Edward?Rameses wrote:One of the worst DAWs I've ever seen, looks like it's made for children but it's very illogical and inefficient at some points.
FL Studio 12.9 Beta 3
- KVRAF
- 5564 posts since 13 Jan, 2005 from the bottom of my heart
Whoever wants music instead of noise, joy instead of pleasure, soul instead of gold, creative work instead of business, passion instead of foolery, finds no home in this trivial world of ours.
-
- KVRAF
- 7579 posts since 17 Feb, 2005
No, he would have complained about workaroundsmurnau wrote:Edward?Rameses wrote:One of the worst DAWs I've ever seen, looks like it's made for children but it's very illogical and inefficient at some points.
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1052 posts since 2 Dec, 2010 from Belgium, EU.
The giveaway is that 'FL Studio will never be 64 Bit' and will 'never have a Mac version'camsr wrote:No, he would have complained about workaroundsmurnau wrote:Edward?Rameses wrote:One of the worst DAWs I've ever seen, looks like it's made for children but it's very illogical and inefficient at some points.
It's always funny to see the vitriol that DAWs attract. Last time I looked, music was at the tippy-top of Maslow's hierarchy of needs.
...that means music is some sort of 'play'. Play is supposed to be fun
Regards Scott
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1052 posts since 2 Dec, 2010 from Belgium, EU.
Whatever problems you have with it, a large percentage of today's popular music is either made entirely or partially with FL Studio. So, clearly others find it logical.Rameses wrote:One of the worst DAWs I've ever seen, looks like it's made for children but it's very illogical and inefficient at some points.
However, isn't it nice that you have so much choice in DAWs today and don't need to use FL Studio yourself.
Regards Scott
-
- Banned
- 141 posts since 4 May, 2017
Image-Line wrote:Whatever problems you have with it, a large percentage of today's popular music is either made entirely or partially with FL Studio. So, clearly others find it logical.Rameses wrote:One of the worst DAWs I've ever seen, looks like it's made for children but it's very illogical and inefficient at some points.
However, isn't it nice that you have so much choice in DAWs today and don't need to use FL Studio yourself.
Regards Scott
Maybe 5 years ago.a large percentage of today's popular music is either made entirely or partially with FL Studio
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1052 posts since 2 Dec, 2010 from Belgium, EU.
What do you know we don't?gas pump wrote:Maybe 5 years ago.
-
- Banned
- 141 posts since 4 May, 2017
a large percentage of today's popular music is either made entirely or partially with FL Studio
I believe it's up to you to provide evidence to such ridiculous claims.Image-Line wrote:What do you know we don't?gas pump wrote:Maybe 5 years ago.
Just because you sold all those copies, doesn't mean people haven't grown up, moved on and stop using it all together. I would "guess", not like your hard evidence, that there are more people not using it after buying it years ago, then those that are currently using that ancient Frankenstein spaghetti.
If you're going to make such bold statements about the music community, then it's only fitting that you show us proof of such claims. Now back to reality.
-
- KVRAF
- 5200 posts since 17 Aug, 2004
Dude what are you talking about? Yeah back to reality! Just fire up youtube and see for yourself.gas pump wrote:
I believe it's up to you to provide evidence to such ridiculous claims.
Just because you sold all those copies, doesn't mean people haven't grown up, moved on and stop using it all together. I would "guess", not like your hard evidence, that there are more people not using it after buying it years ago, then those that are currently using that ancient Frankenstein spaghetti.
If you're going to make such bold statements about the music community, then it's only fitting that you show us proof of such claims. Now back to reality.
At least one major name in at least one genre and subgenre is using FL Studio (and actually does not care what he uses as long as it works for him) - you can then base your assumption from that.
How does ImageLine claim is different to any other company claim? And why so disrespectful toward company employee? What does he owe you and why do you think it's ridiculous claim? I mean literally thousands and thousands of people are making music with Reason, FL Studio, Live or Bitwig as we speak.
In my very honest opinion (and i am a dick quite sometime) you should be reported to KVR authority if you continue with your parade.
Because of people like yourself there is less and less connection between company representatives on public forums and actual users of particular product.
- KVRist
- 377 posts since 21 Mar, 2012 from Slovakia
Interesting statement. So it is good to know that I'm old "child" and I'm proud of it. I'm happy user of this illogical and inefficient DAW and never have problem to find and do whatever I need even without reading single line in manual.Rameses wrote:One of the worst DAWs I've ever seen, looks like it's made for children but it's very illogical and inefficient at some points.
Why are you wasting your time here?
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1052 posts since 2 Dec, 2010 from Belgium, EU.
Oh hello Edwardgas pump wrote: doesn't mean people haven't grown up, moved on and stop using it all together. I would "guess", not like your hard evidence, that there are more people not using it after buying it years ago, then those that are currently using that ancient Frankenstein spaghetti.
