KVR Audio

TVD · Post by **TVD** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 8:39 pm

mauseoleum wrote:Is it really really true that Mike Oldfield is doing album with FLS?

Yes. Check it out:

http://www.e-officedirect.com/FLStudio/ ... rames.html

deep.noise · Post by **deep.noise** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 8:53 pm

Mystical_Fantasy wrote: it's still not professional software

it's your opinion...

the music you compose can be 'pro' or not 'pro', not
the software you use to make it
there are greats tunes made with trackers...and horrible songs made with cubase or protools...

...and i hate the word 'professional'

peace

TVD · Post by **TVD** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 8:56 pm

deep.noise wrote:
Mystical_Fantasy wrote: it's still not professional software
it's your opinion...

the music you compose can be 'pro' or not 'pro', not
the software you use to make it
there are greats tunes made with trackers...and horrible songs made with cubase or protools...

...and i hate the word 'professional'

peace

You should hate the word "workflow".

That has been the most offer used word of the month!

deep.noise · Post by **deep.noise** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 8:59 pm

TonyVanDam wrote: You should hate the word "workflow".
That has been the most offer used word of the month!

Carbonboy · Post by **Carbonboy** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 9:31 pm

jardim do mar wrote:I do understand how "you" feel ,,,,but,,,
many people who do experience problems and are willing to pay "someone" to fix those problems ASAP.

What? I thought the original post was asking if FL was the only app you needed to creat/make music...not run a commercial studio.

Carb.

Carbonboy · Post by **Carbonboy** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 9:37 pm

Mystical_Fantasy wrote:However the bottom line is that to compare Fruity to the professionl software packages such as Cubase, Sonar, Logic, etc. is really not fair. Fruity is out of it's league when being compared to these professional software packages because it isn't one nor can it do everything that these other packages can.

What crock. Please tell me what makes these packages "professional"?

Carb

tony tony chopper · Post by **tony tony chopper** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 10:02 pm

CD burning is useful in an application that allows you to manually adjust PQ points etc, which professional audio softeware like Audition and WaveLab let you do.

FL's rendered waves contain the playlist markers - you just need to use those markers when you burn to CD. There's a special type of cue points made for that.
IMO it's often the toyish apps that want (for marketing reasons) to have everything included.

CD ripping means importing audio directly FROM a CD.

If you're a professional, you don't rip from CD's, you get the original audio material in the first place. What's on CD's is the end-user version, and you work with that only when you don't have the choice, that is, when you're stealing someone else's stuff (otherwise you'd get the original material, usually at a higher depth & samplerate, so that you can master it further).

headquest · Post by **headquest** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 10:11 pm

gol wrote: IMO it's often the toyish apps that want (for marketing reasons) to have everything included.

I don't agree that Audition or WaveLab are "toyish". But thanks for the tip about how FL does this.

If you're a professional, you don't rip from CD's, you get the original audio material in the first place. What's on CD's is the end-user version, and you work with that only when you don't have the choice, that is, when you're stealing someone else's stuff (otherwise you'd get the original material, usually at a higher depth & samplerate, so that you can master it further).

Very true...

...but in education (my main emplyment - I teach keyboards and Music Tech) it is very useful to be able to rip a track from a CD and transpose it to another key (e.g. using pitchshifting) so that it is easier for students to play along with.

Sicklecell666 · Post by **Sicklecell666** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 10:13 pm

gol, since you are making suggestions, what applications handle LAME mp3 encoding?

Carbonboy · Post by **Carbonboy** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 10:13 pm

Sicklecell666 wrote:gol, since you are making suggestions, what applications handle LAME mp3 encoding?

www.goldwave.com

Carbonboy · Post by **Carbonboy** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 10:16 pm

headquest wrote:Very true...

...but in education (my main emplyment - I teach keyboards and Music Tech) it is very useful to be able to rip a track from a CD and transpose it to another key (e.g. using pitchshifting) so that it is easier for students to play along with.

So what's hard? You rip the track to WAV in any number of free programs, dump the WAV in FL Studio 5 and then pitch-shift it.

Carb.

sailorboy · Post by **sailorboy** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 10:17 pm

freeze function is the only thing i hope from fls.
i guess thats the diferent with sx or logic,
automation is wonderfull on fls , vsti's support,
i guess if you need to record real instrument you do it in some free audio records , then , export sample to fls ant thats all.
freeze function and the world become frutita

Carbonboy · Post by **Carbonboy** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 10:22 pm

sailorboy wrote:freeze function is the only thing i hope from fls.
i guess thats the diferent with sx or logic,
automation is wonderfull on fls , vsti's support,
i guess if you need to record real instrument you do it in some free audio records , then , export sample to fls ant thats all.
freeze function and the world become frutita

You can freeze a mixer track now...and record audio in FL right now, what are saying?

Carb.

tony tony chopper · Post by **tony tony chopper** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 10:26 pm

I don't agree that Audition or WaveLab are "toyish".

They're not toyish, because it's their job to let you work on audio files, import, export, and edit. It'd be toyish for a *sequencer* to burn to CD. The same way it'd be toyish for an audio editor to let you compose - it wouldn't do it as well as a sequencer anyway.

gol, since you are making suggestions, what applications handle LAME mp3 encoding?

http://lame.sourceforge.net/

sailorboy · Post by **sailorboy** » Wed Nov 24, 2004 10:26 pm

Carbonboy wrote:
sailorboy wrote:freeze function is the only thing i hope from fls.
i guess thats the diferent with sx or logic,
automation is wonderfull on fls , vsti's support,
i guess if you need to record real instrument you do it in some free audio records , then , export sample to fls ant thats all.
freeze function and the world become frutita

You can freeze a mixer track now...and record audio in FL right now, what are saying?

Carb.

sorry, you mean fls5?
i'm talking frezze a track and have the possibilitie to go back.
i don't have fls5

KVR Audio

Can FLS 5 help us get by without Pro-Tools or Audition??????

Do you like FLS 5 so far?