Audio Damage Phosphor Released
- KVRian
- 1496 posts since 10 Nov, 2002 from Earth
http://soundcloud.com/user3365679/ghost_of_a_book-mp3
Bass and synth noises (some of) are pure Phosphor.
Bass and synth noises (some of) are pure Phosphor.
-
- KVRist
- 179 posts since 9 Mar, 2003
Thanks Jazz, I will check these examples 
-
- KVRian
- 882 posts since 20 Feb, 2004
I was skeptical at first, because I really did not like the demoes on the AD website that much, but I bought it because I really love their work in general. I love this synth and use it a lot. It just sounds great, and is pretty easy to program your own sounds.
-
- KVRAF
- 4279 posts since 14 Nov, 2008 from UK
Similar to this, any point in this Phosphor synth if you already have Alchemy?vaisnava wrote:This one trick'ish pony for $60, or put $60 towards the Alchemy fund?... Hmmm...
I have never delved into Alchemy's additive side alot as yet(just a tiny bit of additive re-synthesis), want to, but too busy with work atm...(checked the CA 'additive' tutorial the other day)
I.e. learn Alchemy to it's full potential or is Phosphor a nice/different synth to have as well?
- KVRAF
- 3878 posts since 28 Jun, 2009 from Wherever I lay my hat
TBH, I think Phosphor is quite unique. Yes, it's "just" a very simple additive synth, but there is something about the sound... I haven't been able to get quite the same timbres in any other additive synth. As per usual, you can probably get close, and you'll have to decide yourself whether or not the subtle difference is worth the price of admission to you. Subtle x-modulation and the "original sound quality" toggle do a great job of recreating that gritty, early digital vibe.breakmixer wrote:
I.e. learn Alchemy to it's full potential or is Phosphor a nice/different synth to have as well?
I wouldn't part with it for anything. It just sounds so... fluorescent green.
-
- KVRAF
- 4279 posts since 14 Nov, 2008 from UK
Thanks for the answer, I look for reasons to not buy stuff these days(after buying/reselling loads in the past), but I kinda want to try this synth - but no demo to try on the fly...ariston wrote:TBH, I think Phosphor is quite unique. Yes, it's "just" a very simple additive synth, but there is something about the sound... I haven't been able to get quite the same timbres in any other additive synth. As per usual, you can probably get close, and you'll have to decide yourself whether or not the subtle difference is worth the price of admission to you. Subtle x-modulation and the "original sound quality" toggle do a great job of recreating that gritty, early digital vibe.breakmixer wrote:
I.e. learn Alchemy to it's full potential or is Phosphor a nice/different synth to have as well?
I wouldn't part with it for anything. It just sounds so... fluorescent green.
PS.. I know about the refund thing...
-
- KVRAF
- 4279 posts since 14 Nov, 2008 from UK
- KVRAF
- 12522 posts since 21 Mar, 2008 from Hannover, Germany
I just created an audio demo with AudioDamage Phosphor (my new "toy" which i got yesterday...). This is based on a preset i just created and that track just includes a single instance of Phosphor. The only external FX used is the ERS dimension D Chorus.
link: Phosphor - Phos Bronze Demo 1
This preset reminds me of some wavetable sounds of the PPG Wave 3.V and got a comparable "character" which i really like.
Phosphor is really a cool "little" synth and brought back the fun with additive synthesis to me which is usually quite complex. The GUI has a single page without any hidden menus which is a nice design IMO. I already have enough complex synths with tons of features (including additive ones like e.g. Cameleon 5000 and Alchemy) and such "simple" synths are sometimes a breeze.
Comparable synths /one page GUIs) which currently are some of my favorites are in TAL U-NO-LX or Tone2 Saurus (OK, Saurus got tabs for the mod matrix but most features are on one page...).
-------------------------------------------------
I made two sceenshots of a Signal Analyzer with all 16 partials in both Camel Audio Cameleon 5000 (only the first 16 there) and Phosphor activated.
You could see that Phosphor produces some small peaks at higher frequencies:

This is the reason why if you use the same partials on both synths they still sound slightly different (maybe not if you use all partials at once).
The picture above was with Phosphor in the "clean" mode. In "vintage" mode it looks like this:

This should be based on "Lo-Fi" sound and/or aliasing like in the original hardware synth which is emulated in Phosphor and activated with the "Vintage" button (this is mentioned in the manual).
This gets even more crazy if you use the "Crossmod" feature in Phosphor.
Here is an example where OSC2 uses the same 16 partials as OSC1 in in the pictures above and Crossmod is fully turned up in OSC1:

