Sampled synths vs emulations

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Instruments Discussion
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

pdxindy wrote: Sat Apr 06, 2019 6:35 pm
Burillo wrote: Sat Apr 06, 2019 5:51 pmbelieve it or not, some people just don't care for synths that much. when i want a synth, i want "a synth", not "a unique and organic and moving and evolving sound that you haven't heard anywhere else that uses anal phase shift vector hybrid wavetable synthesis"
believe it or not, some people like to play a guitar rather than a sample of a guitar... it has nothing to do with some never before heard sound... (your childish sarcasm aside)
you're conflating two different issues. wanting to play the real deal over samples has nothing to do with what i was talking about.

not to mention that i never said nor implied that everyone should approach synth sounds like me. the "childish sarcasm" you're referring to is my (perhaps poorly worded) attempt to point out that some people don't obsess over tiny details of synths. i don't care that filters in sampled synths may or may not sound authentic enough. i don't care if "samples are integrated into the synth architecture". i just want a buzzing sound, or a wobbling sound, or a synth pad sound. i don't care whether it's audio-rate modulated or whether it's correctly emulating a Moog filter.

the original question was sampled synths versus emulations. many people in this thread fault sampled synths for lack of authenticity and/or not behaving like synths. well, i'm here to tell you that there are people out there that simply don't care about that, and care more about the range of sounds they can get from "a synth" without breaking a sweat. for those people, sampled synths are a viable, and in fact great alternative. i love Syntronik with a passion, and no amount of "but it can't do audio-rate filter FM!" will change that, because i don't care.

Syntronik synth isn't a "real" synth? sure, but i don't care. its filters aren't an authentic enough emulation of a SEM filter? sure, but i don't care. i can't change baked-in oscillator/filter FM? sure, but i don't care. it takes up way more space? sure, but i don't care. i can't do infinite amount of cross-modulation? sure, but i don't care. see how that works? to many in this thread, this sounds like sacrilege, and i perfectly understand this - they love synths. i don't. i just use their sound, whenever i need it.

to go back to your guitar analogy, i actually play guitar. no existing electric guitar library sounds authentic enough for my tastes - and i don't use them. many people do, however - not because their taste is inferior, but because they don't really need an authentic guitar performance, but rather want something that sounds like a guitar but can't necessarily fool people into thinking it was an actual person playing the guitar (similarly how i don't care if i can fool you that i've actually used a real synth). both approaches are valid. same applies to synths.
I don't know what to write here that won't be censored, as I can only speak in profanity.

Post

Burillo wrote: Sat Apr 06, 2019 7:23 pm i love Syntronik with a passion, and no amount of "but it can't do audio-rate filter FM!" will change that, because i don't care.

Syntronik synth isn't a "real" synth? sure, but i don't care. its filters aren't an authentic enough emulation of a SEM filter? sure, but i don't care. i can't change baked-in oscillator/filter FM? sure, but i don't care. it takes up way more space? sure, but i don't care. i can't do infinite amount of cross-modulation? sure, but i don't care. see how that works? to many in this thread, this sounds like sacrilege, and i perfectly understand this - they love synths. i don't. i just use their sound, whenever i need it.
Well stated, Burillo! :clap:

Post

Burillo wrote: Sat Apr 06, 2019 5:51 pm anal phase shift vector

that can be embarrassing in company.
:ud:

Post

just use either or both creatively. people like
to be entertained, not annoyed.
and what annoys some entertains others
and vise versa.
so the real question is, are you entertaining or
annoying more people?
and do you even care?
HW SYNTHS [KORG T2EX - AKAI AX80 - YAMAHA SY77 - ENSONIQ VFX]
HW MODULES [OBi M1000 - ROLAND MKS-50 - ROLAND JV880 - KURZ 1000PX]
SW [CHARLATAN - OBXD - OXE - ELEKTRO - MICROTERA - M1 - SURGE - RMiV]
DAW [ENERGY XT2/1U RACK WINXP / MAUDIO 1010LT PCI]

Post

I'll take a good emulation like RePro, Diva, or Legend any day. :tu:

Samplers can be loads of fun, but sampled synths not so much. It's the inflexibility of a sampled synth that I don't like. It's like using presets and not being able to edit it much.
It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. - Jiddu Krishnamurti

Post

layzer wrote: Sat Apr 06, 2019 8:01 pm just use either or both creatively. people like
to be entertained, not annoyed.
and what annoys some entertains others
and vise versa.
so the real question is, are you entertaining or
annoying more people?
and do you even care?
I try to annoy as many people as possible :lol:

Post

ghostboi wrote: Sat Apr 06, 2019 4:35 pm
pdxindy wrote: Sat Apr 06, 2019 4:33 pm no contest... real synths... samples are static. Samples are like Photos and synths are Video with movement and life!
But i mean emulations like tal repro , which are not real
PLease educate yourself before starting a thread like this
You're making a fool out of yourself .
I could tell you what a sampled based synth can not do , but I won't ..it's YOUR task to do the research and gain experience .
If you can not grasp or understand the fundamentals of syntrhesis , then it's o.k. to start a thread and ask people's opnions ,advice etc..


It's threads like these that make this nice forum a complete kindergarten , it's effin sad .
Eyeball exchanging
Soul calibrating ..frequencies

Post

gentleclockdivider wrote: Sat Apr 06, 2019 9:16 pm
ghostboi wrote: Sat Apr 06, 2019 4:35 pm
pdxindy wrote: Sat Apr 06, 2019 4:33 pm no contest... real synths... samples are static. Samples are like Photos and synths are Video with movement and life!
But i mean emulations like tal repro , which are not real
PLease educate yourself before starting a thread like this
You're making a fool out of yourself .
I could tell you what a sampled based synth can not do , but I won't ..it's YOUR task to do the research and gain experience .
If you can not grasp or understand the fundamentals of syntrhesis , then it's o.k. to start a thread and ask people's opnions ,advice etc..


It's threads like these that make this nice forum a complete kindergarten , it's effin sad .
and posts like this help...you start out by attacking the guy, then continue by saying he shouldn't contribute until he has experience, then blame the forum you are a part of...open your eyes. We all started somewhere, if you think he needs some education give him advice, not personal attacks...please grow up before making posts like this
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.

Post

pdxindy wrote: Sat Apr 06, 2019 4:33 pm no contest... real synths... samples are static. Samples are like Photos and synths are Video with movement and life!
'xactly.

Post

I don't care at all about 'what about the end result, isn't it the same' or 'are people fooled it's real' or any of that. The goalpost seemed to be 'isn't it just as good if not better' and the bias there was confirmed by some and not by others. I'm in the camp of 'no, because it's not doing the same thing' when doing that thing is a more rewarding experience, at least potentially.

"but u can tweak the... filter" and you're tweaking a facsimile, morphing snapshots of, it's a fact-based discussion at that point.
Realism in terms of a synth sample is an odd and not that interesting digression for me.
Last edited by jancivil on Sat Apr 06, 2019 9:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

so in this case the op turned out to bring attention to himself, he now lives up to his name...lock it or leave it

btw that doesn't change my post above as said poster had no way of knowing this guy was a sockpuppet, my post above reflects how often threads go quickly awry
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.

Post

it seemed almost purely argumentative to me, like an axe grinding

Locked

Return to “Instruments”