Don't know if anyone noticed... VST3

DSP, Plugin and Host development discussion.
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
stefancrs wrote:For certain scenarios it makes perfect sense to have them interleaved from a performance point of view (vectorized code and whatnot).
Still not useful. We can't vectorize 4 doubles on current processors - we can only vectorize 2 and that limits its applications to 2 channel audio only. If you think about graphics card computing, they do not require interleaved data - it can even hurt performance AFAIK.
64bit doubles is "the way to go" now? If so, that's too bad imho. But I guess the market will go there anyway.

Post

stefancrs wrote:64bit doubles is "the way to go" now? If so, that's too bad imho. But I guess the market will go there anyway.
Both 32-bit floats and 64-bit doubles can be supported, but IMO 32-bit floats are fading away: having 64-bit internal precision in plug-in is not a marketing advantage anymore because almost every developer uses 64-bit doubles internally. Beside that quad cores and faster RAM allow to run everything in double precision.

Anyway, small API details like this should undergo voting after discussion that mentions all the pros and cons takes place.
Image

Post

Agreed :)

Post

jones-y wrote:
Steiny wrote:Routing Possibilities
Plug-ins can be connected to the host environment in many different ways: Future VST3 Instruments can have audio inputs.
So when are we gonna see plugin samplers that can actually sample???
That has always been a Cubase deficiency and has nothing at all to do with VST3.
The VST 2 specification does not state that a VSTi can't have audio inputs. Nowhere. My hosts have supported this all the time.
"Until you spread your wings, you'll have no idea how far you can walk." Image

Post

Everyone is surrounding the dance floor but no one wants to go on first. Gotta love humans :)
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion,
It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed,
The hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning,
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

Post

lowkey wrote:Everyone is surrounding the dance floor but no one wants to go on first. Gotta love humans :)
If that's some sarcasm towards 'new spec' endeavor, you've missed something. :)
Image

Post

Aleksey Vaneev wrote:No, it's not. As for me, I would have to de-interleave and re-interleave the stream. (I do that already if host supplies such data to an AudioUnit).
Wasn't interleaved banned after AU V1.0 was deprecated and stroustrupped into AU2.0? :)

Post

I'd be more than happy to go first. Unfortunately, the creators of the SDK didn't see fit to actually give us a version that worked. Don't know if you've been paying attention or not, but this kit is hopelessly f**ked. If I had my druthers, we'd start releasing VST3 versions of our entire product line next week. But that simply ain't gonna be happening at this point.

Post

IM juat a user but damn, If I won the lotto, I'd pay you guys to come up with a new open platform free of steinsucks rule. I would pay a mil a year. :)

Seriously though, How feasible is a new platform that lets say could have a site devoted to news and updates and even tutorials about the development of said plugin standard? So that new people could come in and learn the dsp programming and even talk to some of the experienced coders to get real life help and not a shit arsed pdf? Plus it could also feature full page ad's in all the trades to help sell the idea as a viable alternative to the old standard. Something like IEEE but for audio/midi. And please replace midi! Shits older then Jesus' shoes! :D

Post

Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
lowkey wrote:Everyone is surrounding the dance floor but no one wants to go on first. Gotta love humans :)
If that's some sarcasm towards 'new spec' endeavor, you've missed something. :)
No sarcasm or insult intended :)
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion,
It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed,
The hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning,
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

Post

I'm definitely going study the vst 3 technology but I'm going to take my time like I do everything.





















I'm the tortoise who wins the race.

Post

For what it's worth... I am dying to see an OPiS

Open Plug-in Standard !

or perhaps an OPuS

Open Plug-in Standard.

Not to be confused with opensource plugins ;)

.t

Post

Tallisman wrote:For what it's worth... I am dying to see an OPiS

Open Plug-in Standard !

or perhaps an OPuS

Open Plug-in Standard.

Not to be confused with opensource plugins ;)

.t
how about Open Studio eXtensions :hihi:

DSP
Image

Post

I kinda like the ring of FST. 8)
Cakewalk by Bandlab / FL Studio
Squire Stratocaster / Chapman ML3 Modern V2 / Fender Precision Bass

Formerly known as arke, VladimirDimitrievich, bslf, and ctmg. Yep, those bans were deserved.

Post

Chris Walton wrote:I kinda like the ring of FST. 8)
We can vote later.
Image

Post Reply

Return to “DSP and Plugin Development”