Dynamic convolution plug

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Effects Discussion
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Blue Days quoth Ahh it Djens again.

You shouldn't believe anything people (or other entities) tell you Djens! ;)


http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:suat ... +vst&hl=en

What, not even your own web page, and the mention of 'possibly the best limiter in the world' at only $450??
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

jens wrote:it's pronounced 'yenns', not 'Djens'
Ok, Hans..

:hihi:

Post

Sicklecell666 quoth
Ok, Hans..



No, that's 'Huns'.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

Ok, I will put it in a wording even Whyterabbyt can comprehend and accept as a valid opinion.

Current FFT processes changes the signal in a way I would not, and most would not, call a high fidelity way, and is unsuitable for mastering processes.

Djens, it's a wordplay, which only a million people around the world will understand.

Post

"Currently I am just one man running
this site, and I am not a developer,
a not really a programmer either. "


Loosely translated:

"Not only am I the Hair Club for Men President, but I'm also a client.."

Image

Post

whyterabbyt wrote:Blue Days quoth Ahh it Djens again.

You shouldn't believe anything people (or other entities) tell you Djens! ;)


http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:suat ... +vst&hl=en

What, not even your own web page, and the mention of 'possibly the best limiter in the world' at only $450??
This is true, I priced it initially at $450, because I figured it would root out all other limiters on the market.

You can hear the limiter in action here, this is only my ihsan-vst EQ, and ihsan-vst Adaptive Limiter, used for mastering.

http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=948091

I will probably investigate into what price I should charge for it in the future, when the GUI version is released.
And FYI the limiter was guiless then, and wrapped in a synthedit userinterface.
The final version will not be.

If people told you it was bad, and not used any "custom modules" this is untrue.

Post

Blue Days quoth Ok, I will put it in a wording even Whyterabbyt can comprehend and accept as a valid opinion.

Current FFT processes changes the signal in a way I would not, and most would not, call a high fidelity way, and is unsuitable for mastering processes.



Its an opinion. As to its validity, there are plenty of people around here, and elsewhere, who find Voxengo and Waves plugins more than suitable for mastering, so you may be in the minority here. Then again, you are the non-programmer who created 'possibly the best limiter in the world.'

Although apparantly it may have the odd problem or two
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

Iamweakandinsecureandtrytohideitbyusing666: You are a bit of a noise factor aren't you.

Post

Blue Days wrote:Iamweakandinsecureandtrytohideitbyusing666: You are a bit of a noise factor aren't you.
I'm a BIG f**king noise factor you twat headed charlatan..How about you have a nice cup of STFU & leave the discussion to those that know what the hell they're talking about, eh?

:roll:

Post

I also do not comprehend why people choose to be lowlifes like this.

Yes, it's true I'm not really a programmer.
I am a musician who sat down and wrote The Best Limiter In The World.

Alhamdulillah.

Took me about 5 years.

Post

Some people certainly dont seem to agree there's an issue with using convolution for dynamics processing.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

Blue Days quoth
I am a musician who sat down and wrote The Best Limiter In The World.


Correction. What you think to be the best limiter in the world. There's nothing corroborative from anywhere else that I can see, and comments on your tracks recently posted at KVR seem to refer to dynamics and EQ issues. How many did you sell?
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

Blue Days, you seriously need to get your hands on a Sintefex unit.. then at least you would know what truly hi-fidelity sound/compression/eq is all about. Like they keep saying on the pro-rec forum, people that have heard the unit have NEVER had anything bad to say about it's sound nor process and people who haven't well.. they bitch and moan how shit it sounds. :lol: :roll:

Cheers!
bManic

Post

Sicklecell666 wrote:
jens wrote:it's pronounced 'yenns', not 'Djens'
Ok, Hans..

:hihi:

I thought Frits was spelled with an F?
My other host is Bruce Forsyth

Post

Blue Days wrote: Current FFT processes changes the signal in a way I would not, and most would not, call a high fidelity way, and is unsuitable for mastering processes.
Unfortunately, the human ear works on the same basis as the FFT and most digital equipment you are ever likely to own contains a digital filter of some sorts (that was probably designed using an FFT).

So, don't be too quick to dismiss the FFT. Without it, the world would certainly be low fidelity all the way.
Image

Post Reply

Return to “Effects”