The All In One Source Bitwig Information & Speculation Thread
- KVRAF
- 2562 posts since 1 Oct, 2013
You may be able to find a random midi generator plug as well. Some freeware tools or some stuff that may be even more powerful. Thomas seems to know about that stuff.sonicpowa wrote:"a built-in spectrum analyzer "?
Voxengo SPAN is great and free, the development time should be used for other things IMO.
- KVRAF
- 2562 posts since 1 Oct, 2013
I dunno if voting really helps anything. If they do a decent job of following user opinion they will know what people want most. Having a voting system can make things confusing sometimes because people might imagine features in different ways but you can only vote for the way that it has been described already. And the Bitwigs need to reserve the right to implement their own versions of what people ask for or not implement stuff at all if it will conflict with the paradigm. I think Reaper has shown that if people are invited into the process they will simply ask for everything. Reaper is having problems incorporating everything people want and keeping it simple. And Reaper is sort of made as the roll your own daw; in Bitwig it is even more important to keep things sleek because it intends to be a more straightforward and intuitive working environment. The Reaper devs don't seem to follow the most voted for features that faithfully anyway, last time I checked there was still some high level stuff that they had not bothered with for one reason or another.
- KVRAF
- 2562 posts since 1 Oct, 2013
Reaper also has this issue where it is driven by forum geeks, not that I have a problem with being a forum geek, hehe. It's just that since the forum is where all the thinking and voting goes on the needs of people who will hang around a forum and vote on a bunch of FRs are over-represented. This could be part of the reason that Reaper lacks polish; the non geek types are not there to push for everything being smoothed out. In fact the non-geeks are probably staying away from Reaper in the first place.
- KVRAF
- 5948 posts since 19 Jun, 2008 from Melbourne, Australia
Voting is useful to get an general idea of what users want, but not when selecting specific features. The final design decisions are best left to the developers (of any software or product, not just Bitwig)
... space is the place ...
- KVRist
- 384 posts since 7 Nov, 2013
I'm fully aware of the fact that there are a lot of free spectrum analyzers and MIDI generators around - on the other side, so are also a lot of free reverbs, delays, samplers and EQs, still there are such devices in Bitwig.Ogopogo wrote:You may be able to find a random midi generator plug as well. Some freeware tools or some stuff that may be even more powerful. Thomas seems to know about that stuff.sonicpowa wrote:"a built-in spectrum analyzer "?
Voxengo SPAN is great and free, the development time should be used for other things IMO.
The point is, i like to work as much "in the box" as possible. Integrated plugins usually are much faster, lighter on the CPU, don't require addtional space as they live inside the device lane and, last but not least, look A LOT better as they share the same GUI.
I'm pretty sure these are not very high on the list for planned features and it's no dealbreaker in any way for me but i hope they will be implemented some time in the future.
We all have features we'd like to see and are important to the way we work. Some want to see comping as soon as possible, others need a MIDI to audio function and everyone else want it to go on sale for 99 bucks. Some is realistic, some is not...
Everyone wants cats, though - the one thing we can all agree on.
- KVRAF
- 5948 posts since 19 Jun, 2008 from Melbourne, Australia
Not to dismiss your needs, but I think most users of any host would agree that effects such as reverb, delay, compression take precedence over a visual spectrum analyser. Less urgent features will likely be implemented in a future update (as already discussed many times).
... space is the place ...
- KVRAF
- 6539 posts since 9 Dec, 2008 from Berlin
I can see more modulation and midi tools in BWS future too.
But I'd say let them release it as it is, have them go through the initial storm that will follow and I'm sure after that has settled, they are very eager to implement a lot of cool stuff.
As for Random Midi, I found the Pizmidi Tools pretty good.
I tried to create my own midi tool in Reaktor but it's way too heavy for such a simple task, so in the end I either need go get into VST coding myself or wait for the BWS SDK/v2.
Although I also have high hopes for the Loomer - non-Epoch plugin which seems the über-midi tool from what was shown so far. And Loomer is as cross Plattform as BWS...
Hopefully I will live to see it
Cheers,
Tom
But I'd say let them release it as it is, have them go through the initial storm that will follow and I'm sure after that has settled, they are very eager to implement a lot of cool stuff.
As for Random Midi, I found the Pizmidi Tools pretty good.
I tried to create my own midi tool in Reaktor but it's way too heavy for such a simple task, so in the end I either need go get into VST coding myself or wait for the BWS SDK/v2.
Although I also have high hopes for the Loomer - non-Epoch plugin which seems the über-midi tool from what was shown so far. And Loomer is as cross Plattform as BWS...
Hopefully I will live to see it
Cheers,
Tom
"Out beyond the ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoing, there is a field. I’ll meet you there." · Rumi
UrbanFlow.art · Instagram · YouTube
UrbanFlow.art · Instagram · YouTube
- KVRAF
- 2562 posts since 1 Oct, 2013
Yeah, I can relate. There are plenty of granular synths out there but I think I'd like one integrated in Bitwig. It would fit in the device lane, be easier to use the mod system with, and maybe browse presets with. Plus I wouldn't have to pay extra for it...Redukt wrote:I'm fully aware of the fact that there are a lot of free spectrum analyzers and MIDI generators around - on the other side, so are also a lot of free reverbs, delays, samplers and EQs, still there are such devices in Bitwig.
The point is, i like to work as much "in the box" as possible. Integrated plugins usually are much faster, lighter on the CPU, don't require addtional space as they live inside the device lane and, last but not least, look A LOT better as they share the same GUI.
I'm pretty sure these are not very high on the list for planned features and it's no dealbreaker in any way for me but i hope they will be implemented some time in the future.
We all have features we'd like to see and are important to the way we work. Some want to see comping as soon as possible, others need a MIDI to audio function and everyone else want it to go on sale for 99 bucks. Some is realistic, some is not...
Everyone wants cats, though - the one thing we can all agree on.
-
- KVRer
- 12 posts since 19 Dec, 2013 from Los Angeles, CA
I don't think the daw scene is missing inspiring tools. Ableton is quite good at what it does. The daw scene is missing an integrated platform that has all the electronic music friendly tools Ableton has (and more) while also having the essential tools of the classic daws. From what I have seen, BitWig is off to a great start, but I hope for getting the essential daw tools in place quickly. Comping is essential to me because even though I make regimented "commercial" electronic music, I play every part into the sequencer with a keyboard and I do it using 20 takes until I settle on a pattern I like. That is inspired music creation to me.dom@bitwig wrote:
As 1.0 is obviously more focussed on being an inspiring music creation tool, which i think the DAW scene is lacking more than editing DAWs, i think this decision was totally ok. Protools, Cubase and the likes are around for ages and do a great job when it comes to recording and editing. No need to reinvent the wheel in that department...
Cheers,
Dom