Of course they don't, you're 100% entitled to believe that a mac alpha announced at the same time they're trying to drive sales for lifetime subscriptions is a good business practice, but that doesn't make it so. Seriously, if you think vaporware is a good practice for any company to have, we simply do not think alike.cryophonik wrote:Cakewalk explicitly announced an alpha version of Sonar for Mac and they produced it (albeit a few months late, no surprise). They've made their decision and provided a clear explanation of their reasons for not pursuing it any further in the email and on their forum. They really don't owe us anything else AFAIC.machinesworking wrote:I love how everyone is accepting the explanation that it's too hard etc.
MOTU did it with Digital Performer. You announce a product, you produce it.
In many ways I think the laws against vaporware put in place for publicly traded companies is something that should be adopted for all companies. Whether or not Cakewalk announced it only as an alpha only or not it's going to generate positive interest in the company, which in fact turns out to be misguided.
Cakewalk, Apple, NI etc. there are plenty of companies out there that put out good products, who do not always do the most ethical things. They might be legal, but that doesn't make it right. I'm not saying that because I hate those companies, I own products by all three, but all three have done things that are in their own interest, not the end users.
