Advantages / disadvantages Studio One Pro and Cubase Pro

[_leras]

Yeah I agree, Cubase can be a pain in the ass to setup but tbh, its not a big deal to me. I like to group and change routing and stuff as I go along. My main template runs the same.

I'd like the option to have a secondary out before the stereo out and all new channels / groups / fx channels etc route to that.

I always have a PreM group and a PrePar parralel group track before my main out. Pre M is like my main output, it also gets routed in parralel for some distortion/saturation/bite that I blend in that you 'can't hear unless you mute it'.

I also don't mind the setup needed in cubase. Its a pain compared to Bitwig when just creating, but is fine when setting up to mix.

[kev2525]

^^^ bx ones even mark the automated parameters differently

also should be supported more ... and it seems doesn't work in Cubase (just checked and can't see), so another +1 for S1

ps. so seems in S1 there is two-ways communication between the plugins and the host which is missing for C

I think the native Cubase plugins can Talk to the host. For example you can send sampler track instruments directly to padshop which is a nice use for sound designers. Also, internal cubase plugins respond to the midi signals from the native lfo plug in. But generally you're right, S1 is better. I wonder why C12 haven't done this yet?