Old Free VSTi Gems From The Past

[eidenk]

Thanks guys for the uploads

I definitely picked bitch2 on an old xoxos page at the wayback pinkjimi. I also found a few other of his I do not have on the links you posted lately.

Also found some stuff I don't have I think in pinkjimi's old HD listing in this thread.

I'll be updating both lists I have made soon I hope.

[eidenk]

In case you've missed that, I did, plenty (something like 300 or 400 ) of mac pluggos ported to windows here :

http://rapidshare.com/files/88364390/O-lleg.zip.html

For more info about it see this thread :

http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... sc&start=0

[MaxSynths]

1: a true stereo flanger that can start the sweep with every attack; if you play legatto [...] it would flange regularly, but each time you picked...err....attacked it it would start the sweep of the flange again, all the while still at whatever rate ya set the lfo to...

...do you mean that when you start a new phrase after a pause the flanger reset to the "start point" (in order to avoid a strange behaviour at the attack)??

...anyway forget the zero latency feature

[Dean Aka Nekro]

Yes MaxSynths friend he means when playing hammer ons and hammer offs, slides, bends and anything else which does not require the string to be struck with the plectrum for each indivdual note played, and then when the pick hits the string it instantly retriggers from the start again. Its a cool idea jimi and should be do-able quite easily with an ?envolope follower with a sensitivity control? (Not a dev here whatsoever!) and then the phase/flanger effect (and a developers touch/skills) following and being controlled by that? just like the way auto-wah/touch-wah type filter pedals work and i guess they would be termed/called 'dynamic flanger' and 'dynamic phaser' since they would be controlled by a guitarist's playing/picking dynamics

Nekro/Dean

[RunBeerRun]

Interesting ideas, sounds like you'd need to know envelope retriggering, I don't know how that is done.

I use hardware for phaser/flanger, never liked any software.

[Dean Aka Nekro]

Interesting ideas, sounds like you'd need to know envelope retriggering, I don't know how that is done.

I use hardware for phaser/flanger, never liked any software.

I never really use modulation, the only modulation i do use is TAL Chorus 60 as its not too OTT RunBeerRun although i have shit loads of soft and hard ware to choose from. However im game for trying something like that out on my guitar (i leave the flanging/phasing to EVH as he is master of that stuff along with hendrix and his leslie's and univox thing) - it sounds too cheese in metal but i would/do use modulation in electronic type stuff i do with a friend

Nekro/Dean

[Dean Aka Nekro]

In case you've missed that, I did, plenty (something like 300 or 400 ) of mac pluggos ported to windows here :

http://rapidshare.com/files/88364390/O-lleg.zip.html

For more info about it see this thread :

http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... sc&start=0

Nice one eidenk, i have and use quite a few pluggo's (free and payware) but dont get time to route for them. That pack is going to be a treat man

Nekro/Dean

[pinkjimiphoton]

1: a true stereo flanger that can start the sweep with every attack; if you play legatto [...] it would flange regularly, but each time you picked...err....attacked it it would start the sweep of the flange again, all the while still at whatever rate ya set the lfo to...

...do you mean that when you start a new phrase after a pause the flanger reset to the "start point" (in order to avoid a strange behaviour at the attack)??

...anyway forget the zero latency feature

exactly, max, so that every time you start a new phrase, the flange cycle would begin anew!!

no zero latency?@?@??!?!?!?

ya mean ya can't make it work in real time???!?!?!?



hell, if i could get my latency with a soft synth down to the 8-24 ms my guitar synth seems to take, i'd be lovin' life!!

but i realize it is impossible.

[pinkjimiphoton]

Yes MaxSynths friend he means when playing hammer ons and hammer offs, slides, bends and anything else which does not require the string to be struck with the plectrum for each indivdual note played, and then when the pick hits the string it instantly retriggers from the start again. Its a cool idea jimi and should be do-able quite easily with an ?envolope follower with a sensitivity control? (Not a dev here whatsoever!) and then the phase/flanger effect (and a developers touch/skills) following and being controlled by that? just like the way auto-wah/touch-wah type filter pedals work and i guess they would be termed/called 'dynamic flanger' and 'dynamic phaser' since they would be controlled by a guitarist's playing/picking dynamics

Nekro/Dean

exactly bro!

the autowah idea would be similar, but in it's case would use the compression to slowly sweep the wah open, and the wah effect would do the same dynamic thing as the flange/phaser.

even better if they had some kinda control where ya could vary the stereo width like the brainworx pluggie ya hipped me to, and make the sweeps flange in opposite directions in the stereo field.


a boy can dream...lol

[pinkjimiphoton]

Interesting ideas, sounds like you'd need to know envelope retriggering, I don't know how that is done.

