HahaSynthman2000 wrote:Anyone who truly appreciates music knows AI music is dead, both actually and figuratively. It has no future because it has no past it comes from a place of zero experiences. Maybe for some that is the unique and interesting aspect, for me it comes from and empty place (not even empty because that place does not even exist), nothing and nowhere which is the opposite of human musical endeavour.
Music and its interdependence with emotion and other human factors means it is infinitely complex as it is an interaction between the creator and the listener. But that infinite complexity is relative to human experiences/memory/futures/lives/times/moments/people/places and probably 10's of other factors that are traits of human brain activity/auditory experience/consciousness.
Without consciousness in creation and consumption the true power of music is non existent.
A cave man and woman singing, making rudimentary rhythms from hand made instruments in a cave reverb is a million times more interesting and valuable than AI music.
AI music is as much use as jeans made from blue tissue paper.
Quoted for posterity, although it's just more of the same. And not just more of the same from the same writer, but also in the historical perspective, as numerous things have been declared uninteresting and dead and futureless and empty throughout the history of different arts. There will be interesting ethical and aesthetic questions to be dealt with regarding AI, ones that are already nascent in the state of AI development today, but the kinds of answers (and the kinds of questions they imply) quoted above will soon be petty and naive in comparison.
Specifically replying to the first statement, "anyone who truly appreciates music knows AI music is dead" : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
