Intel PCI express (915E) chipset - A hidden drag?
-
- KVRian
- 1184 posts since 27 Apr, 2004 from Houston, Texas
....
I recently purchased a laptop (dell 9200 inspiron) and before I did, I spoke to a lot of the custom audio laptop companies. their feeling was the pci express was definitely bad for audio...but like you mentioned...great for gamers.
anyway, i am glad that i got a board without that. maybe things have changed (this was a couple of months ago) but i am not sure.
also...I thought it was a good thread to start. making a huge investment like a laptop is major...and eventhough technology advances every second, there is nothing wrong with doing as much research as you can before hand.
I recently purchased a laptop (dell 9200 inspiron) and before I did, I spoke to a lot of the custom audio laptop companies. their feeling was the pci express was definitely bad for audio...but like you mentioned...great for gamers.
anyway, i am glad that i got a board without that. maybe things have changed (this was a couple of months ago) but i am not sure.
also...I thought it was a good thread to start. making a huge investment like a laptop is major...and eventhough technology advances every second, there is nothing wrong with doing as much research as you can before hand.
-
- KVRer
- 11 posts since 20 Feb, 2005
PCI Latency Tool v2.3
http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=951
http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=951
-
- KVRist
- 69 posts since 28 Sep, 2004 from UK
PCI Latency Tool looks really good, and what's more the functionality to keep settings on reboot is free, unlike DoubleDawg.
PCI Latency Tool listed more items in total. However, Doubledawg listed items which PCI Latency Tool didn't, such as the Intel Motherboard AC97 Audio controller.
Given that the go6800 is on PCIExpress, perhaps these utilities can't handle latency in the same way? Dunno...
PCI Latency Tool listed more items in total. However, Doubledawg listed items which PCI Latency Tool didn't, such as the Intel Motherboard AC97 Audio controller.
Given that the go6800 is on PCIExpress, perhaps these utilities can't handle latency in the same way? Dunno...
-
- KVRer
- 11 posts since 20 Feb, 2005
yaaaaaaayyy!
im in acpi mode right now, and everything is working great. i can get my latency in fruityloops down as low as it goes (although its a little sketchy with some plugins -ie pro53). there are no dropouts, no clicks...nothing.
what did i do? i disabled mini-PCI in the bios, which is what my dell 1450 wireless card uses. so far, it's been 45 minutes of my banging on it (figuratively) and there's been no problems.
once im 100% convinced, im going to enable it and play with the settings for the card (in the properties section).
btw, im running service pack 1a. baby steps....
im in acpi mode right now, and everything is working great. i can get my latency in fruityloops down as low as it goes (although its a little sketchy with some plugins -ie pro53). there are no dropouts, no clicks...nothing.
what did i do? i disabled mini-PCI in the bios, which is what my dell 1450 wireless card uses. so far, it's been 45 minutes of my banging on it (figuratively) and there's been no problems.
once im 100% convinced, im going to enable it and play with the settings for the card (in the properties section).
btw, im running service pack 1a. baby steps....
-
- KVRAF
- 1602 posts since 14 Oct, 2002
yeah!
thanx illwfafer!!!!
your reports are sooo usefulll!!
if you use ableton live you can try if you want
http://www.ableton.com/forum/viewtopic. ... =benchmark
maybe it works with demo too
lalo
thanx illwfafer!!!!
your reports are sooo usefulll!!
if you use ableton live you can try if you want
http://www.ableton.com/forum/viewtopic. ... =benchmark
maybe it works with demo too
lalo
-
- KVRer
- 11 posts since 20 Feb, 2005
lalo,
i installed ableton just for you. here were my results:
1) 19% (peak at 20%, would drop to 18%)
2) Dell Inspiron 9300
3) Windows XP Pro (SP2)
4) Pentium M 760 (2GHz/533MHz FSB)
5) 2GB Ram, PC-4200
6) Edirol Firewire FA-101 (MME/DirectX)
7) 60GB 7200rpm Ultra ATA HD (Hitachi)
i installed ableton just for you. here were my results:
1) 19% (peak at 20%, would drop to 18%)
2) Dell Inspiron 9300
3) Windows XP Pro (SP2)
4) Pentium M 760 (2GHz/533MHz FSB)
5) 2GB Ram, PC-4200
6) Edirol Firewire FA-101 (MME/DirectX)
7) 60GB 7200rpm Ultra ATA HD (Hitachi)
-
- KVRAF
- 1602 posts since 14 Oct, 2002
illwfafer wrote:lalo,
i installed ableton just for you. here were my results:
1) 19% (peak at 20%, would drop to 18%)
2) Dell Inspiron 9300
3) Windows XP Pro (SP2)
4) Pentium M 760 (2GHz/533MHz FSB)
5) 2GB Ram, PC-4200
6) Edirol Firewire FA-101 (MME/DirectX)
7) 60GB 7200rpm Ultra ATA HD (Hitachi)
so the puter is on top of the list
great!!
