FabFilter Pro-Q or Melda MAutoDynamicEq ?

[Trancit]

+ it adds latency (if this hasn´t already changed), which the Melda one doesn´t...

So the melda one doesn't even do lookahead? Hmm...

No and it does it fine...

EQ 4 is a nice EQ, but for me personally not enough...
I am a quite visual guy and (even I didn´t dig deeper into it) there was no option to change the spectrum analyzer to a 3 or 4.5db slope, which for me is a no-go...

For the Melda one you pay more but you get a lot more flexibilty imho... (even if I dislike these ugly handles on the EQ nodes)

[Chandlerhimself]

I also like MADEQ, just because it can do more. Some people don't like that and find it too complicated, but for me there are a lot of useful things it can do that can't be done with other plugins.

[pekbro]

TB EQ 4 does have a no latency mode in addition to a few other things as requested
by users. Jeroen is actually one of the more accommodating developers IMO.

Just sayin...

[Trancit]

TB EQ 4 does have a no latency mode in addition to a few other things as requested
by users. Jeroen is actually one of the more accommodating developers IMO.

That´s a nice move ... and don´t get me wrong... Toneboosters is a brilliant company releasing top notch stuff for very very good prices...
For me it´s only the missing love for spectrum analyzers...
That was the case for the old EQ and (for me) sadly didn´t change for the new one...

[Lesha]

I wanted to dynamically attenuate a high frequency ranged keyed by a range of low frequencies from the same input, without using external side chains.

apQualizr2 can do that pretty easily and many more interesting things