No, I don't think a Ddim could appear for C Dorian. I don't know how that could happen. Please let me know if you see it again.sj1 wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:41 pm Testing out the new Dorian Scale Rules here. (I'm loving the idea of more rules to work with!)
I do not see how it is possible for these Rules to generate (via the Dice) a Ddim chord (ii dim), and yet they have. (IOW, I don't see ii dim anywhere in the Rules.)
RapidComposer v4 beta feedback and discussion (locked)
-
musicdevelopments musicdevelopments https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=223336
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 6014 posts since 9 Jan, 2010
-
crossovercable crossovercable https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=329708
- KVRian
- 576 posts since 26 May, 2014
I still had the beta 3 page opening in my browser that seemed dead for a long time until I just got a post to say it's here now and the beta 3 is now locked. So this is beta here ? as it don't have it in the title.
-
musicdevelopments musicdevelopments https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=223336
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 6014 posts since 9 Jan, 2010
No, I meant the note transposition in the note inspector:


sj1 wrote: Sun Jan 17, 2021 2:45 pm Hi,
If this is what you mean by transposition, then there is none applied:
RC - Zero Transposition.jpg
- KVRian
- 1177 posts since 13 Mar, 2017
Hi,musicdevelopments wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 5:12 pm No, I don't think a Ddim could appear for C Dorian. I don't know how that could happen. Please let me know if you see it again.
Thanks for your reply.
I've attached a file. You'll see Ddim in m19.
If you select m17 - m20 and keep rolling the dice it will happen again for you (at least it does for me, Windows SA version).
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
musicdevelopments musicdevelopments https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=223336
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 6014 posts since 9 Jan, 2010
In theory the phrase editor displays all notes. It looks for the lowest and highest note, and adjusts the vertical scale so that all notes fit. Do you mean this does not always work for you?
It would be good to do the same (auto zoom) horizontally...
It would be good to do the same (auto zoom) horizontally...
sj1 wrote: Sat Jan 16, 2021 9:09 pm Hi,
Is it possible to have the Phrase Editor open so that at least some (ideally all) of any existing notes are visible?
I'm noticing instances of the PE opening to a large blank area and then I have to hunt either up or down to find the notes.
- KVRian
- 1177 posts since 13 Mar, 2017
FWIW, on the subject of Chord Rules, for the long run -
The current paradigm of chord rules I'll call "next chord forward". Given a current chord, the Chord Rules define possibilities and probabilities for the "next" chord, one next chord at a time, iterating over the target range to instantiate.
To be sure, this works. RC is auto-magical in a sense and excellent results are easy to achieve.
However, if I may so say, the current scheme seems opposite from music theory as I've learned it, which (as I interpret it) seems to operate much more in a "prior chords backwards" way based on a target or destination chord (e.g. the I or i of the key) being the "anchor" and the rules being all about what is valid/good/standard to come before the anchor and lead up to or resolve to it. I'm talking about the concepts of cadence, dominants, secondary dominants, etc..
So, I can imagine that perhaps the RC of the future might take the entire current Chord Rules paradigm and call it 'Chord Rules Algo #1' and then provide 'Chord Rules Algo #2' thru N each of which would operate completely differently, and at least one of which which would be based on "prior chords backwards". Other possibilities might be e.g. Classical Practice, Romantic Practice, Jazz Practice, Pop Practice etc.
The current paradigm of chord rules I'll call "next chord forward". Given a current chord, the Chord Rules define possibilities and probabilities for the "next" chord, one next chord at a time, iterating over the target range to instantiate.
To be sure, this works. RC is auto-magical in a sense and excellent results are easy to achieve.
However, if I may so say, the current scheme seems opposite from music theory as I've learned it, which (as I interpret it) seems to operate much more in a "prior chords backwards" way based on a target or destination chord (e.g. the I or i of the key) being the "anchor" and the rules being all about what is valid/good/standard to come before the anchor and lead up to or resolve to it. I'm talking about the concepts of cadence, dominants, secondary dominants, etc..
So, I can imagine that perhaps the RC of the future might take the entire current Chord Rules paradigm and call it 'Chord Rules Algo #1' and then provide 'Chord Rules Algo #2' thru N each of which would operate completely differently, and at least one of which which would be based on "prior chords backwards". Other possibilities might be e.g. Classical Practice, Romantic Practice, Jazz Practice, Pop Practice etc.
- KVRian
- 1177 posts since 13 Mar, 2017
Yes, that's seemingly the experience that prompted me to write.musicdevelopments wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 5:30 pm In theory the phrase editor displays all notes. It looks for the lowest and highest note, and adjusts the vertical scale so that all notes fit. Do you mean this does not always work for you?
