KVR Audio

Nielzie · Post by **Nielzie** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 8:14 pm

It sounds great, but the cpu usage kills it for me. Maybe in 10 years when I'll buy a new budget system..

kyodeejay · Post by **kyodeejay** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 4:32 am

Yes, it's pretty demanding. I only can use simple patches with it, but hey, I still use it

fischkopf · Post by **fischkopf** » Sun May 17, 2015 12:48 am

Yeah, I use it alot alongside Spire and Diva. It has a nice unique analogue character which sounds distinguishable from other 'virtual analogue' type VST synths. It can create a wide range of different types of sounds, from phat basses to screaming leads to rich pads and much more. I especially like creating pads with lush.

Still, it's pretty demanding on the CPU, but still not as demanding as it was 2 years ago, when people had even slower CPUs. But a little more CPU efficiency for future versions would be nice anyway.

Lejurai · Post by **Lejurai** » Mon Jun 08, 2015 10:19 am

That "demandingness" really depends on what you're trying to do.. Using just one layer and no internal fx, it's really easy for cpu. Of course if you stack more and more voices it'll soon eat your cpu but in mono..

fmr · Post by **fmr** » Mon Jun 08, 2015 10:22 am

Lejurai wrote:That "demandingness" really depends on what you're trying to do.. Using just one layer and no internal fx, it's really easy for cpu. Of course if you stack more and more voices it'll soon eat your cpu but in mono..

For just one voice and no effects, better use TAL Bassline-101, right?

basslinemaster · Post by **basslinemaster** » Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:05 pm

BlackWinny wrote: TAL-Bassline-101 makes less (even much less) that LUSH-101...

It's "less than", not "less that", by the way.

Krakatau · Post by **Krakatau** » Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:28 pm

fmr wrote:
Lejurai wrote:That "demandingness" really depends on what you're trying to do.. Using just one layer and no internal fx, it's really easy for cpu. Of course if you stack more and more voices it'll soon eat your cpu but in mono..
For just one voice and no effects, better use TAL Bassline-101, right?

indeed, there's no comparison feature wise between the two...

Lejurai · Post by **Lejurai** » Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:31 pm

fmr wrote:
Lejurai wrote:That "demandingness" really depends on what you're trying to do.. Using just one layer and no internal fx, it's really easy for cpu. Of course if you stack more and more voices it'll soon eat your cpu but in mono..
For just one voice and no effects, better use TAL Bassline-101, right?

Well.. If you own Lush but not TAL B.. Can't see why you should get TAL. Though to my ears those two are different beasts even though they should be emulating the same thing.

Lejurai · Post by **Lejurai** » Mon Jun 08, 2015 5:23 pm

Just checked.. As long as I stay away from unison, lush is pretty easy for my core2 duo with 32 polyphony and reverb, delay and chorus on. Just few % cpu hit.

fischkopf · Post by **fischkopf** » Mon Jun 08, 2015 6:47 pm

Lejurai wrote:Just checked.. As long as I stay away from unison, lush is pretty easy for my core2 duo with 32 polyphony and reverb, delay and chorus on. Just few % cpu hit.

That's great I guess, but this synth gets to sound especially great when you DO use unison. With the unison feature and the layers it feels more like an evolution, compared to plugins like TAL Bassline-101, which is simply a copy of the original SH-101. The kind of supersaw sounds this thing can put out sound really phat and (no pun intended) lush.

C-note · Post by **C-note** » Mon Jun 08, 2015 8:00 pm

AutoMotto · Post by **AutoMotto** » Mon Jun 08, 2015 8:12 pm

C-note wrote:No

Same here.

Patrick

ATS · Post by **ATS** » Mon Jun 08, 2015 8:44 pm

yeah no one uses it anymore, isn't it like 3 or 4 years old...everything sucks after it's 2 years old.

oh and if no one is talking about it here it must not be relevant.

Pyrotek45 · Post by **Pyrotek45** » Mon Jun 08, 2015 9:01 pm

make sure you have *enables multi threading* option turned on within the synth. im using plenty of unison in this video but its no where near as bad as diva for example.

Teksonik · Post by **Teksonik** » Mon Jun 08, 2015 9:43 pm

Nice tutorial above.............

Anyway do I use luSH101 ? Yes. Do I love luSH101 ? Hell yes............

Does anyone still use lush 101?