It is here:masterhiggins wrote:You can usually get it secondhand for a lot cheaper. If it were priced the same as uno-lx I'd say it's a no-brainer.
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6503529
It is here:masterhiggins wrote:You can usually get it secondhand for a lot cheaper. If it were priced the same as uno-lx I'd say it's a no-brainer.
Pardon me, but I'm confused. With all that you listed, you would still take TAL over it?masterhiggins wrote:Subject: AAS Ultra Analog VA-2
Regarding flexibility and variety it's much better than uno-lx. However, without fx, tal has a much better raw sound. It sounds more convincing to me.Aryaroman wrote:Better investment than TAL Uno-LX V2 in terms of variety and flexibility?Michael L wrote:Visit the website and check out the factory and soundbank demos. It has a lot of range, and way underrated IMHO; e.g. AAS packed 330 automatable parameters into all those tabs and menus.
UA2 has a larger variety of envelope, filter, and resonance modes. Plus you can route oscillators through different filters, utilize up to 4 voices for unison, etc. there are a lot more differences but that's what sticks out at the top of my head. The arpeggiator is also decent. I personally don't think it's worth $99, though. You can usually get it secondhand for a lot cheaper. If it were priced the same as uno-lx I'd say it's a no-brainer. Sadly, it is not.
Alright. I think I'll get VA-2 and Uno LX later. Cheers.masterhiggins wrote:If they were the same price, I'd take VA-2. At the current price I'd rather buy synthmaster or ACE.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026