briefcasemanx wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 9:51 pm You mean, I have to write "in my opinion" in every single post in a discussion forum.![]()
Check your own post history and see if you've done that.
Read again what you wrote and what I wrote - from your context. Emphasize context.
Or... if you want to act smart and actually be smart then answer your own paradox:
So having more options automatically makes a synth inferior or comparable to a Serum? Fascinating. Please, enlighten me—how does less creative control somehow result in better sound?
Where’s the magic number? How many options are just right before a synth becomes ‘too much’ for the poor user to handle? Please, share your wisdom.
If a synth with "millions" of options doesn’t sound better or yield better results, could it be that the real limitation isn’t the synth… but the person using it?
Or the problem isn’t having tons of sound design possibilities—it’s just that some people don’t know what to do with them. Are you one of them? Oh, are you? Then just say so that way instead of portraying the upcoming product problematic.
