Pulsar 900 Series

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Instruments Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS 900 Series Modular Synthesizer

Post

Timfonie wrote::roll: Beware, this totally looks like a scam. Dummy text everywhere, no information given at all and the only thing which works is the payment function.
The sound demo's are probably recordings of real machines.

Also: put the address (Red Hill Ave 22, Orange County) in a search machine and you will find lots of suspicious 'companies' at that address all with the same telephone number.

The new Softube Modular now that one is real. :tu:
Tut tut... This is a real synth.
I will take the Lord's name in vain, whenever I want. Hail Satan! And his little goblins too. :lol:
Top

Post

I've been watching the GS thread for a while now. I think it sounds cool. I would have bought this already, but I'm waiting for a 10.9 version, I don't want to upgrade my mac just yet.

Apparently, he's going to do a roll back (if it's feasible he was saying).

But I will get it at some point either way. :)
I will take the Lord's name in vain, whenever I want. Hail Satan! And his little goblins too. :lol:
Top

Post

It's available then now?
Top

Post

aMUSEd wrote:It's available then now?
Sure is! But if your on mac you got to be on El Capitan (afaik). I can't even install the demo (I'm on 10.9.5).
I will take the Lord's name in vain, whenever I want. Hail Satan! And his little goblins too. :lol:
Top

Post

Robmobius wrote:
aMUSEd wrote:It's available then now?
Sure is! But if your on mac you got to be on El Capitan (afaik). I can't even install the demo (I'm on 10.9.5).
Oh crap - guess he's using Metal.
Top

Post

He is.
Top

Post

Interesting that the Moog iOS one is too.
Top

Post

I've discovered this synth today, I'm really impressed, according to the demo I've heard on the net, it sounds better to my ears than the moog app, softube modular, or even the last reaktor modules...
Is it planned to make a win version ? :cry: :cry:

On your website :
The innovative hardware accelerated user interface allows for arbitrary panning and zooming within the virtual rack, while interacting with controls. It is rendered at a high frame rate to ensure immediate feedback and smooth operation.
Do you need some specific mac tools to get the gui running ? Personally, I don't care about the realistic / fast responding gui... But that sound, damn...
Top

Post

Tchandra wrote:I've discovered this synth today, I'm really impressed, according to the demo I've heard on the net, it sounds better to my ears than the moog app, softube modular, or even the last reaktor modules...
Is it planned to make a win version ? :cry: :cry:
Glad to hear you like the sound!

Yes that is my intention, with the caveat that I first need to establish a Mac user base. There are plans for updates and ideas for a related product that are more incremental in effort. A Windows port will be a big project so it's further down the list.
On your website :
The innovative hardware accelerated user interface allows for arbitrary panning and zooming within the virtual rack, while interacting with controls. It is rendered at a high frame rate to ensure immediate feedback and smooth operation.
Do you need some specific mac tools to get the gui running ? Personally, I don't care about the realistic / fast responding gui... But that sound, damn...
To me the user interface is almost as important as sound, and I'm certainly not the only one who cares a great deal about that. I spent years working on a big CAD application and a large canvas with pan & zoom and fast, smooth response is exactly what I wanted for a modular plug in. :D
Top

Post

Thank you for your answer :)
pulsarmodular wrote:Yes that is my intention, with the caveat that I first need to establish a Mac user base. There are plans for updates and ideas for a related product that are more incremental in effort. A Windows port will be a big project so it's further down the list.
I am glad to learn you plan to develop a windows version :party:
But I am afraid it won't be affordable soon...
Whatever, I hope you will get a commercial success with your projects, it sounds promising :)

pulsarmodular wrote:To me the user interface is almost as important as sound, and I'm certainly not the only one who cares a great deal about that. I spent years working on a big CAD application and a large canvas with pan & zoom and fast, smooth response is exactly what I wanted for a modular plug in. :D
I see what you mean... I have tried audulus 3 recently and it works that way, you can zoom in and out and focus on the area of the patch you're working on, it looks classy and it is an efficient design for a modular software (I mean you don' need that for an EQ).
But my question was, I thought you were using some graphic libraries from mac and that was the reason why there was no windows version, but it does not seem to be the case.
The downside of such a gui is that it requires more CPU than standard plugins no ? Personnaly I don't have a GPU, my i5 features one which is powerful enough for most cases. But mac generally have some good GPU, so maybe that's also a good reason to develop on mac first (???)
Last edited by Tchandra on Sat May 14, 2016 8:49 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Top

Post

oops
Top

Post

not seen here by Studio One v2 or Numerology 4
macbook pro
OSX 10.11.4

dave
Top

Post

dave dove wrote:not seen here by Studio One v2 or Numerology 4
macbook pro
OSX 10.11.4

dave
It cannot run in a sandboxed environment...yet. Could be that.
Top

Post

Jim @ Five12 confirmed that P900 loads fine in the latest Numerology build (N4 4.2 Build 166) on 10.11: http://www.five12.net/showthread.php?t=3280
Top

Post

@Pulsarmodular. Do you have a general time table for Windows? Are we looking at a year, two years? Just so I have a general idea.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”