IMO the implementation of Crossmodulation in an Additive synth is a cool idea.
Based on the Phosphor manual this seems to be close to the way FM worked in the NED Synclavier.
--------------------------------------------------
http://beta.musicradar.com/gear/all/com ... 564/review
more:
http://www.audionewsroom.net/2011/01/au ... itive.html
http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2011/ ... or-review/
Ingo
link: Phosphor - Phos Bronze Demo 1
This preset reminds me of some wavetable sounds of the PPG Wave 3.V and got a comparable "character" which i really like.
Phosphor is really a cool "little" synth and brought back the fun with additive synthesis to me which is usually quite complex. The GUI has a single page without any hidden menus which is a nice design IMO. I already have enough complex synths with tons of features (including additive ones like e.g. Cameleon 5000 and Alchemy) and such "simple" synths are sometimes a breeze.
Comparable synths /one page GUIs) which currently are some of my favorites are in TAL U-NO-LX or Tone2 Saurus (OK, Saurus got tabs for the mod matrix but most features are on one page...).
-------------------------------------------------
I made two sceenshots of a Signal Analyzer with all 16 partials in both Camel Audio Cameleon 5000 (only the first 16 there) and Phosphor activated.
You could see that Phosphor produces some small peaks at higher frequencies:

This is the reason why if you use the same partials on both synths they still sound slightly different (maybe not if you use all partials at once).
The picture above was with Phosphor in the "clean" mode. In "vintage" mode it looks like this:

This should be based on "Lo-Fi" sound and/or aliasing like in the original hardware synth which is emulated in Phosphor and activated with the "Vintage" button (this is mentioned in the manual).
This gets even more crazy if you use the "Crossmod" feature in Phosphor.
Here is an example where OSC2 uses the same 16 partials as OSC1 in in the pictures above and Crossmod is fully turned up in OSC1:

IMO the implementation of Crossmodulation in an Additive synth is a cool idea.
Based on the Phosphor manual this seems to be close to the way FM worked in the NED Synclavier.
--------------------------------------------------
That link does not seem to work but this one should do it:breakmixer wrote:http://www.musicradar.com/gear/all/comp ... 4/review/2
Some more audio demos here...
http://beta.musicradar.com/gear/all/com ... 564/review
more:
http://www.audionewsroom.net/2011/01/au ... itive.html
http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2011/ ... or-review/
Ingo
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
- KVRAF
- 4801 posts since 1 Aug, 2005 from Warszawa, Poland
I've got this for the occasion of AD summer sale and it's surprisingly fun. Only one thing is bugging me, can you automate the partials? It would be even funnier to feed external LFO to a partial, but somehow I don't see those parameters on the list... I wonder, if it's just me, or they are not 'automatable'...
-
- KVRist
- 151 posts since 24 May, 2008
I wondered the same thing, searched the AD blog and found the original release.Zombie Queen wrote:I've got this for the occasion of AD summer sale and it's surprisingly fun. Only one thing is bugging me, can you automate the partials? It would be even funnier to feed external LFO to a partial, but somehow I don't see those parameters on the list... I wonder, if it's just me, or they are not 'automatable'...
A commenter asked that very question - Adam said they aren't. Still a fun little synth, but I was really hoping for that ability.
- KVRAF
- 4801 posts since 1 Aug, 2005 from Warszawa, Poland
Oh, hard luck. But, maybe someday... I hope there is no technical reason for this, you can fiddle with partials with the mouse while playing and it all sound alright, so...
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Will Phosphor ever get an update, the GUI is painfully small
For some reason or other Audio Damage seem to prefer tiny GUI's
I also got Automaton which is tiny. Even one of their latest plugs like Basic is pretty tiny compared to other plugs.
For some reason or other Audio Damage seem to prefer tiny GUI's
I also got Automaton which is tiny. Even one of their latest plugs like Basic is pretty tiny compared to other plugs.
-
- KVRAF
- 4279 posts since 14 Nov, 2008 from UK
Are you having a tiny rant here!Numanoid wrote:Will Phosphor ever get an update, the GUI is painfully small![]()
For some reason or other Audio Damage seem to prefer tiny GUI's
I also got Automaton which is tiny. Even one of their latest plugs like Basic is pretty tiny compared to other plugs.
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 37261 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from Scottish Borders
