Just tried it out, the filters have nice slope and sound to them.
My question is however, what's the difference from this synth compared to example ZebraCM?
Also, will there be presets with the done synth, and if so, where do i send it
Psssst Urs is working on a free synth
-
- KVRist
- 54 posts since 20 Oct, 2010
I like the sound of it!
Just tried it out, the filters have nice slope and sound to them.
My question is however, what's the difference from this synth compared to example ZebraCM?
Also, will there be presets with the done synth, and if so, where do i send it
Just tried it out, the filters have nice slope and sound to them.
My question is however, what's the difference from this synth compared to example ZebraCM?
Also, will there be presets with the done synth, and if so, where do i send it
-
- u-he
- 30193 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Thank you!Iamnevyn wrote:I like the sound of it!
Just tried it out, the filters have nice slope and sound to them.
ZebraCM sounds like Zebra and is a bit on the digital side. TyrellN6 sounds more like a certain bunch of analogue synths. TyrellN6 uses much more cpu than ZebraCM for similar sounds.My question is however, what's the difference from this synth compared to example ZebraCM?
Presets can be contributed for the factory if sent to urs@u-he.com - which would be very appreciated. Deadline is April 2nd.Also, will there be presets with the done synth, and if so, where do i send it
-
- KVRist
- 284 posts since 28 Feb, 2004 from An old town in Central German Uplands
Unfortunately TYRELL doesn't show up in VST-Host (Unhandled exeption failure)...
(P4, 32-bit, Win XP, SP2)
ciao
armin
(P4, 32-bit, Win XP, SP2)
ciao
armin
-
- KVRAF
- 3817 posts since 8 Mar, 2006
Yep, there was, and now it seems to be gone from the list.. but usable?hakey wrote:Did the older version have Pan as a Matrix Target, or is that a figment of my imagination?
For exemple I've made a patch a while back using the "VCA1:Pan" and it's still saved with the patch, but I just can't find it in the list anymore.
-
- KVRAF
- 2707 posts since 23 Mar, 2005 from Detroit
:Edit:
Figured out how to get presets to work in the proper directory structure
...\TyrellN6.data\Presets\TyrellN6
They must go into a "TyrellN6" folder inside the presets folder.
Figured out how to get presets to work in the proper directory structure
...\TyrellN6.data\Presets\TyrellN6
They must go into a "TyrellN6" folder inside the presets folder.
-
- KVRist
- 493 posts since 20 Apr, 2004 from hki-fi
Holy cow Urs this thing sounds exquisite! <3
Just slapped some UAD love (FATSO max tranny + Dimension D 1+3+4) after it and I can't stop playing this thing!
Big thanks & Cheers
Just slapped some UAD love (FATSO max tranny + Dimension D 1+3+4) after it and I can't stop playing this thing!
Big thanks & Cheers
-
- u-he
- 30193 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
The pan was a relic from my other code. As the original concept for Tyrell is single output (mono as opposed to stereo) synth, I left out controls for pan and thus erased it from the parameter list.hakey wrote:Did the older version have Pan as a Matrix Target, or is that a figment of my imagination?
(I might bring it back for Diva though)
-
someone called simon someone called simon https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=185637
- KVRian
- 543 posts since 24 Jul, 2008 from a small city in a small country in the antipodes
does the mac version require 10.5 or greater by any chance? It failed AU manager in 10.4/11, logic 8.
Cheers
Cheers
-
- u-he
- 30193 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yes, probably. I havn't had luck with 10.4.x ever since I upgraded to Snow Leopard last year.someone called simon wrote:does the mac version require 10.5 or greater by any chance? It failed AU manager in 10.4/11, logic 8.
I could try to do a separate build, but some functions of the user interface might break / go missing since the latest stuff is all about Cocoa and 64 bit. It would have to be embedded in old code, which might be a bit of a stunt...
Urs-
someone called simon someone called simon https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=185637
- KVRian
- 543 posts since 24 Jul, 2008 from a small city in a small country in the antipodes
Yes, I wouldn't bother if I were you! I'm just stuck with old gear for a while...
-
- KVRist
- 54 posts since 20 Oct, 2010
Would i be wrong to say that all LFO mappings are not working 100%?
There are sevral times i can't seem to bind the LFO in the modulation matrix directly, same with binding the LFO directly from the filter.
The LFO at times randomly jumps online, for instance just touching MixSpread in the filter, will kick start the LFO to work on the filter.
Anyhow, if you did not know, i thought i should let you know Urs
There are sevral times i can't seem to bind the LFO in the modulation matrix directly, same with binding the LFO directly from the filter.
The LFO at times randomly jumps online, for instance just touching MixSpread in the filter, will kick start the LFO to work on the filter.
Anyhow, if you did not know, i thought i should let you know Urs
-
- u-he
- 30193 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Hmmm... havn't noticed that. Could it be related to LFO1 being modulated by ModWheel by default? - You can't hear LFO1 unless you turn the Wheel, or lower the effect of the ModWheel.Iamnevyn wrote:Would i be wrong to say that all LFO mappings are not working 100%?
Also, is it related to a specific LFO?