However, I'm typically mousing around, changing zoom level, etc. so since this is already supposed to be taken care of, and since most casual opening of the PE does seem to display all the notes (vertically), please let me observe more closely and report back with a scenario (if found) before you take up any action here.
Thanks!
- KVRian
- 1177 posts since 13 Mar, 2017
Watching BluGene's Chord Rules video I notice that the left/right arrow chord navigation with an open choice dialog as described around 7:50 no longer takes place in RC (v4.1b7). I'm guessing that this conflicted with something else and was changed.
The left/right arrow navigation w/o an open choice dialog does work, but you have to then reopen the choice dialog with the mouse. Doing that reopen with a keystroke (e.g. Enter, Return, or down arrow) would be nice.
Actually, the exact capability as shown in the video looks pretty nice. Does anyone remember why that was changed?
The left/right arrow navigation w/o an open choice dialog does work, but you have to then reopen the choice dialog with the mouse. Doing that reopen with a keystroke (e.g. Enter, Return, or down arrow) would be nice.
Actually, the exact capability as shown in the video looks pretty nice. Does anyone remember why that was changed?
Last edited by sj1 on Mon Jan 25, 2021 6:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- KVRian
- 1177 posts since 13 Mar, 2017
Hi,
Here is another example of visual obscuration. In this case the chords Quick Suggestions dialog (window?) pops up in a way that covers the prior context (prior chords).
FWIW, I'm always interested to know (be able to see) the prior context when making a new chord selection.
Here is another example of visual obscuration. In this case the chords Quick Suggestions dialog (window?) pops up in a way that covers the prior context (prior chords).
FWIW, I'm always interested to know (be able to see) the prior context when making a new chord selection.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- KVRist
- 455 posts since 12 Aug, 2015
Just read your message iv found a solution no need for new algorithm rc has it already .
just emailed u back let me know what you think .
Thanks
just emailed u back let me know what you think .
Thanks
-
- KVRAF
- 1753 posts since 30 Nov, 2013
Well, yes, of course you are right. Only I've been looking for these algorithms for jazz for about 40 years now) Maybe someday?
.So, I can imagine that perhaps the RC of the future might take the entire current Chord Rules paradigm and call it 'Chord Rules Algo #1' and then provide 'Chord Rules Algo #2' thru N each of which would operate completely differently, and at least one of which which would be based on "prior chords backwards". Other possibilities might be e.g. Classical Practice, Romantic Practice, Jazz Practice, Pop Practice etc
- KVRian
- 1177 posts since 13 Mar, 2017
Hi,musicdevelopments wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 5:09 pm In the structure inspector if you right-click on a part or line you can assign a chord rule to it, although it is used only if you manually generate a chord progression, so it does not affect the composition. Therefore I don't think displaying it on the master track would be a good idea.
I'm sorry, I've tried right-clicking all over the structure inspector and I see no such. Perhaps I'm doing it wrong. Could I ask for extra explanation and/or a picture here?
Also, there seems to be so many ways to go at generating a chord progression on part or all of the Master Track that I'm afraid I don't know what you mean by saying "only if you manually generate a chord progression".
And finally, I don't track the meaning of "does not affect the composition" either. If you change a chord (even one, anywhere), you've changed the Composition! ??
- KVRian
- 1177 posts since 13 Mar, 2017
Re: BluGene's Chord Rules video - am I correct that all the commentary there about needing to reload has by now been mooted?
I seem to be observing that I can create rule sets, add chords, etc. and it all happens right away.
I seem to be observing that I can create rule sets, add chords, etc. and it all happens right away.
- KVRian
- 1177 posts since 13 Mar, 2017
I have a conceptual workflow question perhaps someone can give me some good advice on.
If I have a section of a Composition (some number of measures) where I love a result and want to save all of that section (only) as a unit (the tracks, the phrases, the progression, melodies, etc.) so I can "get it back" at some point in the future, what is the best (or a good) way to proceed.?
If I have a section of a Composition (some number of measures) where I love a result and want to save all of that section (only) as a unit (the tracks, the phrases, the progression, melodies, etc.) so I can "get it back" at some point in the future, what is the best (or a good) way to proceed.?
- KVRian
- 1177 posts since 13 Mar, 2017
Hi,
If I've missed it, please advise, but if not, then I suggest adding a notepad capability to the program.
Ideally, any savable object would be able to save a note (text) along with itself. But if that is a judged a bit much ...
At least could we please be able to add our notes to a Composition (.rcCOMP file)?
If I've missed it, please advise, but if not, then I suggest adding a notepad capability to the program.
Ideally, any savable object would be able to save a note (text) along with itself. But if that is a judged a bit much ...
At least could we please be able to add our notes to a Composition (.rcCOMP file)?
