Sure. Right now I've got grub giving me a choice of XP and Ubuntu. I'm a bit afraid to remove ubuntu in case I can't boot into XP afterwards was what I meant...sirTUXalot wrote:Dual booting is really easy....
re: easy linux stuff, for the upcoming XT2 :)
-
- KVRAF
- 7217 posts since 21 Aug, 2004 from Trondheim, Norway
Rakkervoksen
-
- KVRian
- 646 posts since 3 Mar, 2005 from Oslo, No(r)way
That's not a problem. Or atleast should not be if you don't screw it real up.Hovmod wrote:Sure. Right now I've got grub giving me a choice of XP and Ubuntu. I'm a bit afraid to remove ubuntu in case I can't boot into XP afterwards was what I meant...sirTUXalot wrote:Dual booting is really easy....
Say YES to OpenSource Software!!
-
- KVRian
- 646 posts since 3 Mar, 2005 from Oslo, No(r)way
With custom kernels under linux, leighweight wms and someZ3R0T0N1N wrote:oh boy... here we go.
win can't match os x??? or linux??? for pro audio....
ouch.
tweaking Win can't be compared to Linux at all.
Just compare latency on the two platforms, Linux beats the hell out of Win.
Say YES to OpenSource Software!!
-
- KVRAF
- 25049 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
jazzride2006 wrote:a bit tiredZ3R0T0N1N wrote:oh boy... here we go.
win can't match os x??? or linux??? for pro audio....
ouch.
for pro audio : my opinion: mac or linux, never win...
(...)
sounds nice - is bullshit though
-
- KVRAF
- 25049 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
zOap wrote:With custom kernels under linux, leighweight wms and someZ3R0T0N1N wrote:oh boy... here we go.
win can't match os x??? or linux??? for pro audio....
ouch.
tweaking Win can't be compared to Linux at all.
Just compare latency on the two platforms, Linux beats the hell out of Win.
nice how so many people mention the wm - ever tried to measure the consumption of the greedy bastard Explorer?
The wm does not affect the performance in a significant way on modern machines...
-
- KVRian
- 646 posts since 3 Mar, 2005 from Oslo, No(r)way
jens wrote:zOap wrote:With custom kernels under linux, leighweight wms and someZ3R0T0N1N wrote:oh boy... here we go.
win can't match os x??? or linux??? for pro audio....
ouch.
tweaking Win can't be compared to Linux at all.
Just compare latency on the two platforms, Linux beats the hell out of Win.
nice how so many people mention the wm - ever tried to measure the consumption of the greedy bastard Explorer?
The wm does not affect the performance in a significant way on modern machines...
Say YES to OpenSource Software!!