Native Instruments released Reaktor 6 !
-
- KVRist
- 406 posts since 27 Feb, 2014 from France
after using R6 for some day overall i enjoy but the best is to come..once the library will be full of R6 ensemble.. patching block is too much time consuming the workflow is not that great.. you have to go in the structure it's a pain compared to patching directly module like on a synth like bazille or a real modular(just think when you want to try a block, then a other one ect..it take lot of time to check the result of what you have in mind). the sound of the oscs and filters are better compared to R5 , to me it sounds like Ni/reaktor stuff but i like that caractere here and there in my music..it's a bit rought sounding with good depth.
Analog electronic drum samples (Free demo pack)
http://www.syntheticwav.com
http://www.syntheticwav.com
-
- Banned
- 2238 posts since 19 Dec, 2014
I guess I'll be upgrading to the next Komplete Bundle if at least a Kontakt 6 will be included too.
Currently on Komplete 7
there was some talk in the advertising blurb on better maschine integration (with Reaktor 6) ...can anyone comment on this ?
Currently on Komplete 7
there was some talk in the advertising blurb on better maschine integration (with Reaktor 6) ...can anyone comment on this ?
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
Liking blocks, particularly exposing Monark filter for easy patching. This would be a no-brainer for me, but for requiring Mavericks to run it. I can't support that, I would have to go through other changes I'm not going to do. I have a stable setup and this is not enough to spur me to chase the OS and add concerns I don't have now. This is where NI loses me, this is too much; I finally moved on up to 10.8.5 on both machines chasing Kontakt 5. OS 10.8 is, except for a coupla cute (& trivial) things, no improvement, it's a step down in performance for me.
Last edited by jancivil on Sat Sep 19, 2015 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 24405 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Seems like you can still install it on 10.8 with some trickery.
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
Really? That would work for me. I was able to avoid moving from 10.6.8 for a long time with a couple of strategies. But they made that impossible after a point, seems like it was at Kontakt 5.3.1, Reaktor 5.9.2 where they did totally break the installer for 10.6 and changed the kernel. I'll have to look into it.
-
Winstontaneous Winstontaneous https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=98336
- KVRAF
- 2591 posts since 15 Feb, 2006 from Another Green World
IMO OSX 10.9 is worth it for native Multiple Tabs in Finder, incredibly helpful for me...
Money is tight but R6 upgrade is very tempting!
Money is tight but R6 upgrade is very tempting!
-
- KVRian
- 1207 posts since 16 Sep, 2006
I've already learned a bunch about synthesizers after purchasing the upgrade. I'm not sure I'll ever build a great, or even good one. But the things I'm learning have wide-spanning applicability.Winstontaneous wrote:IMO OSX 10.9 is worth it for native Multiple Tabs in Finder, incredibly helpful for me...
Money is tight but R6 upgrade is very tempting!
But I can sympathize with those who want to wait for K11. For me, Ku10 was an excellent (if not devastatingly sensational) upgrade, and I was glad I waited on buying the new stuff before that one. But I must say, I find Reaktor 6 to really pay off, it's 99 dollars I feel I've already got back. Easily.
Just my opinion, and please understand that I've applied myself diligently to this synth post-purchase, hitting the tutorials hard. Especially ASDR, but there some other great ones on youtube as well.
Ha ha suck it!
- KVRian
- 510 posts since 27 Apr, 2013 from Denmark
Speaking of Komplete, there's now an option for downloading the full bundle or update. Neat.
- KVRist
- 260 posts since 30 Aug, 2011 from Melbourne, Australia
I thought maybe the Synthesis Technology (Paul Schreiber) MOTM 440 filter, which is a beautiful analog filter btw. Just a guess though.Echoes in the Attic wrote:Anyone know what the Paul filter is based on? It's described as modeled after early polyphonic analogs (even though it's under the modern section of modules which is weird).
Edit: Paul.. polyphonic analog... Prophet... duh.
A composer is a guy who goes around forcing his will on unsuspecting air molecules, often with the assistance of unsuspecting musicians. - FZ
-
- KVRAF
- 2209 posts since 2 Jan, 2003 from right here...
