I gotta look into this because I'm not totally getting it from what you're showing there. Tomorrow I'll reinstall Reason and try it. Thanks.xbitz wrote:should simply add manual overwrite (shift+space) to the stop transport button > option/keyboard control edit mode, double click on the stop button / shift+space
Propellerhead Software has been bought
- KVRAF
- 2393 posts since 29 Jun, 2005 from La La Land
- KVRAF
- 2393 posts since 29 Jun, 2005 from La La Land
I just looked it up in the manual. It seems as if though even though you can assign a different key command, you still have to manually tell the the cursor to go back to the start point by hitting the shortcut each time. It won't do it automatically. I want to be able to hit the spacebar to stop the transport, then hit play, and the cursor returns to the beginning of the bar automatically, and starts playback from that point without having to manually hit any other keys to tell it to do so. Thanks for trying to help though. I really appreciate it.
- KVRAF
- 4141 posts since 11 Aug, 2006 from Texas
Reason lost its charm for me in the 6.5 -> 7.0 time-frame. At 6.5 and older everyone had the same devices and a big part of the community was creating interesting devices through combinators. The PHeads regularly added new devices to the rack and carefully thought about the interactions between them.
The switch to RE changed all that. The annual upgrades to the DAW contained next to no devices, nominal upgrades to workflow, and things I didn't care at all about like a flattened GUI. The devices that would normally be bundled with a major release are now separate purchases in the prop shop.
Now users don't bother making new devices, they just go buy a new almost-but-not-quite-VST in the store and even the PHead devices no longer feel as deeply integrated into the host. I can't resell them and I really dislike the time-based demoing. No two users has the same set of devices which fragments the community that used to exist around the product. Once this changed I had to view it as just another DAW in the market. When I compare it as a DAW I find it lacking on many fronts. I'd rather use tools like Bitwig and Reaper and download my instruments/FX from the entire internet instead of a curated store-front. I've also filled the "love of wiring devices" that I got from combinators with MUX.
The switch to RE changed all that. The annual upgrades to the DAW contained next to no devices, nominal upgrades to workflow, and things I didn't care at all about like a flattened GUI. The devices that would normally be bundled with a major release are now separate purchases in the prop shop.
Now users don't bother making new devices, they just go buy a new almost-but-not-quite-VST in the store and even the PHead devices no longer feel as deeply integrated into the host. I can't resell them and I really dislike the time-based demoing. No two users has the same set of devices which fragments the community that used to exist around the product. Once this changed I had to view it as just another DAW in the market. When I compare it as a DAW I find it lacking on many fronts. I'd rather use tools like Bitwig and Reaper and download my instruments/FX from the entire internet instead of a curated store-front. I've also filled the "love of wiring devices" that I got from combinators with MUX.
Feel free to call me Brian.
-
- KVRian
- 888 posts since 31 May, 2008 from Australia
So it's like SONAR thenneverenoughfunk wrote:i have to agree... everything in Reason is a workaround...EvilDragon wrote:Even the workflow is not all that, IMHO...
Say 'NO' to Clap
-
- KVRAF
- 2312 posts since 9 Jun, 2002 from East of Santa Monica
It is for me, in that I don't have a problem with either. Both are rock solid and run like a breeze on my system.jinotsuh wrote:So it's like SONAR thenneverenoughfunk wrote:i have to agree... everything in Reason is a workaround...EvilDragon wrote:Even the workflow is not all that, IMHO...
But I'm still on Reason 8, and don't have any use for the rack extensions. I just like messing about with the patching capabilities.
-
- KVRian
- 893 posts since 27 Oct, 2004 from Inside the kick drum
Very same to me. I've sent them message about this and they just said it is forwared to team.. And then I sent it later again, ask'd any news about it, no answer. This thing is so annoying that it keeps me away from buying it. And of course, lack of PDC. Or long midi notes doesn't play middle of them.. So annoying to play pads always from the beggining. Jesus. Very basic things and developers ignoring them = not worth of spend your money on this company.Orbit-50 wrote:I just looked it up in the manual. It seems as if though even though you can assign a different key command, you still have to manually tell the the cursor to go back to the start point by hitting the shortcut each time. It won't do it automatically. I want to be able to hit the spacebar to stop the transport, then hit play, and the cursor returns to the beginning of the bar automatically, and starts playback from that point without having to manually hit any other keys to tell it to do so. Thanks for trying to help though. I really appreciate it.
