- evaluating music...xoxos wrote:soz to counter,
imo duke in the 30's is about as advanced as humanity gets. "sugar" is very pop, but compared to other renditions it is miles ahead.
The record ... my experience specifically.. .
The second spin I gave it, I appreciated her vocal a lot.
I remember well being 16 and high on reefer getting gassed by 20s and 30s Ellington and Cab Calloway.
The more I focused on the language technically the less I wanted to hear of instrumentalists soloing on them simple chords.
Ultimately it became a dichotomy of art vs popular entertainment, intellect vs sex emphasis.
It is unfair, and I wouldn't write it up on such a basis today* because it's not necessarily a necessary dichotomy (redundancy deliberate) and I would have to eliminate all of jazz up to a certain point. Seems half or more of jazz happened before people could even sell a record that didn't engage the public via a dance hall ticket first/foremost.
(*: I mean that's just to trace my aesthetic to its basis.)
I've been through a lot of those solos anyway, so 'intrigue' is not real likely. I have been a little surprised by some Charlie Parker in the past week, which I would not be able to pin down easily as to why. I grew up with things like that B side to The Peanut Vendor and the vast majority of what my father bought was post-WWII and little of it escaped bebop and its deliberate advance of Tin Pan Alley/Broadway changes.
He was born same yr as Miles Davis and the same anti-cornball attitude pretty much prevailed, permeated the era.