info/page/render/lang/en/p ... urces.html
Please do that with, Dune, Sylenth, Zebra....
The only VSTs which have similar features are Massive and Zebra but they sound completely different.
In the grand scheme of things the differences in sound between VA synths are really not *so* great. If they were that obvious, the various guess the synth threads here would not end up as the more-or-less random lists that they all do.
And I watched the Virus vowel filter vid and don't hear anything startlingly unique there - at least I'm not sure that, without reference to known examples, I'd be able to recognise it next to Zebra doing something similar.
(Btw, in that recent Diva/guess-the-synth thread I managed to convince someone that Diva has a "very good vowel filter" - so getting one synth with a vowel filter [and loads of other tricks] to sound close enough to another synth with a vowel filter isn't likely to be so difficult.)
...couldn't find the "grain" vid on the Access site, but I'm willing to bet you could find a plugin that would get you in similar sonic territory.
-
- KVRist
- 84 posts since 26 Oct, 2009
That's why the hype is so maddening really, the synth is versatile and worth a lot of respect, but the unshakable "does it sound like a virus?" meme is geared mostly towards a particular sound that dozens of other synths can do. Good synth with way too much obnoxious mysticism surrounding it.Bronto Scorpio wrote:Most people still seem to think the Virus can only do trancey "Hyperswas", that's really not true! I completely agree that these trancey sounds can easily be replaced with VSTs.
- KVRAF
- 14136 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Lost and Spaced
Was that Diva? Cause you know that was me...I thought it was that piano pluggy......
I still stand by what I said. It sounded like a very good vowel filter.
I still stand by what I said. It sounded like a very good vowel filter.
- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
I do now (had to go and check) - yes it was Diva.osiris wrote:Was that Diva? Cause you know that was me
Not sure which bit you were referring to - the choir or the talk box bass - but thanks anyway.I still stand by what I said. It sounded like a very good vowel filter.
And that wasn't a dig at your expense. It was more an illustration of how supposedly very unique, identifiable sounding synths are anything but when tested blind. I've never guessed one right yet.
-
Bronto Scorpio Bronto Scorpio https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=98170
- KVRAF
- 5546 posts since 13 Feb, 2006 from Wiesmoor, Germany
No problem! That's why we are here, to discuss things. And to feed our GAShakey wrote:Sorry Dennis, I have to respectfully disagree with you there.Bronto Scorpio wrote:Again, I'm not saying the Virus sounds better than VSTs but it sounds unique.
Check the Grain- and Formant Oscillators video: http://virus.info/page/render/lang/en/p ... urces.html
Please do that with, Dune, Sylenth, Zebra....
The only VSTs which have similar features are Massive and Zebra but they sound completely different.
I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a Boesendorfer and a Steinway without reference, can we burn all Steinways now?hakey wrote:
In the grand scheme of things the differences in sound between VA synths are really not *so* great. If they were that obvious, the various guess the synth threads here would not end up as the more-or-less random lists that they all do.
And I watched the Virus vowel filter vid and don't hear anything startlingly unique there - at least I'm not sure that, without reference to known examples, I'd be able to recognise it next to Zebra doing something similar.
(Btw, in that recent Diva/guess-the-synth thread I managed to convince someone that Diva has a "very good vowel filter" - so getting one synth with a vowel filter [and loads of other tricks] to sound close enough to another synth with a vowel filter isn't likely to be so difficult.)
...couldn't find the "grain" vid on the Access site, but I'm willing to bet you could find a plugin that would get you in similar sonic territory.
If you go down that route you probably only need Synth1 (there is even some truth to that).
The Virus is different than Zebra just like Diva is different than Zebra.
All 3 have their uses
Cheers
Dennis
-
Bronto Scorpio Bronto Scorpio https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=98170
- KVRAF
- 5546 posts since 13 Feb, 2006 from Wiesmoor, Germany
This!liquid wind wrote:That's why the hype is so maddening really, the synth is versatile and worth a lot of respect, but the unshakable "does it sound like a virus?" meme is geared mostly towards a particular sound that dozens of other synths can do. Good synth with way too much obnoxious mysticism surrounding it.Bronto Scorpio wrote:Most people still seem to think the Virus can only do trancey "Hyperswas", that's really not true! I completely agree that these trancey sounds can easily be replaced with VSTs.
- KVRAF
- 5913 posts since 17 Aug, 2004 from Berlin, Germany
I think this is not true. Access is not the only company able to design filter algorithms. There are a lot developers with the same or better knowledge.izonin wrote:But if we talk purely about sound, the Virus is still way ahead of it's VSTi clones. Soundtoys' Filterfreak is the only filter that matches the quality of TI's ones. With polyphony in mind, even if Access released a Virus plug-in, you wouldn't be able to run it even on a fast machine.
U-he, Fabfilter, FXPansion, Tone2 are only some companies with excellent filters.
TI has 2 Motorola DSP I guess, this is not the same processing power like a actual Intel CPU. I expect that a Virus plug-in would not use more CPU than NI Massive or U-He Diva with highest oversampling rate.
It's not the processing power it's more the realtime behavior and how processing power will be shared between different processes (and interrupted).
With a Virus you will not have the problem that other processes will interrupt operations. You have no boot time, no problems with latency or bad developed plugins crashing the host.
But also Access is not free of problems. Their operating systems for the Virus had a lot of bugs with every release. I remember it needs some releases to have a proper timing with OS6.5 for the Virus C and the Virus TI was full of problems and bugs when released. Access is not better than others, they are not developing better or more stable software than others or have more knowledge than others.
| Links- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
Haha - yes, that's a closer analogy than violin/piano.Bronto Scorpio wrote:I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a Boesendorfer and a Steinway without reference, can we burn all Steinways now?
Burning all Steinways might be taking it a bit far - but I certainly wouldn't recommend someone buy one if there were much cheaper and equally-good/better pianos available.
-
- KVRian
- 1355 posts since 27 Oct, 2009
Because quality filters use a lot of CPU cycles. Try running 32 instances of Filterfreak, and you'll see.jupiter8 wrote:Why not ?izonin wrote:With polyphony in mind, even if Access released a Virus plug-in, you wouldn't be able to run it even on a fast machine.
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
I'm pretty sure you can reproduce most of the more versatile sounds you're talking about on other synths/soft synths too.liquid wind wrote:That's why the hype is so maddening really, the synth is versatile and worth a lot of respect, but the unshakable "does it sound like a virus?" meme is geared mostly towards a particular sound that dozens of other synths can do. Good synth with way too much obnoxious mysticism surrounding it.Bronto Scorpio wrote:Most people still seem to think the Virus can only do trancey "Hyperswas", that's really not true! I completely agree that these trancey sounds can easily be replaced with VSTs.
Not sure why there's so many threads like "which soft synth to replace synth x" either though, every synth, be it hardware or software, sounds slightly or completely different. The pure fact that there's no "which hardware synth to replace my plugin" should show that there's pretty much of a irrational hype about hardware synths.
-
- KVRist
- 54 posts since 14 Feb, 2011
As info:4damind wrote:.
TI has 2 Motorola DSP I guess, this is not the same processing power like a actual Intel CPU. I expect that a Virus plug-in would not use more CPU than NI Massive or U-He Diva with highest oversampling rate.
It's not the processing power it's more the realtime behavior and how processing power will be shared between different processes (and interrupted).
One instance of the Virus Powercore Vst-Plugin (compares to Virus B, up to 16Voices + effects ) also even runs on only one single Motorola-DSP of a TC Powercore Element.
It's old Dsps have 100Mhz each.
Last edited by tectonica on Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:34 pm, edited 3 times in total.
