Stop It

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Instruments Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS
OnePingOnly

Post

Look I have never played with VAZ but I would be willing to place money that they use static wave oscillators if they are low cpu.

Post

wagtunes wrote:I'm one of the old guard (began in 1979) that prefers the new stuff. I wish it was around back then. I find it easier to work with. It's more flexible. And in my opinion, it sounds good enough.

Throw is the low cost and the fact that it takes up no space outside of your keyboard and your PC and I will never go back to an analog studio again.
Though I still prefer tubes (I'm a guitarist :shrug: ), I'm with you. My whole "studio" fits on my smallish desk in a corner of my front room. In the end, hardware/software - who cares? Whatever suits, go for it and have fun.
ps I started in '68 (shush!) And I prefer cars to horses... :)

Post

xx JPRacer xx wrote:What a pointless thread...
But fun... bit like football.

edit:
Off to bed now, to dream of a discussion about whether my old WEM Copicat was better my my new(-ish) Satin for echo. :zzz:

Post

Ayorinde wrote:
xx JPRacer xx wrote:What a pointless thread...
But fun... bit like football.
:lol:
Using: Cubase Pro 15, Reason 13, Tascam US-4x4HR, MODX6, DM12D, LaunchKey 49, Yamaha guitar(Pacifica 612v) and bass (BB234) and some virtual instruments and synths.

Post

The only comment I can make is that I've been too busy making music with Diva to notice whether or not it sounds good to someone else. :D

Post

pixel85 wrote:True is that the new guns absolutely doesnt care about it "analog what? wtf is analog?" and old boys are bored to death hearing about another analog/software war... :roll:

So yeah, let's stop it :)
Image

Pffff. Can't stop this.
You have to test yourself every day, gentlemen. Once you stop testin' yourself, you get slow. And when that happens, they kill you.

Post

Teksonik wrote:
Dasheesh wrote:This argument ended ten years + ago.
Yet here you are carrying on that same argument........
Dasheesh wrote:Diva is the closest equivalent sound quality wise that I've heard to hardware. Bazille is the closest feature wise to analog that I've heard. Still, these are not hardware.
And once again the MYTH that hardware is superior to software is perpetuated......
Dasheesh wrote:So Stop.
Yea you should follow your own advice............. :wink:
:lol: Ah, the classic troll. OBVIOUS TROLL IS OBVIOUS. Let me start a thread to end the bickering by fueling up some bickering.
Zerocrossing Media

4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~

Post

:lol: :lol:
Barry
If a billion people believe a stupid thing it is still a stupid thing

Post

inkwarp wrote:meee-ooowwww!
Was that meow analog?

Post

What now we have audibly aliasing cats instead of pics of cats?

Post

Dasheesh wrote:
Hive is different in that it has some real modeling in it. It's a hybrid. That's what sets it apart.
Does Hive "model" anything? Afaik it's doesn't have any real word prototype, it just uses a general concept of VA/Supersaw.
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try

Post

I like turtles.
Music can no longer soothe the worried thoughts of monarchs; it can only tell you when it's time to buy margarine or copulate. -xoxos
Discontinue use if rash or irritation develops.

Post

ccDuckett wrote:I like turtles.
+2

Post

fluffy_little_something wrote:I don't like hardly any emulations. Not because they were inferior, but because I would probably not have been thrilled by the original, either.

Take TAL's U-NO-LX. It sounds pretty good, but as long as Patrick sticks to the original, it only goes so far. He should have invested all that time and energy into turning NoizeMaker - an original TAL concept - into a top-notch synth instead.
On the one hand, you have a top-notch emulation of a well known, beloved hardware synth used on countless productions.

On the other hand, you have yet another 'top-notch' synth with yet another name/GUI.

Guess which one sells better? :wink:

Never forget that those synths aren't produced for fun but for a living.

Post

fischkopf wrote:
Dasheesh wrote:[...]

The better the quality of software the higher the cpu crush. [...]
Oh really?
How do you explain synths like Audjoo Helix then? That thing sounds incredibly analog and uses very little CPU.
Helix may sound incredibly analog (whatever that means), but it surely does not play in the same league as Diva.

Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”