Bitwig 6 Beta coming soon
- KVRAF
- 4803 posts since 21 Jan, 2008 from oO
I support the idea of having CLAP modules within the grid, it makes a lot of sense also strategically to further position CLAPs benefits. However, it may be smart to apply some restrictions, to keep everything stable and performant.
JamWide - a cross-platform Ninjam client for DAWs
- KVRian
- 1199 posts since 10 Sep, 2014
Me too.Dionysos wrote: Mon Aug 11, 2025 4:01 pm I find it a bit weird in general that online conversation around Bitwig is often framed as if it was massively struggling to find users, without any evidence.
- KVRian
- 1384 posts since 7 Dec, 2017
The average listenerxbitz wrote: Mon Aug 11, 2025 5:54 am Bitwig’s biggest problem is that with the tools it offers, you can’t really achieve the wow factor for the average listener.
Pretty sure it's possible in Bitwig.
-JH
-
Sonic Illusions Sonic Illusions https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=592124
- KVRist
- 89 posts since 5 Dec, 2022
Score export and video editing.
-
feedbackmachine feedbackmachine https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=411647
- KVRer
- 19 posts since 11 Jan, 2018
Sounds like indigestion, surely possible.JHernandez wrote: Tue Aug 12, 2025 3:17 pm
The average listener![]()
Pretty sure it's possible in Bitwig.
-
- KVRist
- 70 posts since 10 Mar, 2022
I feel like you can say the same about Reaper's built-in plugins, that it's very basic. Bitwig goes for a very utilitarian approach. It doesn't bundle effects or modulators, it expects you to add those on and do your own routing. I really like it personally, also I've found some very nice presets in bitwig. It may not be the biggest bestest most analog modeling synth or something but do we really want them spending time building that kind of thing? It's funny because I thought everyone was complaining the OPPOSITE, that bitwig's biggest problem is that it spent too much time adding shiny new devices and not updating the core DAW features. Personally speaking, If bitwig wants that kind of out of the box shiny they should just do what logic did and buy out third party synths and effects to round out the bundled content. If anything I find bitwig's devices MORE enticing than other daw's because they fit in so well with the core workflow concepts and you can do things that no other daw can do, normally I wouldn't think about what stuff it has bundled because I bring my own preferred plugins! However, since I can do things like spectral splitting and put custom effects in the reverb chamber, I care a LOT more about what bitwig offers than I would any other DAW.apoclypse wrote: Tue Aug 12, 2025 9:40 amWhat does this even mean. Bigwigs instruments are really nice. I really like Polymer and the other synths are great too. They don’t sound amazing out of the box but that’s kind of the point imo. I do think Logics, Ableton, and FLStudios instruments sound better out of box, but that’s mostly due to how sparse the presets are for Bitwig. They have all these cool tools but don’t really showcase them in a way that inspires. I’ve definitely favorited a few polymer patches that have wowed me.xbitz wrote: Mon Aug 11, 2025 5:54 am Bitwig’s biggest problem is that with the tools it offers, you can’t really achieve the wow factor for the average listener.
U-he plugins do sound good but they come at a cost. They are usually pretty cpu heavy and imo sometimes they are not that easy to use. I like my synths simple and straightforward. No visual clutter.
- KVRAF
- 26922 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
I wouldn't say that is too harsh, but it is out of date. That post was made in 2021 and there have been lots of additions to the Grid since then. The newer Osc's and Filters sound better and are more musical. I still wouldn't put the Grid on the level of my favorite synths in terms of sound quality, but rather a step down which is plenty good for lots of sounds. The sound quality vs cpu use is excellent. I have an EP type sound that is lovely and I can easily have 20 voices playing at once.xbitz wrote: Mon Aug 11, 2025 2:41 pmrandom search in google,
"Bitwig synths jus don't sound anywhere near as good as other ones I have. I'd love to be able to use less third party plugins but there are too many that sound unique and too great. I barely use the bitwig instruments at all." viewtopic.php?p=8263570#p8263570 and it wasn't mehappy?
let's say, that’s a bit too harsh — Polymer is perfectly fine, just not outstanding, but I’d definitely appreciate it if the u-he synths suddenly became native to Bitwig.
Also the Grid is very flexible and can do lots of stuff I cannot easily do elsewhere. For example, none of the 3rd party synths I regularly use can have an MSEG as the Amp Env.
Since my favorite u-he synths all have CLAP versions that support Bitwig's modulation system, including PolyMod... plus Bitwig's Note Expressions, there's really not much benefit from having the u-he synths native to Bitwig.
-
- KVRian
- 666 posts since 11 Apr, 2006
One thing I've noticed about Bitwig's filters is that they seem to saturate too much at the default settings. If you back off of the drive knob's default setting, giving the resonance more headroom, they don't sound as crushed and floppy. Still wouldn't say they're great, but it helps.
-
- KVRAF
- 5055 posts since 27 Jul, 2004
I know my opinion isn´t very popular amongst Bitwig users and I know the typical arguments... nonetheless I wanted to have it said one more time:pdxindy wrote: Tue Aug 12, 2025 7:10 pm ... I still wouldn't put the Grid on the level of my favorite synths in terms of sound quality, but rather a step down which is plenty good for lots of sounds. The sound quality vs cpu use is excellent. I have an EP type sound that is lovely and I can easily have 20 voices playing at once.