-
- Banned
- 141 posts since 4 May, 2017
Maybe if you believe it's still a relevant DAW in 2018, it will come true. But for the rest of us grounded in the current music industry and audio world, we know exactly who are the big players and who's on the brink of disappearing.kmonkey wrote:Dude what are you talking about? Yeah back to reality! Just fire up youtube and see for yourself.gas pump wrote:
I believe it's up to you to provide evidence to such ridiculous claims.
Just because you sold all those copies, doesn't mean people haven't grown up, moved on and stop using it all together. I would "guess", not like your hard evidence, that there are more people not using it after buying it years ago, then those that are currently using that ancient Frankenstein spaghetti.
If you're going to make such bold statements about the music community, then it's only fitting that you show us proof of such claims. Now back to reality.
At least one major name in at least one genre and subgenre is using FL Studio (and actually does not care what he uses as long as it works for him) - you can then base your assumption from that.
How does ImageLine claim is different to any other company claim? And why so disrespectful toward company employee? What does he owe you and why do you think it's ridiculous claim? I mean literally thousands and thousands of people are making music with Reason, FL Studio, Live or Bitwig as we speak.
In my very honest opinion (and i am a dick quite sometime) you should be reported to KVR authority if you continue with your parade.
Because of people like yourself there is less and less connection between company representatives on public forums and actual users of particular product.
There are at least 10 major DAW companies in this day and age, that alone would barely give you a 10% market stake in the current audio industry. And we all know that the top five big players hold more then 10%, that would be Protools, Studio One, Logic, Ableton and Cubase. You and the rest of the smaller companies would be lucky to have even 5% of the marketplace. Pirated copies don't count.
But what do you expect from someone who works for the company? Spewing marketing jargon and being backed up by fanbois on a mission. Maybe if you spent less time defending your aging relic and actually put that effort into improving it and making it a modern DAW, you might actually have something to argue about.
Instead of trying to cash in on old software with old code and technologies, then rewritten to run on another operating system. Not to mention, that it was announced, released, abandoned then recreated as another project to truly release a working port and not a silly wrapper. I think people have wasted enough time listening to your promises and late deliveries. The ship has sailed on for most of us.
- KVRist
- 143 posts since 9 Mar, 2018 from Frankfurt am Main, Germany
"citation needed"TrojakEW wrote:Interesting statement. So it is good to know that I'm old "child" and I'm proud of it. I'm happy user of this illogical and inefficient DAW and never have problem to find and do whatever I need even without reading single line in manual.Rameses wrote:One of the worst DAWs I've ever seen, looks like it's made for children but it's very illogical and inefficient at some points.
Have fun with your abhorrent amount of steps necessary for using basic functions
For DISCOGRAPHY, see К Ɱ Ԏ Ꮇ Ꮩ Ꭶ Ꭵ Ꮳ
-
- KVRist
- 139 posts since 28 Aug, 2017
Says the one using Sony ACID? LOOOOOOOOOOOOLRameses wrote:"citation needed"TrojakEW wrote:Interesting statement. So it is good to know that I'm old "child" and I'm proud of it. I'm happy user of this illogical and inefficient DAW and never have problem to find and do whatever I need even without reading single line in manual.Rameses wrote:One of the worst DAWs I've ever seen, looks like it's made for children but it's very illogical and inefficient at some points.
Have fun with your abhorrent amount of steps necessary for using basic functions
- KVRist
- 143 posts since 9 Mar, 2018 from Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Hello Scott, (Image-Line wrote:Whatever problems you have with it, a large percentage of today's popular music is either made entirely or partially with FL Studio. So, clearly others find it logical.Rameses wrote:One of the worst DAWs I've ever seen, looks like it's made for children but it's very illogical and inefficient at some points.
However, isn't it nice that you have so much choice in DAWs today and don't need to use FL Studio yourself.
Regards Scott
" a large percentage of today's popular music is either made entirely or partially with FL Studio"
That explains a lot.
For DISCOGRAPHY, see К Ɱ Ԏ Ꮇ Ꮩ Ꭶ Ꭵ Ꮳ
- KVRist
- 143 posts since 9 Mar, 2018 from Frankfurt am Main, Germany
I wasn't using it anymore since 2016 but besides of the frequent crashes it was a decent piece of software. Very intuitive, neutral and straight forward. You need literally one click to create a midi track, the next thing you'll need to do is hit "record". I remember one thing was missing though, it could be fx automation on the master bus or something like that, I don't remember anymore, also the last version (7) was 32 bit and that wasn't cool at all. The syncopation ("swing") in acid wasn't limited to only one syncopation type, it has over 20 different presets and you also can create your own ones which really is unique amongst digital audio workstations, if I recall correctly.HSum wrote:Says the one using Sony ACID?Rameses wrote:
Have fun with your abhorrent amount of steps necessary for using basic functions
For DISCOGRAPHY, see К Ɱ Ԏ Ꮇ Ꮩ Ꭶ Ꭵ Ꮳ
