KVR Audio

olikana · Post by **olikana** » Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:48 pm

chk071 wrote:
metal wrote:
demo feature perhaps??
I think the only demo restriction is that you can't save your presets... must be a bug.

can't save preset, can't load preset.....and it doesn't save its settings with the project

(as i learnt the hard way the other day while doing a little tune)
in any case the demo is fully functional otherwise ...gotta treat it as an analog synth ;P

anyway i'll buy it soon ...for 40$ i shouldn't even wait but i have a strict 1 week trial before buy policy . so a couple more days...

twolegstoneworks · Post by **twolegstoneworks** » Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:50 pm

olikana wrote: anyway i'll buy it soon ...for 40$ i shouldn't even wait but i have a strict 1 week trial before buy policy . so a couple more days...

I was quite prepared to by it too, but this bug makes me glad I didn't.. will wait for it to be fixed I think.

chk071 · Post by **chk071** » Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:51 pm

olikana wrote: anyway i'll buy it soon ...for 40$ i shouldn't even wait but i have a strict 1 week trial before buy policy . so a couple more days...

Sounds like a good cure against GAS.

Ingonator · Post by **Ingonator** » Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:10 pm

deleted

evilplazma · Post by **evilplazma** » Wed Jul 10, 2013 12:55 am

Here is a demo of both TAL Bassline versions

EnGee · Post by **EnGee** » Wed Jul 10, 2013 3:45 am

The demo is disappointing

I demoed it in OS X and my smile and eagerness disappeared after 10 mins! I don't know I think I just don't like the sound of it (although I love the sound of LuSh and NoiseMaker). It is not interesting whatever I tweak the slides. I hope they are just bugs (but I had the impression it just sounds like that).
I would preferred NoiseMaker II with more modulations and other additions. This is IMO a much better investment.

Ingonator · Post by **Ingonator** » Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:14 am

deleted

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:17 am

Ingonator wrote: This is an accurate emulation of a real SH-101

Ingo

There it is

great for bouncy basslines and bubbly acid

Ingonator · Post by **Ingonator** » Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:21 am

deleted

samsam · Post by **samsam** » Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:28 am

I demand this 101 clone sound more like a CS80. Most disappointing.

Ingonator · Post by **Ingonator** » Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:39 am

deleted

samsam · Post by **samsam** » Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:35 am

^ My post was being silly - absurd on purpose, sorry if that wasn't clear. As I've said elsewhere in the thread, I used to own a 101 and think this plugin is great!

EnGee · Post by **EnGee** » Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:41 am

Ingonator wrote:
This is an accurate emulation of a real SH-101

Yes I thought so. For me, it means: Avoid Roland 'real' emulations!

so if you don't like it you'll also not like the real SH-101.

I'm sure of it now

cyberheater · Post by **cyberheater** » Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:41 am

So a couple of things I've noticed between the TAL-BassLine-101 and TAL-U-NO-LX.

* The bassline sounds brighter with the filters opened up all the way.
* The bassline consumers less CPU when used in poly mode and using the TAL chorus then on the TAL-U-NO-LX. Even when the patch settings are identical. What's that about.

Ingonator · Post by **Ingonator** » Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:42 am

deleted

TAL BassLine-101