Wasn't he the dude that thought he had implied, THIS:ROTMetro wrote: Wed Aug 27, 2025 10:10 pm Bro just discovered advertising and things he's on to something.
with THIS:
to them:
Wasn't he the dude that thought he had implied, THIS:ROTMetro wrote: Wed Aug 27, 2025 10:10 pm Bro just discovered advertising and things he's on to something.
plugs in that run on the new cpu are very 2025 please make tube compressor that cannot quite run on the fastest pc mac new cpu. User can only hear every 5 seconds through drop out pure tube quality. Marketing say in 2027 you have something for looking forwards, most accurate emulation using highest cpu use possible. Price $149. the new mode of the plug in company.This one is really itdkode80 wrote: Wed Aug 27, 2025 2:05 pm I will say its tempting as a new plugin developer to try to latch on and emulate vintage hardware but I'm not sure how much more I should contribute to the issue![]()
Yep. Substituting "we" for "I" to give arguments that larger than life feel ....Old Norse wrote: Mon Aug 25, 2025 10:22 amHow can you possibly know this?Starbright wrote: Mon Aug 25, 2025 8:59 am And in the end 9/10 times most of us use for mixing our stock tools [...]
Most of the crap he's getting isn't about the rant itself, but because he thinks this very common and well accepted rant is somehow controversial.ampetrosillo wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 10:19 am Lads, is one no longer entitled to a rant? Come on. Of course the OP knows he won't change anything with this post, it's called a "big fat controversial take". And anyway it is the usual overproduction problem in capitalist societies. If all that effort (not big, since it's low-hanging fruit, but still) were dedicated to something more useful, we might have it, but people brush things off and call it "the market". It is objectively an inefficient way to do things. It's not necessarily the worst. I'm not advocating for central planning or whatever, but if you can't even complain about it...
No, no one is 'entitled' to other peoples' attention. Why do people keep thinking that? You can rant that 'the end is coming' but no one has to entertain it, and people can and should call you out for it.ampetrosillo wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 10:19 am Lads, is one no longer entitled to a rant? Come on. Of course the OP knows he won't change anything with this post, it's called a "big fat controversial take". And anyway it is the usual overproduction problem in capitalist societies. If all that effort (not big, since it's low-hanging fruit, but still) were dedicated to something more useful, we might have it, but people brush things off and call it "the market". It is objectively an inefficient way to do things. It's not necessarily the worst. I'm not advocating for central planning or whatever, but if you can't even complain about it...
zerocrossing wrote: Fri Aug 29, 2025 4:46 am
For saturators I bought Waves' BB Tubes, because I like Aliasing a lot. Mostly a work flow thing.
Thus the troll got blocked. (at 8x there is no audible aliasing on BB Tubes)El°HYM wrote: Sun Aug 31, 2025 8:16 amzerocrossing wrote: Fri Aug 29, 2025 4:46 am
For saturators I bought Waves' BB Tubes, because I like Aliasing a lot. Mostly a work flow thing.
![]()
Loving the clarity of purpose here. Personally I feel like emulation developers need to get into fashion and atmospherics - why not capture the authentic analog vibe with a virtual 1983 Armani blazer or some emulated ozone-depleting hairspray?jamcat wrote: Wed Aug 27, 2025 3:23 am So I only use modeled hardware. I want my music to sound like it could have come out of a studio in the '80s. I want to use the same sort of signal path and make the same sort of mixing moves for the same reasons. I want the limitations and idiosyncrasies of the gear that made those albums what they were. For me, making music is like a historical reenactment. It's why I do it. And it beats pretend dying in the mud on a civil war battlefield.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026