...
The question isn´t just to count how many voices you can play with it, the question is more how many voices you can play with a 3rd party instrument which sounds even more lovely...
You confirmed already that Bitwig´s internals aren´t on the same level with your favourite synths in terms of quality but I bet the 3rd party instrument with the even more lovely sound lets you play at least the double amount of voices... and that is a problem, isn´t it?
Overdriven said: Delivering like a noob but charging (in terms of CPU hunger) like a Pro cannot be a good ratio imho.
I don´t use much of Bitwig´s internals because the sound quality/CPU ratio is often ridiculous especially for the more modern devices/modules...
I don´t know how others feel but I find less quality than 3rd party but at least double (if not 4 times of the...) CPU consumption not very appealing... the Grid and devices which are based on the Grid like Polymer and many others take a crazy amount of CPU compared to other instruments sounding much better out of the box with much less CPU...
I can easily live with the fact that most stock plugins no matter of which DAW cannot defeat specialized 3rd party stuff and I am absolutely fine with that...
But having this issue (which Bitwig devices definetely do) for a price of 4 times the CPU use, is for me a personal no-go and makes Bitwig internals in many situations something to avoid at all costs.
I know many of you simply feel good if they can throw around "big numbers"... i.e. producing at 96kHz even if I render afterwards to a 128bit mp3 ...
That´s your choice...
But getting it forced on me without any option to turn this off ... I am sorry but I cannot speak about a good sound quality/CPU ratio...
-
- KVRAF
- 5144 posts since 3 Oct, 2013
could cheat with FreqTube, but then would have to pay the price of Bitwig x 2 all over again — expensive hobby this is
yupp, if the Grid sounded like The Legend combined with a hardware distortion unit, I wouldn’t have a word to say.
yupp, if the Grid sounded like The Legend combined with a hardware distortion unit, I wouldn’t have a word to say.
Last edited by xbitz on Wed Aug 13, 2025 7:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"Where we're workarounding, we don't NEED features." - powermat
- KVRAF
- 26922 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
You would lose the bet. The softsynths that I use that I put in the top tier for sound quality use a lot of CPU. Bazille for example can crush my cpu. Various of my typical Grid synth patches use way less CPU than Bazille.Trancit wrote: Wed Aug 13, 2025 3:40 pm
You confirmed already that Bitwig´s internals aren´t on the same level with your favourite synths in terms of quality but I bet the 3rd party instrument with the even more lovely sound lets you play at least the double amount of voices... and that is a problem, isn´t it?
In terms of the highest possible sound quality, my Eurorack Modular is unmatched by anything in software. Most of the time though, softsynths are good enough that it doesn't really matter.
There are plenty of simpler sounds I create that any decent synth can make. For those sounds in particular, the Grid is great because it is so flexible. I can make lots of beautiful sounds in the Grid that are easy on the CPU. I have plugins that cover what it cannot do and for me, the Grid is a regular workhorse.
Yes, there are some Bitwig devices that use a lot of CPU, but also plenty that don't. I have some lovely pads using the lowly Organ device. It's kinda pathetic... except each partial can be modulated separately, including at audio rate and since it has the voice stacking, suddenly it can do some lush sweet sounds. With longer release and the voice stacking, I can easily have 30 or 40 voices playing at once and it barely touches the CPU meter.
I also have a bunch of beautiful sounds using FM-4. It's pretty low for CPU use. When you include the modulation possibilities, voice stacking and note expressions, it becomes more capable than it might seem.
The reason DAW's can use plugins is because they cannot do everything, and I assume hardly anyone expects them to. To me there is no problem if not every Bitwig device suits my needs.
-
- KVRAF
- 5055 posts since 27 Jul, 2004
pdxindy wrote: Wed Aug 13, 2025 5:25 pm You would lose the bet. The softsynths that I use that I put in the top tier for sound quality use a lot of CPU. Bazille for example can crush my cpu. Various of my typical Grid synth patches use way less CPU than Bazille.
...
I think we spare us the discussion...
-
- KVRist
- 70 posts since 10 Mar, 2022
yeah some of them do saturate at a pretty low threshold. Saw some video about ittumface wrote: Wed Aug 13, 2025 6:32 am One thing I've noticed about Bitwig's filters is that they seem to saturate too much at the default settings. If you back off of the drive knob's default setting, giving the resonance more headroom, they don't sound as crushed and floppy. Still wouldn't say they're great, but it helps.
- KVRAF
- 26922 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Lowering the input level (Drive) for sure reduces saturation. Also, in the Inspector is the Q-Limit parameter. That one is worth understanding. I'm not a fan of the default setting for it.gulugulufish wrote: Wed Aug 13, 2025 7:43 pmyeah some of them do saturate at a pretty low threshold. Saw some video about ittumface wrote: Wed Aug 13, 2025 6:32 am One thing I've noticed about Bitwig's filters is that they seem to saturate too much at the default settings. If you back off of the drive knob's default setting, giving the resonance more headroom, they don't sound as crushed and floppy. Still wouldn't say they're great, but it helps.
-
shatteredmindofbob shatteredmindofbob https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=538671
- KVRist
- 99 posts since 20 Nov, 2021
I am so confused. Bitwig is a DAW. U-he makes plugins to be used inside a DAW... including Bitwig.
I really don't understand what one has to do with the other.
I really don't understand what one has to do with the other.