-
- KVRAF
- 5055 posts since 27 Jul, 2004
PDC or at least APDC is impossible to realize in a modular enviroment like Reason... this is the price you have to pay for flexibility...keel wrote:... And of course, lack of PDC....
- KVRAF
- 9091 posts since 28 May, 2005 from Netherneverlands
for me too. That's exactly why I stopped upgrading from that point.bmrzycki wrote:Reason lost its charm for me in the 6.5 -> 7.0 time-frame.
No band limits, aliasing is the noise of freedom!
- KVRAF
- 37374 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Good points, it did seem this might happen back when they brought out REs. For me I just use it to get access to instruments like the RMI Harmonic Synth and Parsec.bmrzycki wrote:Reason lost its charm for me in the 6.5 -> 7.0 time-frame. At 6.5 and older everyone had the same devices and a big part of the community was creating interesting devices through combinators. The PHeads regularly added new devices to the rack and carefully thought about the interactions between them.
The switch to RE changed all that. The annual upgrades to the DAW contained next to no devices, nominal upgrades to workflow, and things I didn't care at all about like a flattened GUI. The devices that would normally be bundled with a major release are now separate purchases in the prop shop.
Now users don't bother making new devices, they just go buy a new almost-but-not-quite-VST in the store and even the PHead devices no longer feel as deeply integrated into the host. I can't resell them and I really dislike the time-based demoing. No two users has the same set of devices which fragments the community that used to exist around the product. Once this changed I had to view it as just another DAW in the market. When I compare it as a DAW I find it lacking on many fronts. I'd rather use tools like Bitwig and Reaper and download my instruments/FX from the entire internet instead of a curated store-front. I've also filled the "love of wiring devices" that I got from combinators with MUX.
-
- KVRian
- 893 posts since 27 Oct, 2004 from Inside the kick drum
Trancit wrote:PDC or at least APDC is impossible to realize in a modular enviroment like Reason... this is the price you have to pay for flexibility...keel wrote:... And of course, lack of PDC....
Why? Gol said same on FL and Ableton guys ignored it for years too. Yet people complained more and more and they finally add it. Sure it is possible. It is needed now, especially with all those RE's.
-
- KVRAF
- 5055 posts since 27 Jul, 2004
It is not...keel wrote:... Sure it is possible...
FLS is about 10% (or perhaps much less) as modular as Reason and even there are many issues, if APDC is working or not...
One thing is for sure: APDC in Reason will never happen, it can never happen.
If you don´t believe me, we¨ll see and talk again in 10 years
-
- KVRAF
- 1991 posts since 12 Mar, 2004
Perhaps explain why it isn't possible, instead of just saying impossible, point being, it is very surprising how many things developers say are impossible until miraculously they find it possible.
Duh
-
- Banned
- 453 posts since 30 Mar, 2016
If the app can compute all instruments, fx, the UI, MIDI and audio flow, CV, automation and what not, it should be able to compute PDC as well. The app is a closed system, i.e. any delay introduced at any point is visible, it is known. I'd say automatic PDC is exactly the point of a modular environment, otherwise it becomes unworkable, even as a concept. PDC should have been implemented before the first delay-introducing device was released.
But it's not. Like so many basic features. Why? Because you have to 1. wait for it; and 2. you have to pay for it. And this is exactly the reason why I'm not using.... erm, this quite inappropriately named program.
Oh, and it sounds bad.
But it's not. Like so many basic features. Why? Because you have to 1. wait for it; and 2. you have to pay for it. And this is exactly the reason why I'm not using.... erm, this quite inappropriately named program.
Oh, and it sounds bad.
- KVRAF
- 24402 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Any feedback in the structure and PDC cannot work.
-
- KVRAF
- 1991 posts since 12 Mar, 2004
Why ?
If it is read ahead then it can compensate for that too, feedback would be an issue if it was real time but nothing in audio on computers is realtime, feedback would be a big issue for resource use at low latency, but that is not 'impossible'
It is unwise with feedback, not impossible.
If it is read ahead then it can compensate for that too, feedback would be an issue if it was real time but nothing in audio on computers is realtime, feedback would be a big issue for resource use at low latency, but that is not 'impossible'
It is unwise with feedback, not impossible.
Duh