KVR Audio

agorka · Post by **agorka** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:20 am

themossinator wrote:Just wanna say this reverb is really really nice, im tending to use it more than the commercial ones ive bought!

Thank you! Very pleased to read this.

Recently I did my best to optimize it, learned SSE3 instructions for that, so there is a new version almost ready that works 10-15% faster, but requires SSE3 instruction set (Pentium4 & later, Intel Atom etc will do, not sure about the others, you can check it with Cpu-Z). I can make it SSE2 compatible, but it will be slower. Does anyone need SSE2 version?
So, while there is some time before new version release, I'd like to ask those who use MoVerb to send me your presets, so I can include them into new version. I encourage you to do so, because you'll have presets you like available in two clicks. =)

By the way, the sound of the upcoming new version isn't changed.

Oleg.

Kemmler · Post by **Kemmler** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:27 pm

pretty good reverb plug here, I managed to make a couple presets for drums and synth: http://drop.io/alkjasdlkjfd/asset/kemml ... resets-zip

hope they are useful to you!

enroe · Post by **enroe** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:32 pm

Thank you, Oleg!

This seems to become one of the best reverbs. Also the GUI is stunning self-explanatory and straightforward. I like it!

s_t · Post by **s_t** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 9:03 am

I really like this reverb, it sounds great.
The only criticism I have comes from the CPU usage, which is higher than with many other reverbs. It seems to me that the Wall EQ is quite cpu heavy, although it makes the reverb sound great. I wonder if it could be optimized even further?

Cheers

A.M. Gold · Post by **A.M. Gold** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 10:22 am

Hey, yea, this one is nice. Thanks very much! Sounds nice and smooth with synthesizers.

agorka · Post by **agorka** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:17 pm

Updated version is available at http://www.rhythm-lab.com/plugins/mo_verb

It requires SSE3 capable processor, includes a few new presets and should be more CPU-effective.

justified · Post by **justified** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:59 pm

agorka wrote:Updated version is available at http://www.rhythm-lab.com/plugins/mo_verb

It requires SSE3 capable processor, includes a few new presets and should be more CPU-effective.

There's no link to new version @ http://www.rhythm-lab.com/plugins/mo_verb to new version, but it can be downloaded by editing the link that points to 1.02

agorka · Post by **agorka** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:25 pm

justified wrote: There's no link to new version @ http://www.rhythm-lab.com/plugins/mo_verb to new version, but it can be downloaded by editing the link that points to 1.02

Sorry for that, now everything is ready, I recommend you to redownload to fix potential bugs and get more presets. =)

justified · Post by **justified** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:30 am

Re-downloaded. Thank you for the great reverb!

agorka · Post by **agorka** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:24 pm

Hello!

We've released another free plug-in - Twin Delay.
You can try it here:
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=3643541

I hope it will be good addition for the Mo' Verb.

Juanjo · Post by **Juanjo** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:49 pm

agorka wrote:Recently I did my best to optimize it, learned SSE3 instructions for that, so there is a new version almost ready that works 10-15% faster, but requires SSE3 instruction set (Pentium4 & later, Intel Atom etc will do, not sure about the others, you can check it with Cpu-Z). I can make it SSE2 compatible, but it will be slower. Does anyone need SSE2 version?

First of all nice reverb with some interesting options, thanks for sharing.
Just a heads up: I've checked the most recent version (1.03) in my puny laptop (Pentium4 Mobile, no SSE3 support) and it actually crashes the host on load... of course I can just use the previous version which works just fine here and forget about further bugfixes or upgrades, but ideally you might want to reimplement sse2 compatibility, or at least fail more gracefully if cpu doesn't support sse3, as I believe that's the case for most/all "pre-Prescott" Pentium4's of which there are still a fair number around... this is actually the first plugin that I know of that NEEDS sse3 to run. Just a thought anyway...

Oh and btw the new delay works and sounds good here as well, very nice job

shanecgriffo · Post by **shanecgriffo** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:56 pm

no sse3 support here but would like a version if at all possible
b.t.w- the new delay is killer, one of the best!

agorka · Post by **agorka** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:02 pm

Juanjo wrote: First of all nice reverb with some interesting options, thanks for sharing.
Just a heads up: I've checked the most recent version (1.03) in my puny laptop (Pentium4 Mobile, no SSE3 support) and it actually crashes the host on load... of course I can just use the previous version which works just fine here and forget about further bugfixes or upgrades, but ideally you might want to reimplement sse2 compatibility, or at least fail more gracefully if cpu doesn't support sse3, as I believe that's the case for most/all "pre-Prescott" Pentium4's of which there are still a fair number around... this is actually the first plugin that I know of that NEEDS sse3 to run. Just a thought anyway...

Oh and btw the new delay works and sounds good here as well, very nice job

Thanks. About sse2 & sse3 support, that was very long way, cause sse2 optimization was, got no idea why, slower than just FPU version of reverb. I can make sse2 version, but I'm not sure if it will be any faster than 1.02. Is there any need of just FPU version, or SSE2 and SSE3 versions would be enough?

Juanjo · Post by **Juanjo** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:19 pm

I believe with sse2/sse3 support you'd be covering basically all systems where it might make any sense to run a modern reverb plugin.

Christian Schüler · Post by **Christian Schüler** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 6:31 pm

Never underestimate the median age of computer systems.

I had to make an SSE-1 compatibility because I was getting complaints from people with Athlon-XP processor. And I think EpicVerb had to react to these complaints too.

New algorithmic Reverb - Mo' Verb