Update: 'TesslaSE' 1.2 signal modelling VSTfx
- KVRAF
- 1721 posts since 17 Jul, 2001 from Milan, Italy
if you need hosting for this file just contact me via PM...my webspace has unlimited bandwidth and disk space....
-
- KVRAF
- 5629 posts since 22 Sep, 2005
The same thing for Rescue_Release_1.0... But you can also get it over at http://members.chello.at/rescue/Rescue_Release_1.0.rar
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 639 posts since 19 Apr, 2007 from Frankfurt, Germany
-
- KVRAF
- 2665 posts since 11 Jun, 2007
Hehe, yes. And this is an acoustic pop production so no fancy stuff used there. Only the normal things here like eqs, comps, gates, pitch correction thingies (love this elastique pro! very usable), reverbs and such. A chorus or a delay here and there on the a-gits but nothing freaky. On this quad core I finally can just DO what i want. The first few days were like "Oh, how about the CPU?" Now I seldom reach 50% with all that stuff going. Very nice. Best investment for long.bduffy wrote:77 plugins! You're my kind of mixer!![]()
Resetting it all at once? Oh, I didn't mean THAT. I was going through the tracks and deleting the plugs while the seq was running. BTW, is there a good reason to do that? Resetting the mixer all at once?bduffy wrote:Yeah, I can reset the mixer in Cubase, thus deleting all plugins at once. Shouldn't cause a problem. I can test it now coz I'm on my wife's shit computer.
Yeah, it's a SM plugin. I remember that SM plugins are usually slow at load up (or did they fix that?) and that Wavelab problem. I didn't work with SM for long and not since I'm useing Reaper so I dunno if they have serious probs with each other.bduffy wrote:Isn't this plugin made with SynthMaker (IIRC)? I know SM is a little iffy to load, and completely incompatible with some hosts (Wavelab over here), so maybe that's it?
Shogger
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 639 posts since 19 Apr, 2007 from Frankfurt, Germany
The latest SM improves the loading issues a lot, e.g. reducing the loading time around 4x. However it seems there are still some configs/circumstances which could mess up. But as Jens mentioned before, I wouldn't blame solely SM - it's still easy to crash certain hosts with certain other plugin loading/unloading while running.bduffy wrote: Yeah, I can reset the mixer in Cubase, thus deleting all plugins at once. Shouldn't cause a problem. I can test it now coz I'm on my wife's shit computer.
Isn't this plugin made with SynthMaker (IIRC)? I know SM is a little iffy to load, and completely incompatible with some hosts (Wavelab over here), so maybe that's it?
peace
P.S.: Download works again.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Totally OT, but I gotta ask: how do you get that many plugins to run at 50%?? Is that processor power or optimization of effect choices? Just curious, I don't think I can run that many, but I don't get a nice tally like you do w/Reaper (love its CPU/info window).shogger wrote:Hehe, yes. And this is an acoustic pop production so no fancy stuff used there. Only the normal things here like eqs, comps, gates, pitch correction thingies (love this elastique pro! very usable), reverbs and such. A chorus or a delay here and there on the a-gits but nothing freaky. On this quad core I finally can just DO what i want. The first few days were like "Oh, how about the CPU?" Now I seldom reach 50% with all that stuff going. Very nice. Best investment for long.bduffy wrote:77 plugins! You're my kind of mixer!![]()
![]()
Yes: when your mix blows and you want to start over!shogger wrote:Resetting it all at once? Oh, I didn't mean THAT. I was going through the tracks and deleting the plugs while the seq was running. BTW, is there a good reason to do that? Resetting the mixer all at once?bduffy wrote:Yeah, I can reset the mixer in Cubase, thus deleting all plugins at once. Shouldn't cause a problem. I can test it now coz I'm on my wife's shit computer.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
That's right: I remember the last update improved loading times. But I know it works in some hosts better than others, and I assume that could be what shogger was experiencing; but I don't want to blame SM for anything other then being a cool resource that brings us many great things (how's that for kissing ass?).bootsie wrote:The latest SM improves the loading issues a lot, e.g. reducing the loading time around 4x. However it seems there are still some configs/circumstances which could mess up. But as Jens mentioned before, I wouldn't blame solely SM - it's still easy to crash certain hosts with certain other plugin loading/unloading while running.bduffy wrote: Yeah, I can reset the mixer in Cubase, thus deleting all plugins at once. Shouldn't cause a problem. I can test it now coz I'm on my wife's shit computer.
Isn't this plugin made with SynthMaker (IIRC)? I know SM is a little iffy to load, and completely incompatible with some hosts (Wavelab over here), so maybe that's it?
peace
P.S.: Download works again.
-
- KVRAF
- 2665 posts since 11 Jun, 2007
This is no optimized plugin choice. All the stuff I also used on my old and trusty P4 before: Revalver MkII, BReverb, NoNameEQ, ReaComp, ReaPitch, ReaTune, Classic Delay, ...bduffy wrote:Totally OT, but I gotta ask: how do you get that many plugins to run at 50%?? Is that processor power or optimization of effect choices? Just curious, I don't think I can run that many, but I don't get a nice tally like you do w/Reaper (love its CPU/info window).
CPU average is at 40%, highest (rare) peaks are at 50%. Reaper is very optimized for multicore usage. Cool.
Haha, OK. It's quite some time ago that I had to go back to scratch because it was ALL wrong ...bduffy wrote:Yes: when your mix blows and you want to start over!shogger wrote:... BTW, is there a good reason to do that? Resetting the mixer all at once?I see what you mean now. I would normally remove stuff sequentially too.
Sorry for the OT. Now on topic: Is there someone besides me who did an ABX test with this plugin?
Shogger
- KVRAF
- 11369 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
Could somebody please mirror TesslaSE? I'd love to try it!
Cheers!
bManic
Cheers!
bManic
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
- KVRAF
- 11369 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
Not for me it doesn't. 
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
-
- KVRAF
- 2665 posts since 11 Jun, 2007
1kHz sine in,Lagrange wrote:And can that 'someone' please post the test results if possible??
BTW bootsie my panic is over.. I got the plug *wheww..
L
2kHz harmonic appears at -108dB
3kHz harmonic appears at -48dB
5kHz harmonic appears at -86dB
These might not be accurate numbers as several analyzers tell me different things. But these numbers are giving a rough idea of what is going on, distortionwise.
Is that enough for a "blind" test?
Shogger
P.S. bmanic, the manual says that redistribution via download is not allowed. I would have uploaded it for you otherwise.


