Well, musical influences cumulate. I might hear today something which sounds very fresh and suddenly I'm all influenced by it. But if I keep on composing for years to come, certainly some influences remain for longer periods of time. That is, apart from all these daily influences that might, in a sense, flutter, I can hopefully pinpoint some influences that have influenced my output deeper, the very groundwork of my technique.pHz wrote:music (and all art) is about reflecting and/or recalling a particular emotion at a particular moment then yes it IS surely ???visa tapani wrote:Asking about musical influences does not really ask about one's current feelings / emotions, no?
And these influences do not, should not and cannot change on a day-to-day basis. And usually when asked for musical influences, the enquirer is referring to influences of this particular type, not the sort of momentary influences that might be altogether different on a different istance.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say, but let me elucidate my point: It will doubtlessly remain as a fact that at the moment of writing that particular song, I was influenced by the whatever song it was. This will never change.pHz wrote:surely not ... it would still depend on your mood at the moment you try to write that track as to whether you were able to 'correctly' interpret the intention of your influence or not ...visa tapani wrote:For instance, if a song directly influences me to try to write a similar song, this influence would remain as a fact no matter how I'd feel after a year or what type of music I'd be producing at the time.
Read the first 2 paragraphs of this post. I'm making the rather sound assertion here that any reasonable succesfull artist (or a musical project - an artist might have a wide range of influences, but it is then commonplace to divide these to different projects) will develop some kind of boundaries between which he/she/it operates. An artist will probably have momentary sources of inspiration, but these are imo too evanescent to be called significant influences.why ever not ??? ...visa tapani wrote:But if you have been writing music for any lenght of time and/or if you have formed what might be called 'your sound', the influences shouldn't flutter wildly on a day to day basis.
To no extent. Let's entertain ourselves with a hypothetical example.... surely if the SAME things influence you ALL the time then you are nothing more than stuck in a rut to some extent ???
As a young child, I saw an old blues-pa playing around my neighborhood and was deeply affected by his music. I was impressed by the expressive power of blues and thus immersed myself in the study of it for decades to come. I would become a blues musician. I could and should list this old man as an influence pretty much for the rest of my life. Now, how would this influence encumber or chain me?
Then it seems you haven't developed a "your sound".what if 'my' sound is based on the concept of continually shifting points of reference ??? ...
Oh, and please edit your post - those quotes are a nauseating mess