...you may be right with some remarks here, but if look at it the other way around - how do you change a module in Bazille or Modular V or even in your hardware modular? It's not possible or requires to use your screwdriver. And do you really like that cable clutter (never understood why this has to be emulated, too)? I think, for what it does and considering the alternatives the block framework is very user-friendly...Synthetic Wav wrote:patching block is too much time consuming the workflow is not that great.. you have to go in the structure it's a pain compared to patching directly module like on a synth like bazille or a real modular(just think when you want to try a block, then a other one ect..it take lot of time to check the result of what you have in mind).
- KVRAF
- 26931 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
I don't think it is a matter of emulating cables... it's that the cables work better for this circumstance... what other approach would you try if you were a developer?loachm wrote:...you may be right with some remarks here, but if look at it the other way around - how do you change a module in Bazille or Modular V or even in your hardware modular? It's not possible or requires to use your screwdriver. And do you really like that cable clutter (never understood why this has to be emulated, too)? I think, for what it does and considering the alternatives the block framework is very user-friendly...Synthetic Wav wrote:patching block is too much time consuming the workflow is not that great.. you have to go in the structure it's a pain compared to patching directly module like on a synth like bazille or a real modular(just think when you want to try a block, then a other one ect..it take lot of time to check the result of what you have in mind).
- KVRAF
- 3812 posts since 20 Apr, 2005
The blocks do sound great from the demos.zerocrossing wrote:Me._leras wrote: Oh come on. Who really needs a demo for Reaktor.
.
I'm wondering if I should update now or wait until K11. It all depends on what this thing sounds like using the blocks with feedback and modulating the filter at audio rates. If it handles those kind of things really well, I'll buy the update now, get a faster PC and 96khz machine to run it. If not that money's going to fund an SE80.
Does anyone have a demo that showcases these features? My dream is to find a synth that does great osc feedback and audio rate modulation. Diva, though good, isn't cutting it. Too polite.
If that isn't enough the 'factory' library is already pretty immense and covers many many bases. Synths, samplers, effects.
And then there is the user library which would take forever to through all the ensembles.
It does have a small learning curve, so *if* you think you want reaktor then the sooner you jump in the better. It's not what you'd get from fiddling with a demo, it's what you get several months later when more familiar with it.
* and that is not including getting into the really low level details, which would just take years...
-
- KVRist
- 406 posts since 27 Feb, 2014 from France
yes i should add on a big screen it might be less of a issu, but here it s either the structure or the pannel..that won t stop me using it anyway just the workflow could maybe be improved.pdxindy wrote:I don't think it is a matter of emulating cables... it's that the cables work better for this circumstance... what other approach would you try if you were a developer?loachm wrote:...you may be right with some remarks here, but if look at it the other way around - how do you change a module in Bazille or Modular V or even in your hardware modular? It's not possible or requires to use your screwdriver. And do you really like that cable clutter (never understood why this has to be emulated, too)? I think, for what it does and considering the alternatives the block framework is very user-friendly...Synthetic Wav wrote:patching block is too much time consuming the workflow is not that great.. you have to go in the structure it's a pain compared to patching directly module like on a synth like bazille or a real modular(just think when you want to try a block, then a other one ect..it take lot of time to check the result of what you have in mind).
i can't wait to try some newer ensemble that use these filters and oscs
Analog electronic drum samples (Free demo pack)
http://www.syntheticwav.com
http://www.syntheticwav.com
-
- KVRist
- 406 posts since 27 Feb, 2014 from France
you have to try this guys, awesome for madness https://www.native-instruments.com/fr/r ... show/8837/
https://www.native-instruments.com/fr/r ... show/8831/
R6 is really a step forward , when you think it's just the begining it's gonna be huge
https://www.native-instruments.com/fr/r ... show/8831/
R6 is really a step forward , when you think it's just the begining it's gonna be huge
Analog electronic drum samples (Free demo pack)
http://www.syntheticwav.com
http://www.syntheticwav.com
