There isn't much on their site about the difference, but I would imagine that the "looped" sounds are less expensive because they're not full-length samples of each note. I would bet the sustain is looped, and you may or may not hear it. Here's all their website says: "The Full Edition contains unlooped samples for further realism". My concern is that the "looped" edition has more stops than the "full" edition (62 vs. 10), has more reverbs (7, vs I guess, none or 1--all it says is "stereo"), and takes 7 DVDs, compared to 4 for the "full" edition.goldenhelix wrote:No no, that's not really what I'm looking for. I want something much more flexible than that. I'm just saying that particular free one does that one sound fairly well.![]()
Also, whoever it was that recommended Notre Dam de Budapest... can you give me a better explanation than the web site what the difference is between "Looped" and "Full"? In the feature comparisons, there appears to be no difference, but one costs about twice as much.
I don't know if you saw this, but those instruments are made for Kontakt 2. They should open and play properly in Kontakt 5, but it's difficult to say if they will, and they will almost certainly have to be converted to the new file format, since these are .NKI files. All I saw about Kontakt issues with that sample library was this link https://www.native-instruments.com/foru ... sing.37381. In it, Kontakt users discussed the library and some minor issues they had with it over a decade ago. Your mileage may vary, of course.
And as far as the "typo" war that's raging here, when I've done beta-testing for synths and soundsets/libraries, I've pointed out to the developers any typos I saw. In most cases, the developers simply didn't care to fix them. I see typos in NI (and other) libraries all the time, and I wouldn't expect that to get better any time soon. It's a shame, because to me (and many others), if you can't be bothered to spell a word correctly (especially when you have Google at your fingertips), how careful were you in the coding of the instrument?
There are typos and errors all over Inspired Acoustic's website, and that goes to the concern about errors in the coding. If you even try to compare the "looped" and "full" editions of this sample library, you'll see that the "full" version seems much less "full" than the "looped" one, if you're to believe one of the comparison charts, yet another shows them to have all the same options. (Compare the "Features" and "Contents" comparison charts to see what I mean. http://www.inspiredacoustics.com/en/pro ... b/overview)
Steve
EDIT: After looking at the "trial" version of this library that's available to download, it would appear that the "unlooped"/"Full" editions may have much shorter sustains than you might want. In that case, the looped versions might be more desirable. But again, the comparison charts contradict themselves (and each other) so often, that it's difficult to determine what the developer meant when naming these libraries the way he did.
I didn't download the trial version, since most of it was for Gigastudio 3, and what was left for Kontakt 2 didn't make much sense, as far as the name. You might want to try that though, to see if it even works well in Kontakt 5.
Steve