do you use DX/MME drivers?
impressive..i thought you use ASIO
lalo
-
- KVRer
- 11 posts since 20 Feb, 2005
in case anyone cares:
ive read that the intel 2915 is a good card to have if you are going to be using firewire audio. i may swap my dell 1450 for the 2915.
ive disabled the 'a' band on the 1450, and that seems to have solved the problem too.
ive read that the intel 2915 is a good card to have if you are going to be using firewire audio. i may swap my dell 1450 for the 2915.
ive disabled the 'a' band on the 1450, and that seems to have solved the problem too.
-
- KVRist
- 179 posts since 15 Oct, 2003 from Norway
I am also looking into a 915 system. The Clevo M400A/Sager 4880 actually. Though being based on 915PM it still uses DDR1.
Anyway, from the Nuendo forum:
Anyway, from the Nuendo forum:
According to Intel, X, G and P are ATX boards while PM is the only notebook board.It would be great if someone tested some of the Sonoma machines with Nuendo or Cubase.
They've been out since january, some one could have done it by now![]()
Copuple of days ago, friend of mine pointed me to Digidesign webpage, where they have Dell Inspiron 6000 (new Sonoma laptop) in the list of the recomended laptops for Mbox. While on the sam page they state that "Digidesign's Mbox is not compatible with Intel 925X, 915G or 915P chipsets". So there might be something different with mobile 915PM?
-
- KVRist
- 69 posts since 28 Sep, 2004 from UK
Just read some more about this. Apparently with the ATI Radeon PCI-e mobile graphics cards, it is possible to change the number of pipelines the card uses. This is done using an ATI app called Powerplay. Powerplay scales the capability of the card to fit your power settings, i.e. the card drops in power if you are on battery. But you can use Powerplay to force the card to use only 1 of the 16 pipelines available. I have read this has fixed audio problems for some people.
Can't find where I read this now, but I'll keep looking...
Can't find where I read this now, but I'll keep looking...
-
- KVRist
- 179 posts since 15 Oct, 2003 from Norway
notebookforums.com ?Holf wrote:Just read some more about this. Apparently with the ATI Radeon PCI-e mobile graphics cards, it is possible to change the number of pipelines the card uses. This is done using an ATI app called Powerplay. Powerplay scales the capability of the card to fit your power settings, i.e. the card drops in power if you are on battery. But you can use Powerplay to force the card to use only 1 of the 16 pipelines available. I have read this has fixed audio problems for some people.
Can't find where I read this now, but I'll keep looking...
-
- KVRer
- 4 posts since 2 Jun, 2005 from UK
AUTO-ADMIN: Non-MP3, WAV, OGG, SoundCloud, YouTube, Vimeo, Twitter and Facebook links in this post have been protected automatically. Once the member reaches 5 posts the links will function as normal.
Hi Illfwafer, you're a Gent, any chance you could possibly try out the Orangine, Five Towers, and Thonex stress-tests for measuring performance in Cubase SX, with as low latencies as possible, please? (As discussed on the Nuendo forums here (http://forum.nuendo.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=706&).I think the links to the tests are:
http://www.citriq.com/sonomatica/sistem ... t%20SX.rar (http://www.citriq.com/sonomatica/sistemas/Orangine-Stress%20Test%20SX.rar)
http://www.adkproaudio.com/downloads.cfm (http://www.adkproaudio.com/downloads.cfm)
http://www.moar.net/cubasetest/index.shtml (http://www.moar.net/cubasetest/index.shtml)
Would be very grateful, if poss!
Emog
-
- KVRer
- 4 posts since 2 Jun, 2005 from UK
AUTO-ADMIN: Non-MP3, WAV, OGG, SoundCloud, YouTube, Vimeo, Twitter and Facebook links in this post have been protected automatically. Once the member reaches 5 posts the links will function as normal.
Actually, disabling the Wireless aspect of the 915 platform could tally (?).
(http://www.intel.com/products/i/chipsets/mobile/915pm_diagram_760.gif)(from: http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/20050511/index.html (http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/20050511/index.html))
That block diagram appears to show that the PCI buss is not shared by the PCI-E graphics, but by the Wireless aspect? Also, what is "PCI Down"?
Could all these latency/CPU audio problems with the 915-based (Sonoma) platform indeed all be avoided by just doing similarly to Illwfafer, and deactivating and tweaking certain aspects? Or does it go deeper than that, affecting the communication and processing between chips on the chipset, rather than the peripheral/PCI pipelines?
The music I intend to do will be very intensive on the computer (realtime multi-channel effects) and good, solid low latency functionality would be highly desirable.
Thanks,
Emog
