my understanding of it is (i may be wrong as am not a VST expert) is that the number of instances you can run of it is what makes or breaks it. There is a fellow on another forum who claims to have 30 instances of Zebra running in project and its stable. Maybe due to Zebra's modular nature and you can make very light on CPU patches. I don't know.irvg wrote: Thu Jan 07, 2021 8:22 am Just got Hive 2, love it and finding it much lower on CPU than Diva, which I also have. Also found Zebra to be lower on CPU than Diva. But it does depend on the patch; you can get almost any synth to take a lot of CPU if you try hard enough. The question is how much the average patch takes, and which features of the synth you need and use (especially unison and oversampling).
If you were to try 30 instances of Massive X or Hive, will it be stable? One instance of Massive X pretty much loads up the entire synth, no?
