Is Sylenth still relevant in 2016?
- KVRAF
- 22969 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
I laugh at all these "XYZ company synths all sound the same" or "These synths sound different" proclamations.
You guys wouldn't know one synth from another in a mix and I'm going to prove it.
You guys wouldn't know one synth from another in a mix and I'm going to prove it.
-
- KVRAF
- 35675 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
I didn't say they sound the same. I said they sound "similar". That's a difference. And what is your example going to prove? I wouldn't even be able to tell if you use Synth1 or Diva for certain sounds.
- KVRAF
- 22969 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Exactly. You couldn't tell if I used Synth1 or Diva. In fact, most synths sound similar. Hell, I can count the number of synths out there with truly unique sound characteristics on one hand.chk071 wrote:I didn't say they sound the same. I said they sound "similar". That's a difference. And what is your example going to prove? I wouldn't even be able to tell if you use Synth1 or Diva for certain sounds.
That's why I laugh at all this crap.
-
do_androids_dream do_androids_dream https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=164034
- KVRAF
- 2908 posts since 26 Oct, 2007 from Kent, UK
Why?wagtunes wrote:I laugh at all these "XYZ company synths all sound the same" or "These synths sound different" proclamations.
Such a broad generalisation of folks you know nothing about. There's quite a 'superior' attitude coming through in this post.wagtunes wrote:You guys wouldn't know one synth from another in a mix and I'm going to prove it.
- KVRAF
- 22969 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Like I said, I'll prove it. Nothing superior about it. It has nothing to do with the people and everything to do with just about every synth out there that, in a mix, all sound the same, even to me.do_androids_dream wrote:Why?wagtunes wrote:I laugh at all these "XYZ company synths all sound the same" or "These synths sound different" proclamations.
Such a broad generalisation of folks you know nothing about. There's quite a 'superior' attitude coming through in this post.wagtunes wrote:You guys wouldn't know one synth from another in a mix and I'm going to prove it.
Like I said, I'll prove it.
-
- KVRAF
- 35675 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Do a filter sweep, or play the raw oscillators, i'd surely be able to tell if you play Synth1 or Diva.wagtunes wrote:Exactly. You couldn't tell if I used Synth1 or Diva. In fact, most synths sound similar. Hell, I can count the number of synths out there with truly unique sound characteristics on one hand.chk071 wrote:I didn't say they sound the same. I said they sound "similar". That's a difference. And what is your example going to prove? I wouldn't even be able to tell if you use Synth1 or Diva for certain sounds.
That's why I laugh at all this crap.
- KVRAF
- 22969 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
I said, in a mix. That's all that matters. All this "let's toss this into an analyzer" crap is just that, crap. Nobody listens to music that way. They listened to it processed in a mix. And processed in a mix you couldn't tell OXE from Omnisphere.chk071 wrote:Do a filter sweep, or play the raw oscillators, i'd surely be able to tell if you play Synth1 or Diva.wagtunes wrote:Exactly. You couldn't tell if I used Synth1 or Diva. In fact, most synths sound similar. Hell, I can count the number of synths out there with truly unique sound characteristics on one hand.chk071 wrote:I didn't say they sound the same. I said they sound "similar". That's a difference. And what is your example going to prove? I wouldn't even be able to tell if you use Synth1 or Diva for certain sounds.
That's why I laugh at all this crap.Play a filtered, and processed pad, and the chance that i can distinguish between those 2, especially as i don't know Diva very well, would be minimized by far.
-
- KVRAF
- 35675 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
I agree. But then, we're comparing synth to synth here, not how the synth sounds in a mix. When i say their synths sound similar, then i don't mean "in a mix". I mean, when you compare them with each other.
-
- KVRAF
- 9145 posts since 7 Oct, 2005
If all are sounding the same, why do you bother to make libraries for dozens of synths? Just one synth is enoughwagtunes wrote:Like I said, I'll prove it. Nothing superior about it. It has nothing to do with the people and everything to do with just about every synth out there that, in a mix, all sound the same, even to me.do_androids_dream wrote:Why?wagtunes wrote:I laugh at all these "XYZ company synths all sound the same" or "These synths sound different" proclamations.
Such a broad generalisation of folks you know nothing about. There's quite a 'superior' attitude coming through in this post.wagtunes wrote:You guys wouldn't know one synth from another in a mix and I'm going to prove it.
Like I said, I'll prove it.
Anyway, even in the mix there is a difference in the quality and presence ..etc. The difference becomes obvious when the lead/pad or any sound stands out (like playing solo or to make one part in the front). In a busy mix and with all the parts have the same volume, of course what the point if nothing is standing out!!
Using: Cubase Pro 15, Reason 13, Tascam US-4x4HR, MODX6, DM12D, LaunchKey 49, Yamaha guitar(Pacifica 612v) and bass (BB234) and some virtual instruments and synths.
-
- KVRAF
- 5664 posts since 7 Feb, 2013
If you know the sound of a certain synth well, you have good chances to recognize it in the mix. I remember I posted one of my tracks and Chk071 immediately recognized Spire in it, despite I wasn't using any of the factory presets, iirc (maybe except for some very basic plucks).
