
oops

Maybe the booze was free on this occasion?musikmachine wrote:spaceman wrote:I've seen him do interviews and demos before and fwir he wasn't acting like that.zvenx wrote:Yes, why do they always pick socially awkward guys for this who look drunk, stoned or stuck in a 12 year old's mindset?musikmachine wrote:Interview here with some guy called Ernst
that's one annoying interviewer....
goodness gracious.
rsp
With the Props you will still have these problems, you have to get them ported over first though..Propellerhead website marketing BS wrote: Instead of unstable plug-ins, authentication nightmares and compatibility complications, Propellerhead offers an alternative...
What they should have said is that those things aren't universal. Some indeed don't allow undo or cut/paste, etc.headquest wrote:In fairness to Propellerhead it's possible they aren't deliberately being misleading, but are simply completely out of touch with the way the main hosts and plug-ins work these days...
We'll allow completely free plug-ins so the 30% isn't relevant there, is it?muLperi wrote:I'm betting YES since Propellerheads are taking 30% from sales and they didn't get anything from your VST's.mellotronaut wrote:i'm excited to have Uhbiks in Reason, but do i have to pay for them again ... and for Synplant and for Microtonic etc?
A quick note, plug-ins do allow undo in many cases - that's true! However it's often isolated to the plug-in, i.e. they incorporated undo themselves. This means that if you do something in one instrument, then open an effect, do something there and finally do some mixing in the DAW it is very hard to undo your settings in the instrument. Right?bmanic wrote: [rant]
[/rant]
...but they portray themselves as the only right way to do things.... never a good planspaceman wrote: What they should have said is that those things aren't universal. Some indeed don't allow undo or cut/paste, etc.
----
That's the way I see it. I imagined bespoke devices created for Reason rather than ports of existing plug-ins. But who knows? There's a lot of potential for all kinds of things here.headquest wrote:I suspect that porting VSTs is not what this is ultimately about. I think we will see separate instruments and effects developed for Re that are different entirely from the major VSTs out there... ones which play to the stgrengths of Reason while also dealing with its limitations.
Same here. This is all about Reason users. I doubt many will come from other DAW's to Reason because of RE for the reasons you mentioned. But as a long term Reason user I'm very excited about the potential of RE.As for whether this will attract users of other DAWs to switch to the Reason platform... like you, I very much doubt that will happen. I think that many users of other DAWs simply wouldn't like Reason's many other limitations - e.g. no MIDI OUT, very limited audio editing, reliance on three separate windows to get basic stuff done, etc.
They have their own app store, seeing how Apple is making megabucks from theirs. It's a very smart move, imho. I'm not a fan of the walled garden approach but what Urs said makes it seem like development won't be too onerous.quayquay17 wrote:Personally I'm kind of baffled as to why they are taking this route..
I seriously don't know yet. However...mellotronaut wrote:i'm excited to have Uhbiks in Reason, but do i have to pay for them again ... and for Synplant and for Microtonic etc?
So you have an opportunity to start a more altruistic music software companyheadquest wrote:...but they portray themselves as the only right way to do things.... never a good plan
With the greatest respect Mattias - I think the big problem word that is thrown around by Ernst and in the marketing is the characterisation of VST plugs as:Anosou wrote: A quick note...
Seriously??Propellerhead website wrote:...unstable plugins...
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026