I use hardware for phaser/flanger, never liked any software.

i have a few hardware flangers and phasers, but all my recorded stuff is the clasic seried flanger or phaser from kjaerhaus..

i can get close with those if i jump thru enough hoops, like split stereo tracks to mono and reverse one side and flange the piss out of it before reversing it again, and then flanging the other side at almost the exact same rate (check out my song requiem to hear what it sounds like)but that doesn;t retrigger like in my dreams of sound waves flying thru my chromostones, lol,

i really think being able to retrigger shit like that would make both of these effects far more expressive.

i seem to remember having a weird hardware flanger about 25 years ago that did this, but feck me if i can remember...

i would love to make my guitar sound like rick wakeman's arp and moog filter sweeps...

[pinkjimiphoton]

Interesting ideas, sounds like you'd need to know envelope retriggering, I don't know how that is done.

I use hardware for phaser/flanger, never liked any software.

I never really use modulation, the only modulation i do use is TAL Chorus 60 as its not too OTT RunBeerRun although i have shit loads of soft and hard ware to choose from. However im game for trying something like that out on my guitar (i leave the flanging/phasing to EVH as he is master of that stuff along with hendrix and his leslie's and univox thing) - it sounds too cheese in metal but i would/do use modulation in electronic type stuff i do with a friend

Nekro/Dean

i never use chorusing, to me it just makes shit sound too generic, i haven;t liked any chorusing since my old electro harmonix clone theory which was a weird but cool pedal; the reissues SUCK DUBYA BALLS...and i can;t find the right old one, and when i do find them, folks want enough to buy a damn space shuttle.

but phasing i do find to work well on more metalic stuff, not that cheezy sweepy bullshit 70's sound, but that classic ass acid tone a phaser can impart on a lead guitar, where it literally becomes chewy and 3d, lol...

serious,try a phaser on a lead sometime, ya may diggit.

[Dean Aka Nekro]

Yeah some Mid/Side tom foolery would be awesome jimi, i do think that it is possible - check out a guitar effect unit which you control with a big gay ring on your finger called the 'WAG' as that does some crazy shit depending on how you play dynamicly and what you do with the ring finger, i tried one and it was fun *EXCEPT IT MAKES YA LOOK LIKE A COMPLETE WANKER* - good idea badly implemented

Dean

[Dean Aka Nekro]

Interesting ideas, sounds like you'd need to know envelope retriggering, I don't know how that is done.

I use hardware for phaser/flanger, never liked any software.

I never really use modulation, the only modulation i do use is TAL Chorus 60 as its not too OTT RunBeerRun although i have shit loads of soft and hard ware to choose from. However im game for trying something like that out on my guitar (i leave the flanging/phasing to EVH as he is master of that stuff along with hendrix and his leslie's and univox thing) - it sounds too cheese in metal but i would/do use modulation in electronic type stuff i do with a friend

Nekro/Dean

i never use chorusing, to me it just makes shit sound too generic, i haven;t liked any chorusing since my old electro harmonix clone theory which was a weird but cool pedal; the reissues SUCK DUBYA BALLS...and i can;t find the right old one, and when i do find them, folks want enough to buy a damn space shuttle.

but phasing i do find to work well on more metalic stuff, not that cheezy sweepy bullshit 70's sound, but that classic ass acid tone a phaser can impart on a lead guitar, where it literally becomes chewy and 3d, lol...

serious,try a phaser on a lead sometime, ya may diggit.

I will do mate, as i said i got a ton of choices - the best for a rotten metallic wierd not typical phase type sound i have is an Ibanez Tonelok series pedal - you can get them for like £10 - £15 jimi. If you see one going cheap i think you would like it *but it wont be a replacement for your original EH pedal though mate*

All ze best

Nekro Mullet

[pinkjimiphoton]

dude, try that kjaerhaus at a real slow speed sometime, and split the track like i explained, ya feel like shit is buzzing thru your brain if ya wear cans..
lol,

i always liked phasers more than flangers, guess i am weird!

i've tried the tone lock pedal, but couln't seem to get the subtle effect i was looking for..

like...

i'm looking more for the effect to f**k with the listener's head than be an obvious effect.

guys like us will hear it, and notice it, but the ordinairy bloke won't. to him it (hopefully) will just sound "cool", ya know?

nekro mullet...lmao

ain't a mullet just a reversed mohawk?

[Dean Aka Nekro]

ok i will give the Classic Phaser with Mid/Side processing at the same time a go. Yes them tonelok series are not subtle one little bit guess thats why they go for peanuts. I like keeping the mid/sum clean and effecting the side/difference so it could work really well and be subtle also if i dont go 200% wide on the Stereo signal but i might do it for fun when f**king around.

Yeah la mullae is sort of a bastard child of a mohawk, a rat tail and an undercut all rolled into one lmao

Check this beuty out i found (also notice the guy to the mullets left with the worst pair of shorts i have ever seen - too funny jimi :



Dean