Right now I'm listening to Alignments-Ignition album and I'm almost 100% sure the guy uses Spire alot, if not for 100% his sounds
And in any case the listener will surely tell if you have used a great synth or a crappy one
Right now I'm listening to Alignments-Ignition album and I'm almost 100% sure the guy uses Spire alot, if not for 100% his sounds
And in any case the listener will surely tell if you have used a great synth or a crappy one
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try
- KVRAF
- 22969 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Because people own many synths. Duh!EnGee wrote:If all are sounding the same, why do you bother to make libraries for dozens of synths? Just one synth is enoughwagtunes wrote:Like I said, I'll prove it. Nothing superior about it. It has nothing to do with the people and everything to do with just about every synth out there that, in a mix, all sound the same, even to me.do_androids_dream wrote:Why?wagtunes wrote:I laugh at all these "XYZ company synths all sound the same" or "These synths sound different" proclamations.
Such a broad generalisation of folks you know nothing about. There's quite a 'superior' attitude coming through in this post.wagtunes wrote:You guys wouldn't know one synth from another in a mix and I'm going to prove it.
Like I said, I'll prove it.![]()
-
- KVRAF
- 9145 posts since 7 Oct, 2005
So you do your libraries because the people owns many synths in spite of your belief that they sound the same in a mix?!wagtunes wrote:Because people own many synths. Duh!EnGee wrote:If all are sounding the same, why do you bother to make libraries for dozens of synths? Just one synth is enoughwagtunes wrote:Like I said, I'll prove it. Nothing superior about it. It has nothing to do with the people and everything to do with just about every synth out there that, in a mix, all sound the same, even to me.do_androids_dream wrote:Why?wagtunes wrote:I laugh at all these "XYZ company synths all sound the same" or "These synths sound different" proclamations.
Such a broad generalisation of folks you know nothing about. There's quite a 'superior' attitude coming through in this post.wagtunes wrote:You guys wouldn't know one synth from another in a mix and I'm going to prove it.
Like I said, I'll prove it.![]()
So, are those people fools? Duh!
Using: Cubase Pro 15, Reason 13, Tascam US-4x4HR, MODX6, DM12D, LaunchKey 49, Yamaha guitar(Pacifica 612v) and bass (BB234) and some virtual instruments and synths.
- KVRAF
- 22969 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
No, not at all. They just like to have different synths for a variety of reasons, not all having to do with the sound itself. I'm not going to get into all the reasons here and now because I have a project to work on in order to prove my point, and I will prove my point.EnGee wrote:So you do your libraries because the people owns many synths in spite of your belief that they sound the same in a mix?!wagtunes wrote:Because people own many synths. Duh!EnGee wrote:If all are sounding the same, why do you bother to make libraries for dozens of synths? Just one synth is enoughwagtunes wrote:Like I said, I'll prove it. Nothing superior about it. It has nothing to do with the people and everything to do with just about every synth out there that, in a mix, all sound the same, even to me.do_androids_dream wrote:Why?wagtunes wrote:I laugh at all these "XYZ company synths all sound the same" or "These synths sound different" proclamations.
Such a broad generalisation of folks you know nothing about. There's quite a 'superior' attitude coming through in this post.wagtunes wrote:You guys wouldn't know one synth from another in a mix and I'm going to prove it.
Like I said, I'll prove it.![]()
So, are those people fools? Duh!
And as I said, there are a handful of synths that nothing else sounds like. But you can't tell me that, in a mix, you could tell whether I used Monark for a bass line or Arturia's Mini V. With the majority of synths out there, the differences in sound can only be heard isolated and carefully analyzed.
That isn't how people listen to music, so as far as I'm concerned, those comparisons are meaningless. I don't care if XYZ's sawtooth wave is more "true" than ABC's sawtooth wave. So what? Meaningless in the context of music.
-
- KVRAF
- 9145 posts since 7 Oct, 2005
Yes, it is difficult to tell between similar synths, but still there is a difference. This tiny differences are what we call "details". Sometimes, people forget the main idea and be obsessed with the details, and sometimes they ignore them. But, IMO, many of the great masterpieces (whatever they are) are in the details. So, that there is a good mixing/mastering engineer and a great mixing/mastering engineer. The great ones, always, care a lot about the details.wagtunes wrote:
No, not at all. They just like to have different synths for a variety of reasons, not all having to do with the sound itself. I'm not going to get into all the reasons here and now because I have a project to work on in order to prove my point, and I will prove my point.
And as I said, there are a handful of synths that nothing else sounds like. But you can't tell me that, in a mix, you could tell whether I used Monark for a bass line or Arturia's Mini V. With the majority of synths out there, the differences in sound can only be heard isolated and carefully analyzed.
That isn't how people listen to music, so as far as I'm concerned, those comparisons are meaningless. I don't care if XYZ's sawtooth wave is more "true" than ABC's sawtooth wave. So what? Meaningless in the context of music.
Using: Cubase Pro 15, Reason 13, Tascam US-4x4HR, MODX6, DM12D, LaunchKey 49, Yamaha guitar(Pacifica 612v) and bass (BB234) and some virtual instruments and synths.
-
- KVRAF
- 35675 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Maybe, but it's the major argument whether you buy a synth or not.wagtunes wrote: And as I said, there are a handful of synths that nothing else sounds like. But you can't tell me that, in a mix, you could tell whether I used Monark for a bass line or Arturia's Mini V. With the majority of synths out there, the differences in sound can only be heard isolated and carefully analyzed.
That isn't how people listen to music, so as far as I'm concerned, those comparisons are meaningless. I don't care if XYZ's sawtooth wave is more "true" than ABC's sawtooth wave. So what? Meaningless in the context of music.
